Building 7 tells the whole story. A couple of fires and it supossedly collapses with uniformity, just like a controlled demolition. STEEL BUILDINGS do not collapse from office fires!!
Are you that stupid? (Rhetorical question, of course.) Our government is allowing China to buy up the country, so why would they stop it or want to stop it? The world (including the US) is run by internationalists who have no allegiance to one particular country. The plan is to bring the US down since it has served its purpose, hence the reason China is being set up to become the new world power, at least temporarily. Ultimately they want a one world government.
did you think it should have fallen over on its side?.....did you take physics....things fall ''down''.not in any other direction....that one view in the video does not show the other side where the fire was
Mu In the history of the world. That is the only steel building ever to collapse from an office fire. Burning paper does not melt steel..never, ever, ever
please, just very clearly and succinctly could you tell us who "they" are and provide reliable supporting documentation.
actually building 7 really is the "smoking gun" and from all I've seen and read every demolition expert or constru7ction expert that has been asked to review the footage have determined it was a planned demolition, almost textbook. while not going the entire way down crazy street as PR is prone to doing, I feel 911 was a contrived and planned event orchestrated by the Bush family/regime and the Saudi royal family(s) to remove an unstable element in the area while saving Arab face and securing oil supplies for America. And the underlying motive is/was $$$$$$$$$$$, not world domination.
Watch this 28 second..Larry Silverstein the owner telling them to pull it. A demolition term https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk
steel melts at 2750 degrees...its integrity weakens much lower than that....do you actually believe fires don't get that hot?......stick to Jehovah because you are no bill nye sorry man..i cant continue this debate....its like talking to a parrot.....
Have you even seen footage of the WTC-7 collapse, or have you been too busy paying attention to whatever garbage the TV feeds you? The building should not have collapsed. Period. It sustained relatively minimal damage, as can be seen in pictures taken before the building fell.
LOL!!! Just wow!!! So there should be literally HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of buildings that have collapsed from fire. Show me ONE other building other than the buildings that fell on 9/11. This world is doomed because too many people like yourself do not have a functioning brain.
Ok, yes, I am a parrot for truth. What about the fire retardant they treat each girder with. It was not a raging fire. Do you know what departments had offices in building 7?
yes pr ive seen it many times....ive also read the sites that explain all your questions or facts or whatever.....its not worth all the typing and pasting to have it out here lets agree to disagree on this we still see eye to eye on good weed
I consider you to be an intelligent likeable guy....except when it.comes to anything conspiracy related. Seriously, dafuq? Who are these internationalists? Spectre? Dr Evil and his friends? The Decepticons? What was the end goal of any 9/11 conspiracy, to get your population to support invasion of a couple buttfuck little countries no one cares about anyway? Its been a.decade and a half, and nothing changed
when you heat steel or any other material, the material expands and ultimately changes shape and warps. Without being structural engineers any conclusion we can make about how exactly any given structure will handle this will be mostly speculation, but it doesnt take an engineer to realize that this isnt desirable if you wish to maintain structural integrity, especially if the expansion and warping is non-uniformly distributed. Eventually some structural members could warp from the heat and shear themselves loose from the larger structure.