Yes. The average child will watch 8,000 murders on TV before finishing elementary school. By age eighteen, the average American has seen 200,000 acts of violence on TV, including 40,000 murders. Television statistics. Its not like there innocent and don't know what guns are yet. Every "action" TV show or movie constant gunfire.
WSJ NEWS The Secret Deal That Put a Real Rifle Into ‘Call of Duty’ Remington signed product-placement deal with Activision to reach young gamers, newly released documents show WSJ News Exclusive | The Secret Deal That Put a Real Rifle Into ‘Call of Duty’
Gun Safety should be taught in schools. While the number of firearms in circulation has risen significantly the last 30 years, the number of gun owners has followed suit. And with the loosening of concealed carry laws in many states, children are much more likely to come in contact with a gun. I’d say Kindergarten thru High School should have some kind of curriculum.
There are specific institutions created just for the purpose of teaching gun safety. These places specialize in this and should be used for the purpose they were meant. Trying to get a teacher at a public school, who probably has never fired a weapon, to try and teach children a comprehensive skill like gun safety, gun cleaning and gun etiquette, when they already have 30 student and are in volved in mat, or english or other subjects, is just recipe for disaster. Leave Math to the Math Teachers, and leave Gun Safety to the Gun Safety Experts. 511 Tactical has stores and ranges, nationwide, and offers comprehensive course in use & carry of firearms..
I think so depending on how it's implemented. Arizona had such a bill but I haven't heard much of its progress recently. Arizona House advances bill mandating public schools offer firearms safety training (azpbs.org)
It’s time for this nation to disarm…..period. Specific uses like hunting should have prerequisite training. Guns sold for other special uses should have required training paid for by the gun manufacturers. The other 90% of us don’t need guns or training.
At school of all places? I'm unconvinced. The best route remains to simply restrict the number of people you concede to hold a gun by having said people demonstrate they can own one for mere deterrence or safety without endangering anyone, themselves included. Sure, even in that case incidents may happen, but by restricting usage you also drammatically lower the chances of such incidents happening.
No. Why would you do that? Sex is a basic drive or instinct, necessary for the continuation of all animal life. The young need to know what it is all about and how it works. Guns, in the hands of civilians, are a fetish. Unnecessary and problematic. They have no instinctive or necessary reason to be in the hands of civilians. (No, not even for hunting). What should be taught is Civics (how our government is supposed to work), tolerance for others, respect, logic, rational thinking, problem solving, how to do research, history, science, ethics and morals, and a few other subjects. Then we wouldn't need guns in the hands of civilians.
Currently, in the USA, Fatalities due to Automobiles is running neck and neck with Gun Fatalities. I don't hear anyone crying out to ban cars, or for more regulation on who can and can't buy cars. FACT: A Firearm is a tool like any other. It is the User that is responsible for the end result of the use of the tool. I've said it before, A Hammer, or Screwdriver can be just as deadly. And for those who shout "Ranged Weapon!" we also aren't lobbying to get rid of Bows and Arrows. Education, and enforcement of consequences for misuse. There are plenty of laws, we don't need more.
I would wager that the hours spent legitimately driving on highways in, say Ohio, exceed all the hours legitimately using guns in the entire country. Want to compare gun deaths now with 1970? We have a plethora of laws covering driving including licenses, insurance, and required safety features. Put the same restrictions on gun use and sales and watch the deaths plummet. The lack of restrictions on guns in America shocks the rest of the world and has nothing to do with liberty or freedom.
