Study shows feminst women orgasm more

This is evidence to me that soy satisfies. The women who embrace their gender might just be finding men who get the job done more maybe? Or maybe they don't feel bad for enjoying sex? I have noticed women who say they don't like feminism tend to have STRONG opinions on anything women have done since the 60's so that is my opinion. Sex is nasty to them and only for kids or when he asks.

Women who hold anti-feminist attitudes tend to fake orgasms more frequently, study finds

Women also tended to fake orgasms more frequently if they scored higher on a measure of hostile sexism, which describes the belief that women who challenge men’s power are manipulative and subversive.

“Women who hold anti-feminist attitudes don’t have anything holding them back from faking orgasm, whereas women who adopt a feminist worldview may not fake orgasm because it goes against her belief in a woman’s right to pleasure, and her right to talk about sex openly,” Harris explained.

Of course, the reasons for faking an orgasm are multifaceted. “It’s important to keep in mind that some of these effect sizes are small, and we are not trying to tell the whole story of why some women are more likely to fake orgasm than others,” Harris said.

 

It's always S. Rudy's damn fault. Needs to stop drivin' em all to feminism

 

HETERO-SEXIST PIG!!!!!!

 

I think it's possible to both enjoy a nice set or tits and respect them. I am a modern man.

 

At least according to the link title, it's is not being claimed that feminists orgasm more, just that anti-feminist women fake more frequently.

Just saying, "asshole, I didn't orgasm" doesn't count as an orgasm.

Beyond this, about half of all research in the social sciences produces results that can't be verified.

 

That is for studies, this is a srudy.

 

What does this have to do with tits?

You're ignoring the fact that feminists orgasm more because of having sex with their WYMIN partners!

 

Very true
Ssocial science is open to how you see the data. I just thought it was interesting considering the gender roles anti-feminist women embrace. I took the data and applied to my own views on that dynamic.

Interesting to me people can usualy only attack my spelling mistakes and not my ideas. I am very open that I have never been good at that. I think you read that word as intended still.

 

Uhh...I believe the quote above mine in this post is picking apart your ideas.

 

No. While the results of a study could be open to interpretation, if a set of controlled conditions are used to produce the data, other researchers should get the same results when they repeat the study.

Case in point. A study found that when Asian women took academic tests, their scores soared when they focused on the fact that they were Asian before taking the test, yet plunged when they focused on the fact that they were women, thus clearly demonstrating that race and gender are constructs, and that they produce bias.

The problem is that no one who repeated the study found any such effect whatsoever. In other words, the study was complete bullshit blatantly pushing a leftist social agenda.

 

Perhaps you should offer something yourself.

That was my point. You piggyback.

Whatever guys I was half joking and you want to see this as some political stance since you are all alt-right uninformed asses.

Don't be so sensitive.

 

I was full joking

 

Yeah and if you ask the right questions to the right people they will. Results such as this depend on the person. Same idea as how we can find polls that say 85% of people like this and only 60% like it when asked in a different way. Like calling something the affordable health care act vs it's goals without naming it. This is a classic right wing example of statistics and any college professor on this topic will say the same thing.

It's not hard science since opinion is relative. It's not like gravity.

 

Can't help it, you're making me hungry for ribs.

 

What is a Srudy?

 

It seems reasonable to say that if you change the wording of polls or surveys, you may get dramatically different results, while asking what is essentially the same question.

This is different from replicating a study in the sciences, however, including studies in the social sciences. Scientific studies, including studies in the social sciences, have to describe their research methodology in detail. Researchers doing follow-up studies have to use the exact same research methodology to measure the validity of the initial study.

This is not a case where so-and-so just used a completely, or even significantly different research method.

No.

All valid scientific studies will produce the same results when a study is repeated. This applies to both hard science and social science. This is what shows that a scientific study is, in fact, scientific. If something is genuinely scientific, the data produced is not simply relative or a matter of opinion. It is a reproducible result.

 

It's what happens when one thinks too fast and types.

 

Whole lot of mansplaining going on

I dont see any ladies in this thread

 

OK so socially let's say we ask a group of black and poor people their opinions on the police and tax vs white rich people?

We will probably not get the same results on either topic. Sociology depends on the social sources. Humans and our background is not all the same. How broad is your group? If we all all humans will always have the same views it does not work. Your idea does work if we limit the group to white vs black or poor vs. rich.

So if we survey and limit a group based on political views we can follow the same idea. The results are more likely to be the same if we limit the same way again. We honestly would need many more tests on this. Like I said it's just a half joke half tidbit of info.

I did not plan for people to take it so personal.

It has to be the same every time if I want to prove global warming or black holes.

 

Do you ask the fish or the fisherman how to catch the fish? Men have the fishing rod and we know how to use it.