I once heard a conservative say that the Supreme Court pulled things like Roe v. Wade out of thin air. They did not. They never did that. Some of Trump's appointees may. But members of the Supreme Court have always been qualified. So Roe v. Wade was somewhere in the Constitution. Because some rights in the Constitution are so basic, they don't have to be written. Some rights are there because when our founders wrote the Bill of Rights, they couldn't write down everything a right involved. The right to an attorney for example, means that your attorney is qualified obviously. And some rights have been found as the Consitution has been interpreted in later years, just adding more to existing rights. In a political science class I took in 1997, the book pointed out no court has ever found any academic rights in the Constitution (the right to research diseases for example), because there is nothing the Constitution about that. But there has to be something there about abortion, or the Supreme Court wouldn't have ruled that way. And the Supreme Court has said that the right to privacy found with Roe v. Wade is found in the penumbras of the first, third, fourth, fifth, ninth and 14th amendments. So it is somewhere there. Almost all conservative judges up till they started appointing originalists to the courts would agree that there is a general right to privacy in the Constitution, but maybe not a right to an abortion. But Roe v. Wade was also precedent. And like the book also said in that 1997 class, when you want to overturn a precedent even like Roe v. Wade you become the judicial activist.
But speaking of social issues, like Roe v. Wade, I am proud to live in Michigan. Even though it has always been a traditionally Republican state and I am a lifelong Democrat. We have always been on the cutting edge of social movements. We've never had the death penalty as a state. And interracial marriage was always legal here.