None of your argument has any validity. On average Americans drive their cars 46 minutes each day. There are no Americans who shoot their guns for 46 minutes each day and an automobile is not designed to kill people, they are designed for transportation and are a necessary tool for modern civilian society. A gun is not a necessary tool for modern civilian society. There are laws that define how automobiles are designed and built, how they may be altered, how and by whom they are operated in public arenas, what type of fuel they may use, how they are maintained, how the manufacturer may be held accountable, how they may be recalled, how they are stored, how they are retailed, how they are insured, and how they are disposed of; and certain types are outlawed in the U.S. For example the Porsche 959, Lamborghini Diablo Strosek, Fiat 126P, etc. FACT: A firearm is not a tool like any other. A firearm is design with one purpose in mind and one purpose only, to kill. A hammer is designed to impact nails, metal, etc., a screwdriver's purpose is to drive screws. Neither is designed to kill. The fact that a hammer or screwdriver can be used to kill is irrelevant to the argument. Anything can be used to kill. For example a needle can kill you, a pillow can kill you, a monkey wrench can kill you. However none of those are designed to kill you. As you note a firearm is usually, but not necessarily, a ranged weapon. However the maximum range of a bow is 200 to 500 yards. The maximum range for a firearm such as an AR15 is 3900 yards or about 2 1/4 miles. Snipers have registered kills at 2 miles. In addition the maximum rate of fire of a gun is 6,000 rounds per minute. A civilian semi automatic AR15 rate of fire is 45 rounds per minute. With minor alterations, such as a bump stock, a civilian AR15 can be fired at about 300 rounds per minute by any reasonable individual. Today an expert archer can fire about 10 arrows a minute. A compound bow fires an arrow at about 300 to 340 feet per second. An AR15 .223 flies at more than 3,200 feet per second and I won't get into various bullet designs such as hollow point and armor piecing designed to impart maximum damage. We need as many new laws as we need. Just becasue some laws have become outdated or ineffectual doesn't mean a new law isn't justified.
Word Salad. Alternating Current wasn't Designed to Kill People. But Edison went to great lengths to prove it was. It isn't that the laws are outdated, it's that they aren't being enforced. There is a difference. And as to the length of time people spend in their cars? I'm sure the millions spending hours a day in their cars commuting would disagree. I believe that Firearms DO have a place in Modern Society. And that may indeed be coming from the fact that I was a victim of violent crime involving guns, but that is the point. Making laws limiting the use of firearms by the average citizen is NOT going to stop the criminals from getting and using them. It just isn't. That has been shown over and over.
What does word salad mean? How about addressing the issues? Edison never went to great lengths to prove that AC current was designed to kill people. He was concerned that it was more dangerous than DC current. So, okay, some laws aren't being enforced. Doesn't mean that new laws may be necessary. Do you understand what average means in relation to time spent driving? Some people drive more than 46 minutes a day, some less. What you believe is one thing. What the facts are may be another. Who ever said firearm laws will stop each and every lawless use? Do assault and battery laws eliminate all assault and battery? Maybe we should eliminate them and just allow the biggest and strongest to beat up anyone they want. And how about unnecessary accidents involving firearms due to the ridiculous amount and type in the general public?
Really? Last I checked, Edison began by paying children to bring him stray cats and dogs and electrocuting them publicly. When that no longer had the intended effect he Electrocuted a Circus Elephant. It was also Edison that recommended that a Westinghouse A/C Generator be used to power the electric chair instead of Direct Current. Criminals routinely remove serial numbers from firearms. Lawful users never have a need to file off serial numbers. How is a law making it illegal to file off serial numbers anything but superfluous? Averages collected by firms designed to spew statistics are different from actual averages. Numbers taken from Insurance Companies do not reflect reality, and Numbers collected by Law Enforcement and Public Services are better but still inaccurate. Due to Insurance rates being higher the more you drive, the "Average" person buying car insurance will fudge their total driving hours in order to get a lower rate. Also, the Average person on the road will actively try to avoid being noticed by Police and usually get off the road or move away from road crews. I've driven the same distances in Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, New Orleans, and Chicago, and during the busiest times of day (Commute times) Drive times can exceed 2 or more hours for distances that can be covered in minutes in off hours. I question the attitudes, intentions and morals of ANYONE that tells me that Education is unnecessary. Nothing in society is natural and inborn. You must be taught how to interact with society. And of Course Firearms are "Tools" by your own admission, the fact that you do no believe it is a tool does not make it fact. Tool is described as "a device or implement, especially one held in the hand, used to carry out a particular function." The function need not be specified. Firearms do have a function. If you do not treat a firearm as a tool, if you do not take care of them, maintain them and learn to use them then it is your own fault when something goes wrong and someone gets hurt. You are making my points for me here. Every Politician who has introduced Firearm Legislation has claimed that it will "Take Guns out of the Hands of Criminal." yet never does for some weird reason. (Imagine all that) No the laws don't stop Assaults or Batteries, but adding new laws covering the same crimes won't stop them either. Methods of Enforcement need to be streamlined and put to use. The biggest and Strongest ALREADY believe that might makes right. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't have young men wandering the streets attacking older people in broad daylight for clicks and likes on Instagram. What you call "Unnecessary Accidents," can all be traced to Improper handling, or storage of the firearms or lack of knowledge and understand of how they work or how to properly handle them. Once Again the desperate need for Education involving Firearms.
