So I've slept with over 100 people...

oops double post

 

I’m not disagreeing with most of what you’re saying. The problem I have is people like MJ who will have you believe that your life is in danger every time you sleep with somebody. That’s BS and you and I both know it.

Sure, having a higher number of partners can open you up to more opportunities for contracting STIs, but it’s NOT a given. A virgin, or someone who doesn’t sleep around and has only had 2-3 partners can catch an STI just as easily as the person who’s had 100+ partners. There are people that have many different partners and never catch anything. And there are people that have only a couple that end up catching something nasty and incurable.

So let’s stop with the false and misleading info when it comes to stds. No need to exaggerate the reality. And it’s certainly wrong to “assume” that this chic (or anyone else for that matter) is a walking STI simply because of the number of partners she’s had.

 

I have an STI. Here's a pic

View attachment 50504

 

Do you fire blanks,Ivory? [fnur fnur]

 

If I were to pick a drunk chick up at the bar tonight and bring her home.....I'd put all kinds of meaning into it. Emotions too.

Because you hold nothing to be good about a certain act doesn't mean it's not cherished by others. Not everyone who sleeps around is some kind of cheap dirty scoundrel like you make them out to be.

 

What a bunch of people in this thread don't get is that values systems are socially driven. If anyone could say their lifestyle choices were morally equivalent as every other than pedophilia, incest, bestiality and rape would be just as valid sexual lifestyles as any other.

Since clearly they are not it follows that society, not individuals determines sexual mores. Most people are not promiscuous, most people are monogamous, therefore those who are promiscuous are by definition abnormal.

I get that promiscuous people are wired differently and probably no amount of arguing will cause them to stop their behavior. It doesn't affect me and probably never will unless one of these sexual monsters prey upon my son or daughter and hurt them. I think these people should read a disclaimer before each sexual encounter, something like

I may share my bed and body with you, I may engage in the most intimate activities with you, I may give you extreme pleasure and or let you please me but please don't think these intimacies mean anything or that I have any interest in sleeping only with you or even sleeping with you again. So, if by sleeping with me you may develop feelings for me or wish to repeat this encounter than for your own good I feel compelled to stop what we are doing and part ways. However, if you can engage in these activities without having the slightest feelings about me or the experience than I am in.

 

A facile and weak argument. There are any number of reasons as to why those "choices" are prohibited, only one such reason is societal. By the way it's "then" not "than".

Ah yes. Just as anyone who is different to me is abnormal. How do you arrogate to yourself the right to determine normality?

Promiscuous people are monsters? How does that leap of non-logic follow?

Then, not than.

Many people share sex without love. Who are you to tell them they are abnormal monsters?

 

my theory is that OP and this fx character are the same person. dedicated trolling.

 

Hello Dangeroustype!

Well, clearly your post has sparked quite a bit of interest in everyone here in Hipforums. That's sort of revealing, if one thinks about it. This intense interest (nearly 200 responses already! Mainly from men, I think) does (I think) underscore a rather unfortunate societal group-think regarding the sexuality of women and how our society still, sadly, gravitates toward repressing female sexuality, even those who might otherwise profess sentiments of encouraging "sexual liberation." Now, I'm not suggesting anyone here would throw you in jail for having many partners; but their responses really seem to me to reveal a strange anxiety about you (or any woman) truly exercising your liberation. I'm a man who's not had nearly as many partners as you but I say (based upon reading and considering your original post), "Kudos to you! If you're happy, keep doing it (just keep up on the protection for obvious reasons!)!" You're absolutely NOT a "slut"!! (A word with rather clear negative connotations and one pointedly used often as a subliminal weapon against women expressing their sexual liberation).

There's a lot more I could comment on here but I don't really want to take the time. I would encourage you (or anyone) to read the book "Sex at Dawn" (google it) which brings an academic approach and critical, honest analysis and deconstruction of human sexuality. It's a great read! In a nutshell: "Natural" human sexuality differs profoundly from the rather "unnatural", repressive and controlling mores of Western Culture. This is still the case despite our relatively recent progress in liberating sex. Humans evolved to live in groups where EVERYTHING is shared including sexual partners. It's your Life, enjoy it!! : )

 

Ok, here's my 2 cents: you are one of the illustrious 1% in the sex game, meaning you evidently have no problem rounding up willing and able partners. In the days of lore, institutions such as the church sanctified marriage ensured there woul basically be one man to every woman: a kind of sexual communism, if you will. But with the sexual revolution of the 1960s a new sexual order emerged in which unregulated sex 'markets' mean some people, like yourself, find yourself swimming in cock/**** or both, while others must make do with masturbation and online porn. Needless to say people calling you a slut or whore will tend to be overrepresented in the latter category. I say just enjoy your good fortune.

 

Keep trying to trump up dangerous behavior as something emotionally meaningful. Its not going anyone anywhere.

If you picked up a drunk chick and brought her home for sex, you'd be taking advantage of her for your own ego, not because you genuinely care about her.

 

I agree that values systems are socially driven and defined in certain aspects, with a large influence from evolution affecting how our brains are wired as the human species to continue the human species.

I don't know about people who engage in incest or bestiality, but I can say that the brain of a pedophile is wired differently in terms of how it can get sexually aroused from visual stimuli.

The average brain of a Teleiophile, a person attracted to adults, shows a difference in brain activity from looking at adults they find attractive vs children; pedophiles being the inverse of that brain activity reaction. So I'm just pointing out there is a physiological-neurological difference.

And don't equate promiscuity with incest, bestiality, and/or pedophilia, they are completely separate conditions, with promiscuity not necessarily even being related to physiological-neurological differences.

 

How do people just run into sex like that. I don't understand it. I try so hard to get laid and it hasn't happened yet

 

interesting notion. and it could be true! I never thought of it that way before

 

my guess would be that the difference is that you have a penis.



oh wait, aren't you the person who said that a girl looking at a guy "a certain way" is making it easy for him? maybe you are a girl, and the fact that you think making facial expressions is "trying so hard" to get laid is the reason it hasn't happened yet.

 

You're trying too hard! Just have fun and relax, it will happen at the right time. :afro:

 

fx what the fuck is your problem? This is supposed to be a haven for sexually liberated women. You're turning this place into another microcosm of society, full of double standard crap (can't turn a ho into a housewife) and vile sex-negative judgments. Btw, not all of us want to get married.

 

i was not aware of that. i thought it was supposed to be (as advertised at least) a place where you can voice your opinion, no matter what it is.

 

It's more of a haven for people who like to argue.

Good call. I agree. It almost seems obvious now.

 

Damn , someone has been feeding the troll big time in this thread.


OP = expert troll.

Seriously, OP just took a very controversial topic (knowingly) and added most of the stereotypes/stigmas that come with it, and started argueing it. Same thing as me posting "Hi im a successful male with high morals who enjoys using women for sexual profit and takes advantage of them all the time, but why does this bother so many people? , Discuss"

 

This.

Samantha, what the fuck is your problem? He is just stating his opinion. Thats what forums are for.