The 2024 Election

“The difference between humans and animals? Animals would never allow the dumbest ones to lead the pack.” Trump attacks Haley for absence of her husband, who is deployed | CNN Politics

 

$354 million! Zing zap pow kaboom!! He's fucked!!
Judge fines Donald Trump more than $350 million, bars him from running businesses in N.Y. for three years

 

I love Trump's new fundraising effort with $400 gold sneakers. Have you seen them yet? And someone started a go fund me for Trump for $355 million to pay his fine. LMAO!

 

So if he sells a million sneakers he can pay his fine! And if he sells them in the red states he just might pull it off!

He's also selling $100 bottles of perfume. Wonder what that smells like!

 

it seems everyone, including the media have forgotten how Trump caused over one million American deaths due to his politicizing COVID-19. So easy to forget, eh?

 

"I have to say the design certainly stands out, but from my experience, the shoes seem to lack some refinement and innovation that truly popular brands deliver."
"The high price tag could also limit interest since the sneakers don't seem to match the quality or features of competitors at that level." - Houna Bech

 

Gosh, I wonder which demographic he is trying to recruit now...old white men?

 

My honest instinct is to sit this one out. I will vote democrat and for Biden, but my heart isn't in it.

As for the candidacy, I would like our candidates to address internet policy and to implement a blockade at the service provider level to adopt a new law requiring the ISP to provide a distinct binary option at the outset of any internet purchase to implement a choice; with or without unmitigated mature content, or if a binary isn't realistic for the first amendment or for the outcome foisted onto industry workers whose lives would be adversely effected, then a gradient providing options for something more like PG, R, or X.

Also, I think what we're not saying yet and possibly to be more politically correct is that America is headed into trouble if we don't make some adjustments. To that end, policy decisions seem to be muted with side-effects to that end instead of representation at the inception.

What I mean is no one wants to admit anything or be accountable about difficulties in a values-toward direction; that would be to admit our morals are not quite intact.

I think we need to shift gears, and to see that happening would motivate a lot of people to be morally invested in our political elections and the legislative and judicial environments. One example is the supreme court. Even with the most conservative bench in the history of the country, we might see an adjusted ruling for something like Roe v. Wade to incorporate modern principles with acknowledgement to moralistic integrity.

Perhaps it's a poor example; that one is always used to browbeat one or the other extreme on abortion. But I think what we'll begin to understand as a judge or justice and also as a litigant or an American living with the ruling decisions and insight of the legal and the legislative environment and the executive enforcement of them is that our traditions are not beyond salvage.

We can save America very easily, it will just take imagination, direction, values, and sustainability to manufacture a livable, free, and moralistic environment that is less unapologetically dismissive of tradition, and with integrity and virtue intact.

 

I forget who's running for President Election but I'll look it up