You stated that Edison went to great lengths to prove that AC current was designed to kill people. Hippolyte Pixii in 1832 was the first to build an AC generator. George Westinghouse discovered that AC power could be stepped up and transferred over greater distances than DC current, up to seven miles from the generating plant. DC power could only be transmitted 1 mile from the plants. Westinghouse installed an AC system in Pittsburgh, PA forming the Westinghouse Electric Company in 1886. AC lines carried voltages of up to 6,000 volts in comparison to Edison's DC 110volt system. Edison saw the AC system as a danger and his system was losing ground as it required more expensive copper and more generators. AC current is more dangerous, and deaths did result from it's usage (and still do)...but it was not designed to kill people. Edison did not pay children to bring him stray cats and dogs to kill with AC power, that was Harold Pitney Brown an electrical engineer. The animals were killed at at Columbia College. On December 5, 1888 Brown killed four calves and a horse at Edison's West Orange laboratory. The elephant, named Topsy, was killed by a combination of AC power and poison at Coney Island at the direction of Frederic Thompson and Elmer "Skip" Dundy, owners of Luna Park. Not Edison. She was killed ten years after the current "war" between Westinghouse and Edison was over. Superintendent of Prisons Austin Lathrop was the one who asked Brown, not Edison, to supply the electric chair. He conspired with Thomson-Houston, another rival of Westinghouse to supply the prison with Westinghouse equipment in an attempt to dirty their image. How does the failure to obey any law make it superfluous? We have laws against murder...but people still get murdered. By your logic we should allow any one to be murdered at any time, as criminals routinely murder people at the law doesn't prevent all murders. I see. If the data doesn't support your conclusion, the data is wrong. So, you are telling me that gun usage and car usage is the same. People shoot guns just as much as they drive cars. The numbers are the same. Public schools only operate for a set number of hours and days. In PA it's 450 hours per year for 12 years. In that time not everything can be taught, so we must be selective. There are far more important subjects that need to taught in that time period. I never said a gun wasn't a tool. I said it was a tool designed to kill, unlike an automobile that is a tool designed for transportation. Every politician? Here's just one that didn't say that: You must remember her. She was a Representative for Arizona's 8th congressional district. She was shot in the head in an attempted assassination by a man with a 9mm pistol containing 33 rounds. Six people were killed and 19 wounded. The shooter had no criminal background other than being cited for possession of drug paraphernalia (nobody on this site ever possessed that stuff), and defacing a sign. So much for every politician. What other points did I "make" for you? Gun safety instruction would help to lessen gun accidents? Sure. Let's pass a law making every gun owner pass a gun safety test once a year, to be held at the local gun shop at the owner's expense. No need to spend public money and public school time.
I do not see the reason unless there is a general pre-military education as a pert of the wider conscription system. Otherwise I like the system that most countries in Europe have - it is not impossible to get a gun (as sometimes people Stateside seem to think), but it is tightly regulated including mandatory training, unless it is for sports or hunting purposes as those already imply training (mandatory to het a hunting licence, and competitive shooting is obvious). Also health checks, mandatory reports by the family physician (but that requires the state free healthcare system) in case of sudden health changes that might affect safety, various requirements related to carry and storage etc, but this is about training.