I know in Europe, and possibly other places, Holocaust Denial is a crime. In fact, from what I understand, in Germany it is a pretty serious crime. I am not saying the SCOTUS would allow such a thing here. But just speaking hypothetically, and yes I say a little half-heartedly, Should climate denial be illegal? oliceman:
Besides, I think what you mean is anthopomorphic climate change denial, often confused with climate change denial. Noone is denying that there's a climate, or that it changes.
Since when should it be illegal to have an opinion, especially one that contradicts mainstream establishment thought? Any time you seek to ban free speech, it sets an ugly precedent, but sadly one many so-called liberals seem to embrace. There is absolutely ZERO evidence of climate change being manmade. Zilch. Zero. None. The only "evidence" is based on correlation, while ignoring the evidence that shows that there were times in the earth's incredibly long history when CO2 levels were a lot higher than they are today, while at the same time the temperatures were substantially lower. Climate change proponents like to conveniently look at only the very short period of time the weather has actually been recorded, while ignoring things like ice core samples which blow the "man made" ruse clear out of the water. The fact that there are actually people who want to abolish contrarian opinions about climate change speaks volumes. The fact is so-called climate change is all about control and restricting human activity, so it makes sense that certain powerful people would also want to restrict people who challenge the official THEORY (which is all that it is).
Yes, people are easily triggered by this topic. Most of them have never looked at the actual science, only the alarmist propaganda disseminated by corporate media and globalist institutions like the UN. Climate change proponents are actually the ones who are anti-science. Bring on the shit storm.
The ruling elite or whatever you want to call them know climate change is real and man-made. They want environmental catastrophe as this is one of the best ways to depopulate the planet whilst they migrate to gated castles in safe areas of the World. Of course this is just my theory.
People have the right to be stupid. It's important to allow the freedom of speech and thought to deny scientific evidence if you want because it's a slippery slope. Who decides what can be said? The problem is now people think their feeling is just as good as fact. "Alternative facts"
You seem smart on other topics. But on some you just repeat the standard buzz words of the party. I mean is there some sort of meeting where you get these? Because out of the blue everyone just says them. Like your post here, I never heard of the "tears" until Trump won.
OK, so if you disagree with agenda being pushed by the MSM then by default you are stupid and basing your judgment on emotions?
There is scientific fact to back climate change. Yes the media can lie to you but this is not a lie. What would they gain by not telling the truth? So yes when it comes to climate change you are stupid and basing your opinion on the emotions that someone you don't like said it happens so it is not happening.
All it does it affect certain industries ability to make money. If you regulate those industries their profits are less. You would fit in well in America because you too seem to think it's all made up by the Chinese so they can invade us. I don't know what to say to people like you. There is an overwhelming consensus of what is going on. It goes beyond any local goverment.