The body can be killed easy

Yes - but at least it'd make for a hell of a LOLcat photo.

 

Probably can't own one legally in California anyway.

 

Cyanide. Fast, clean and hard to detect.

 

welll you can have ferrets eather, but my grandma used to have one, cute as hell and loved to play ...it bit the hell outa my bro though, i guess hes just nota aminal people like me

 

You win.

Except it's easier to detect than it use to be.

 

i believe that if every atom in your body moved an atomic unit in a single unison direction, every atomic unit of your body would be destroyed and in less time than it would take with cyanide, since you'd be brain dead due to every nueron being simaltaniusly taken apart and disconected from each other for a atomic second and every organ system, including the skin would be dead and compromised in a time so instant, i cant even begin to describe it, but im just sayin ya know

 

and just how would one cause such a thing to occur in someone?

 

You don't know what you talking about.

"Simultaneous" is a null term-- but that's a differnt thread!
--------
When I was Chemical Engineering student, Cyanide was the most dangerous thing in the lab outside of white phosphorus.

WP burst into flame and burned hot as hell on contact with moist air (your breath), and cyanide would kill you in 30 seconds if you breathed a whiff by sucking the oxygen out of you blood. No stopping it unless your already hooked to an iron lung

 

i know about chemicals and i know what im talking about it is possible, its a matter of statistics (not the right word but i couldnt think of the word i mean to use), aka its an INSANELY small chance but could infact happen. just as such that an object, say an empty coffee mug, could jump over a tiny bit to one dirrection if all its composing atoms were to move at the same time to one direction. possible, barley, but it is.

you couldnt cause it to, its a matter of chance

 

xcandy, its the universes way of killing

 

P.S geck:


theoretical science is all fine and dandy but it is in fact just that, theoretical

therefore it has not been completely disproven that something cant move simultaneously of another thing, so it is technically not proven that my theory is incorrect


of corse this applys to my theory, but thats fine, i think its possible and thats what matters to me

 

Eienstiens Theory of relativity denies the real existence of the concept

 

well, under the theory of special relativity, a particle with mass needs infinate amount of energy to travel ~equal~ to the speed of light, yet Cherenkov radiation is caused when a charged partical travles faster then the speed of light (theres other things with that, but thats the main point of it i want to make), so these contridect each other, one saying that a partical can only go AS fast as (not faster than) the speed of like, while radioactive glow is created by contridicting this.


the point i make with this is that theorys contridict. therefore, it is possible that the theory dictating that concept supporting my idea of "Spontaneous Bodily Destruction" (SBD) is incorrect, and therefore my SBD theory is correct (potentially )

 

from wikipedia
Cherenkov radiation (also spelled Cerenkov or Čerenkov) is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle (such as an electron) passes through an insulator at a constant speed greater than the speed of light in that medium.Cherenkov radiation (also spelled Cerenkov or Čerenkov) is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle (such as an electron) passes through an insulator at a constant speed greater than the speed of light in that medium

light travels slower through matter than through a vacuum. so a particle may be able to travle faster through a certain medium than light, it still is not travelling faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. thats what i think anyway.

 

wait whened we bring in vacuums?

 

Special Relativity applies to C in a vacum.