Something interesting you learned recently

When Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet back in 2006, what if anything did your ancient astronaut friends have to say about that?

 

What do you mean? Pluto was already known to exist over 6000 years before modern science rediscovered it.

And yes, it was classified as a planet to the Anunnaki. Pluto is now being researched a lot now too.

Its funny, that every planet or moon satellite that bares any significance to the Sumerians in their history of the Anunnaki, humans and science seem to flock to them, research them more, which I find funny considering modern science also makes claims that it's all a big cosmological fantasy yet their research seems highly involved.

 

People always seem surprised to discover early civilizations had a fascination with the night sky, but it’s not as if they had anything else to watch.
I mean it’s not as if they had FOX News Mesopotamia, Game of Stones, or the Kurdashians to watch on Sunday nights.

 

Not as if they had the telescopes and "data photography" to see any of that, either.

How does a 6000 year civilisation know about the outer solar system before we did in the modern era? Even if they could see Neptune, how did they know it was a liquid water planet when we only discovered that in the 70s? How do they know of the moons that orbit the giants? Modern science agrees that there is probably a larger planet on a very long eliptical orbit of roughly 3600 years that is so far undiscovered based on the inconsistent orbits of pluto and neptune. Sumerians already knew about this stealth planet 6000 years ago.

Now I'm not saying aliens, but I find it all highly unlikely this civilisation, with the technology we are taught they had, hammers and chisels, could even make an accurate guess work like they did so something is amiss here.

Also after extensive computer simulations on how our moon was created, the collision of two unidentified planets, exactly how the Sumerians described, is a realistic plausibility of how it was created. Basically debris from the planets formed our moon and everything else became the asteroid belt in the same location as they described planet Tiamat.

There's too much consistency from science following up these things and researching these significant places and events of pre history.

Its like the pyramid patterns and faces on Mars. We didn't just luck out and accidently discover them. Mars has always been a beacon point in the Anunnaki saga. It's use and colonisation processes have been detailed significantly. They knew where they were looking.

 

This might explain a few things:

Professor Gerald Crabtree, who heads a genetics laboratory at Stanford University in California, has put forward the idea that human intelligence peaked several thousand years ago and from then
on there has been a slow decline in our intellectual and emotional abilities.

Although we are now surrounded by the technological and medical benefits of a scientific revolution, these have masked an underlying decline in brain power.

His argument is based on the fact that for more than 99 per cent of human evolutionary history, we have lived surviving on our wits, leading to big-brained humans.

Professor Crabtree said “I would wager that if an average citizen from Athens of 1000 BC were to appear suddenly among us, he or she would be among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues
and companions, with a good memory, a broad range of ideas. and a clear-sighted view of important issues, - “Furthermore, I would also make this wager for the ancient inhabitants of Africa, Asia, India or the Americas,
of perhaps 2,000 to 6,000 years ago,”

 

Well, that should fill our hearts with hope.

I'm not against a much more advanced civilisation/s back in time. I want to know what's under these oceans. We've apparently mapped out the known universe and know less than 10% of our own oceans.

By design? Maybe we aren't ready to know what lays at the depths. We've already found heaps of ancients cities in the ocean that could change our perception of ancient history, and we can't even get funds to research them properly!

Well I'm ready to know what lays in the depths! I will keep an open and excited mind to find out. It literally can't be that hard hey? Not in this day and age. We could easily map the ocean floor and build 3D models and layouts to see if anything pops. I don't wanna hear no shit about costs either cause it's bullshit, we ought to know what the fuck we are living on.

 

I was going to say something else but I've been distracted by learning that my user number has 69 in it. Never quoted a post with my name in it before.

 

Professor Crabtree sounds like a gambler :-D
But, interesting theory.

 

I'm on a probiotic too (they foster gut health). This seems like a good reason to gorge myself with fancy chocolate bars!

 

:-D

The face on Mars has been debunked as an optical illusion. Are there more faces? I only know of one!

