The 'Deplorables' Speech: Five Years Later

Guess I just don't get it. To me, Drumph has always come off as a lying, arrogant, blowhard, dipshit. If that what counts for charisma, I don't want any part of it.

 

Hitler had the same charisma. Trump's charisma gets many people to believe his arrogant, blowhard, dipshit lies. You can fool some of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time, but he couldn't fool enough of them all of the time.

Perhaps what you don't get is, why don't they get it? Why can't the basket of idiots see that he's full of shit? That's okay, I don't get it either.

 

"traditional right wing values of common decency." That's a fuckin'joke if I ever heard one! Your man trump certainly embodies those values doesn't he? Along with Greene, Boebert, turtle boy, Cawthorn and your buddies in arms January the 6th. Republican don't give a shit about democracy--Alex Jones is another good example of common right wing common decency. They're playing to the ignorant , the easily duped racist white supremacists all the way. Trump is still bleating about the media spending too much time on the weather tragedies that have killed and harmed so many. "they spent all day talking about the weather instead of me." The sick prick is still saying "the press is the enemy of the people."!! Fascist pig!!

It's not Clinton we have to worry about--she's had her day in the limelight. It's the right wing--"common decency" easily duped people that we should concern ourselves with. You know--like Tukkker kkkarlson.

 

Thanks.

A person of extreme nationalist views is under the same umbrella as a person of extreme racist views???

Like, really... That's a whole different ballgame. The only thing they have in common is that somebody has called them each "extreme".

Plus, to have been a Nazi, you had to be both racist and nationalist. Not just one or the other. But primarily racist.

Odd that neo-Nazi can be either when each is so different. Which in essence makes it a very vague term by that definition. Like vehicle vs car, truck, or motorcycle.

I believe in the sovereignty of nations. Who thinks that constitutes "extreme"?

 

If the jackboot fits...

 

That is responsible for much of the problems our country faces. And why we need competition among schools so parents can fund the ones they think are doing the best by their kids, thus improving the education to better society.

 

And we're off the subject again. Unless you're talking about the lack of education among Trump supporters.

 

Is that what I "seem to think", or do you seem to be reading minds? I'm going with the latter because I never made any statement comparing that group to Nazis. Others may have, you could try keeping better track, but 1) I don't know enough to opine, and 2) I'm not forming my opinion based on your attack on what you said you thought I was thinking. So there's that.

Common decency and traditional right wing values, you ask? How about a male and female marrying under God and raising their children in the church to love and respect others, follow the ten commandments, work for one's own likelihood, and not demand the fruits of another's labor. It doesn't get any more right-wing than that.

Lawless leftist opportunists you're confused about? I was referring to the people hurting others and destroying the property of others. It kinda dominated the news for a while last year in case you missed it.

 

I bet one of their tenets was eating enjoyable meals. So by your definition, the vast majority of humans are neo-nazi.

 

Competition has never required a "level playing field". You and I could both enter a motorcycle riding competition and one or the other would emerge the victor.

 

–a modern extreme right-wing political movement and ideology based on a resurgence of support for Nazi ideological principles.Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - The Free Dictionary
Neo-Nazis, literally meaning "new" Nazis, is a general term referring to all social or political movements that work to reintroduce concepts of the Nazi period of 1933–to 1945 in Europe and are based upon the racial policies of fascism.
www.encyclopedia.com › neo-nazis


U.S.: Wikipedia

• American Front
  
• American Nazi Party
• Aryan Brotherhood of Texas
• Aryan Brotherhood
• Aryan Nations
  
• Aryan Republican Army
  
• Atomwaffen Division
  
• The Base
  
• The Daily Stormer
  
• Hammerskins
  
• Identity Evropa
  
• National Alliance
  
• National Socialist Liberation Front
  
• National Socialist Movement
  
• National Socialist Vanguard
  
• National Vanguard
  
• Nationalist Front
  
• NSDAP/AO
  
• Renegade Tribune -
  
• The Right Stuff
  
• The Order
  
• Traditionalist Worker Party
  
• Vanguard America
  
• White Aryan Resistance

RELATED GROUPS

• Proud Boys
• Oath Keepers
• Three Percenters
• Q-Anon
• Patriot Front
• Patriot Prayer
• KKK
• League of the South
• Turning Points USA
• America First

 

I'll bet you're wrong. That may be a "tenet" of the Diner's Club, but no Neo-Nazi group I know of has that as a tenet. And it's a logical fallacy. "Nazis have bad breath. You have bad breath (for purpose of illustration). Therefore , you must be a Nazi."

 

False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges."

 

They're deplorable and some can be compared to nazis. Done.