Supreme court rules against constitution! MUST SEE!!

never ran into that problem

 

I know right.

 

1 more reason to keep your stash in your ass.

 

police d00dz can do the frisk on you even if you're just walking down the street i believe...

i don't see why it wouldn't be any different in a car?

 

i am now moving to canada

 

plain and simple.. don't draw attention to yourself.. and there's no reason for them to fuck with you

 

ah yes.. a country who's government is still ruled in the end by queens law

 

Smart guy.

 

You're incorrect.

 

Fuck Tha Police

 

All I'm reading is that they can search a "passenger". So does this mean the DRIVER can't be searched, but the passenger can be?

 

I just realized it's a frisk, not a search of the car. It's still fucked, but that's not really as bad...it would suck to get caught off guard though.

 

Hello, New World Order!

 

I love that. Ha.

 

It was unanimous, so it's doubtful that anyone appointed soon would disagree with the ruling.

One problem with that is, in some places, the color of your skin will draw attention....or the color of your clothes in this case.

This was the reasoning (from: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2009/01/27/20090127trafficstop0127.html)

So, I guess it was because he was in a "gang neighborhood" and had "gang colors" and a police scanner.

Assuming the scanner was legal, I doubt that's why they thought he was armed. So I guess the "reasonable suspicion" was because of where he was and the color of his clothes.

I can sort of understand the ruling, but I think it's a stretch to apply it in this case.

 

^^^ PS.. most states it is illegal to carry a police scanner in your car.. maybe you should check up on the legalities of that... plus if he was wearing gang colors and just recently got out of prison.. maybe he was in a gang? that little summary doesn't tell you much about the situation..