Also, what convinced you that Tiamat was a planet more so than a goddess for the Sumerians? She's also portrayed as the (personification of the) primordial ocean. It seems primarily a typical primordial deity.

 

Yes there's more. There's actually a seminar with Buzz Aldrin talking about them and showing them more. They even found a woman face with a crown. Need a good imagination to see it, but Buzz believes.... Which says a lot to me. Orison posted the seminar maybe 2 years or so ago. It was interesting and popular because of the Astronaut.

Optical illusions lol. Sir something ain't look right here. "Optical illusion!" about as original as ye ol' weather balloon story, you just know it's a load of tripe.

Funny, if anything was going to be an optical illusion from a photograph in space it'd be that data representation of that black hole..... Hahahahahhaa. Nahh I dun believe nothing they tell me. I'm believing Buzz even if he did fake the moon landing the first time around.

 

That rock/mountain that provided the most famous 'face on Mars' pic has been studied again later. It is proven that the photographs from the 70s were optical illusions caused by light and shadow.

That's an artificial rendition of a bunch of data. The only folks I saw acting like it was an actual photo were VG and you

 

Buzz isn't so sure it's an optical illusion.
You'd think one of the first remote control mars rovers would just go back to those same sites, but I reckon they know what they're looking for somewhere else. IGIGI.

 

No, that's what YOU would think

Why would the people behind the mars rovers go back there? It's very expensive to get them there, they are made for ground observation and taking samples, not taking pics of a mountain. And it's already unlikely and debunked its a giant face statue made by aliens. So yeah, the only reason to go there seems because the shape of that mountain could indicate erosion by water.
The mars rovers main goals still are much more basic than you hope: discover elements that could support basic unintelligent life. Explore the geology. Explore possibilities for human colonisation. Of course that's all a cover up for the secret stuff

 

My mind is not changed.

 

That was not why i was exchanging thoughts. I'm also interested in your answer to my question about Tiamat If you don't primarily consider it/her a (former) planet too. I mean the same ancient culture depicts her as those other things.

 

Quanta is plural for quantum.

 

Oh okay sorry I missed this bit.

Well the Sumerian cosmological creation of our solar system says that there were 2 extra celestial beings in our solar system. One was Tiamat which sat where the asteroid belt or and the other was planet Nibiru, the home of the Anunnaki. The two paths crossed which annihilated Tiamat in the collision. Nibiru was then sent out on its 3600 year elliptical orbit. Tiamat was reduced to debris, much of it colliding into Mars and Earth, some of the debris could have even formed our moon. The rest of the planet is scattered within the asteroid belt.

Now what makes it interesting is, the same "properties" I guess, I'm sorry I don't know the correct word.. But when Nibiru and Tiamat collide, their planetary properties infuse together. When the debris cause havoc on Mars and Earth, it is also those same elements being brought from space onto Mars and our planet earth.

I once read that a meteor can bring a string of bacteria and DNA down to earth with it, eventually releasing it into the atmosohere as it burns out. Therefore, earth, Mars and mysterious planet Nibiru (thought to exist these days) or planet X could theoretically have the same elements and properties or very similar to one another.

So it's no surprise the Anunnaki would have colonised and mined Mars and Earth, after all its their cosmological story and they knew exactly where to mine for the gold. the infusion of elements and everything could mean they have very same earthly features as they suggest Mars once had too.

I'm just yet too finalise how and why a culture that couldn't possibly know any of that stuff actually came up with the idea. With their proposed technologies and life, they couldn't have possibly seen as much to have even concieved a depiction so accurate that even modern science is looking into things and I've heard numerous times now about how thay asteroid belt was made and a lot of signs point to an obliterated planet.

 

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk gave his adopted daughter Sabiha surname Gökçen (after the introduction of the Surname Law), which means "belonging or relating to the sky".
She soon developed a passion for flying and went on to become the world's first female combat pilot.
Istanbuls's second airport now carries her name.