Sandy Hoax And The Boston Bombings

I see . . .

 

What caught my eye was you jumped all over thedope for something that he posted that was a direct quote from the report... His post started with "55". To me that looked like a footnote number from something. So I googled his post and the official report came up. So I posted the report link for you to read. Read it.


I have not read it. I'm not going to read it, because I don't give a fuck... Get it!

 

More DNA mishaps, perhaps.

Also, from the 00122616 report, on the Bushmaster Rifle:

Swabbing was done on all parts of the rifle and cartridges (this rifle was in the school with him and was said by the coroner to have been the source of the shots fired that day)…here are the results of DNA comparisons to Adam Lanza and his mother:
From the conclusion in the report of the DNA samples taken from the rifle (all DNA samples taken, not just some): (go to page 5-6 of the report via left navigation)

“The results showed that only ONE DNA sample was from Adam Lanza, and that was the sample they took from HIS LIVER. ALL DNA SAMPLES FROM THE RIFLE WERE FOUND NOT TO HAVE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER NANCY LANZA OR ADAM LANZA. HOWEVER, A CHECK OF THE CONNECTICUT AND NATIONAL CONVICTED OFFENDER DNA Database DID HAVE A MATCH…”

From 00124235 report: (see page 5 using left navigation)
“The DNA Results eliminate both Nancy Lanza and Adam Lanza as the source of DNA found on the drivers front door handle and drivers exterior door handle on the suspect vehicles car as well as the gun. “

http://sleepbutawhile.com/2014/01/12/inconvenient-truth-60-the-sandy-hook-police-report/

 

Yeah, I get that. But it begs the question of why you would participate in things you don't give a fuck about. I won't engage you any more.

 

So you don't know whose DNA was found as you claimed.

 

You are being absent-minded.

ALL DNA SAMPLES FROM THE RIFLE WERE FOUND NOT TO HAVE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER NANCY LANZA OR ADAM LANZA. HOWEVER, A CHECK OF THE CONNECTICUT AND NATIONAL CONVICTED OFFENDER DNA Database DID HAVE A MATCH…”

Do you understand what that means?

 

so who was the match?

 

We win at bingo?

 

No, it means that there are things that you choose to ignore.

 

Here, I'll give you another chance to honestly assess what you've already assessed without having first seen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgq6SVbIbAI

And this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw9MJu9FyxQ

 

k, storch... been lurking on this thread a lil. and i for one have no clue and just want you to tell us.



edit bashes head into a damn WALL

 

I figured people would google it. It's always better for people to find these things out for themselves. But would you believe that the convicted felon whose DNA matched the DNA found on the .22 caliber shell casings and other things found at the crime scene has not been disclosed. That means that it is either classified or has been somehow scrubbed.

 

Sorry I'm just lazy right now with having almost no time ... I'm pretty much a 24 hour milk machine and any spare second I can get...

I'd say classified... Idk really. I thought you knew and you wanted us to guess. Shrugs.

 

What I see storch in the first video is this guy rambling for better than 11 minutes creating impressions in the imaginative mind before you ever see the subject of his rant. Upon finally getting to see and hear the subject I detected nothing out of order regardless the commentators suggestion that if we don't then we must be seriously disturbed. I can't believe you fall for that obvious hypnotic effort at suggestion.

 

Where are you getting these quotes from, the link you provide here? I read the states report in it's entirety and these quotes are not in it.

 

so in other words you were completely full of shit when you said you knew who the match was.

and stop posting those videos, they don't prove anything except how gullible you are. Like thedope pointed out, more eloquently than me, all it proves is you're falling for the 11 minutes of bullshit the narrator is feeding his audience. There is nothing suspicious about the original video. Give yourself a few weeks to wash the brainwashing off and watch the original video WITH NO NARRATION. Its sad really how easily people fall for that.

 

Sorry, but I didn't listen to the guy's comentary in the video. I have no patience for that. And I can't believe that you fall for Gene Rosen's out of sinc account of what happened to him. After the camera man's gasp, Gene realized that he'd fucked up, and he discontinued his account. Of course, your earlier assessment which was based on what you had yet to see and hear helps me to understand the bias from which you are operating. You engaged in condemnation before examination which is usually, if not always, the result of brainwashing.

You forgot to comment on Robbie Parker's performance.

And you never didn answer the question of which version of Gene Rosen's account you find most believable.

 

I think that the bigger problem concerning "brainwashing" is your inability to understand what it means that the name of the convicted felon whose DNA has been found on the .22 caliber shell casings involved in the murder of Nancy Lanza, and the envelope mentiioned earler has thus far not been disclosed. Your lack of curiosity and acceptance of withheld information is astounding.

Here is something for you and thedope. Scroll down to the bottom of the page. Tell me what you think, and please try to contain your hostility.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-YeEgq5sO7NdkJCQkRxWlZKeEE/edit?usp=sharing

 

I never stated I wasn't curious, I just don't know enough to draw any conclusions. Neither do you.

 

So, you have no comment on what you clearly saw at the bottom of the page I just linked to? OK . . .