3 million dollars have been spent investigating 9/11. 50 million dollars were spent investigating the Challenger explosion. Hmm...
ahh yes, pentagon thing was faked too. of course they wanted to keep it quieter, and they did, cause, it's kinda obvious once you look at the facts.
Wow....since it is extremely obvious that our very own govt orchestrated these attacks, what's next? I predict "Chinese" terrorists working for the "Chinese" govt will fly planes into the Sears Tower and other landmarks....Mount Rushmore...etc etc. It's been done before.
I don't know. I don't think we'd want to get involved with the Chinese... at least not yet. That would be bad. Very bad.
why? I heard that movie really sucks. I haven't watched it, and I think that Michael Moore is as much of a liar as Bush.
Well, he doesn't make real documentaries, and he bends the facts. The movie is funny as Hell though, I think... erm, except for the parts where people are crying.
vewwwy itewesting. How about this one. In July, before 9/11, US representatives visited a number of countries around Afghanistan and told them, quietly, that they were going in in October. Turkey, Pakistan, India..... Or this one.... a multinational consortium of oil companies tried for 3 years to get the Taliban to approve a pipeline across Afghanistan to supply Pakistan with Natural Gas, but the Taliban would not budge. This was billions of dollars in potential revenues for these oil companies, held up by the Taliban.
lucifer_sam no it doesnt paint the entire picture but it lays out facts that people need to know. and to everyone else, you cant lie and make a documentary, you have to have sources and proof. rednecks
lol did you just call us rednecks? I'm just saying that Moore is a biased piece of shit and he used pictures of Saddam's murderees and said that the U.S. killed them.
Bowling for columbine was pretty damn good... his movies aren't always fully truthful and they are biased, but they're really good.
I agree George, though I think Bowling For Columbine was better than Fahrenheit 9/11. 'Twas more entertaining.
They really aren't biased in the way that the media such as Fox or CNN are biased, it's his own views, really.
He's extremely liberal (which isn't a bad thing) and the views he pushes in his movies are extremely liberal. He's a lying piece of shit because he used pictures of people Saddam killed and said that the U.S. killed them (in Fahrenheit 9/11). I remember reading about it when the movie came out, and surprisingly, corporate news didn't run with the story like you would expect them too. Yes, the troops are slaughtering civilians in Iraq. But he should've gotten pictures of the US troops doing the massacres.
Or he could have used pictures of niceraguans being slaughtered by colombians and such... vice versa, said it was the US with Iraq.
how does he push his views. either you choose to watch him or you dont. man, the media has a grip on all of you, and u dont even realize it