Reincarnation verses Rebirth

Discussion in 'Philosophy and Religion' started by MeAgain, Feb 3, 2023.

  1. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,446
    Likes Received:
    14,572
    The concept of reincarnation is sometimes confused with the notion of rebirth even thought the two are different. In fact if you search the web you will usually find that the two are considered to be the same thing.
    But there is a difference.

    Reincarnation is the transmigration of the soul, or self, from one body to another.
    Rebirth is the forming of a new self that has been influenced by a different self in the past.
    So to able to reincarnate in a new body there must be a continuation of the self, or essential nature, of the individual.
    In popular Hinduism this essential nature or self is called the Atman. The Atman does not change from one incarnation to the next.

    Now this can get complicated but I’ll try to keep it simple.
    The Atman in some schools of Hinduism is separate from the ultimate reality, which is Brahmin.
    In some schools the Atman is part of Brahmin, but not identical.
    And some schools claim that the Atman and Brahmin are identical once the veil of ignorance, sometimes called samsara, is lifted.

    However Hinduism derived from the Vedas and the oldest school or thought that derived from the Vedas is Vedanta. The oldest extant form of Vedanta is Advaita or nondual Vedanta.
    In non dual Vedanta there is only one reality and as such there can be no individual Atman and Brahmin, and thus no true self. As there is no self, there is nothing to reincarnate.
    So in some forms of Hinduism there is no reincarnation.
    Buddhism agrees with the Advaita School on this point.

    In Buddhism the self is not real, it has no distinct existence but instead is formed from the interaction of matter, sensations experienced by the body, the interpretation of sensory input, the mental actions triggered by the sensory input, and the consciousness of the previous occurrences. These are called the Five Aggregates, and they are all interdependent, they rely on each other.
    The self is an illusion or construct of the Five Aggregates.
    Now as there is no self, there is nothing to reincarnate.
    The self is merely an interaction of energy.

    But as everything, including matter, is energy, and as various forms of energy interact with one another, and as energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it will always persist.
    As the self is itself an interaction of energy, at the time of death the part of the energy field that consisted of matter is transformed by bodily decay thus breaking the chain of the Five Aggregates and the self is destroyed.

    But the energy field persists in an altered form as energy cannot be destroyed.
    It must be remembered that everything is energy and the self, consisting of the Five Aggregates is only one part of the total energy field of the universe.
    It exists within or as part of all the energy in existence.
    And as all forms of energy interact with each other, each “individual” energy field, known as an individual being or self, always interacts with the total field.
    Upon death this interaction does not end, but continues in an altered form, without the individual self.
    As it continues it interacts with the greater field and when the first of the Five Aggregates in the form of a body, or matter, again arises, a new self also arises as the Five Aggregates are again interacting.
    As the new self has been influenced by the total energy field, and in particular the altered energy field of a previous conglomerate of the five Aggregates, it is imprinted with that energy pattern.
    There is no continuous self that has reincarnated, but a new self is reborn influenced by a previous energy pattern.

    An analogy might be that of a pool of water, which represents all of reality or the total energy field.
    As the energy within that pool interacts, individual whirlpools, or selves, come into existence. Each whirlpool seems to be independent, but they all influence each other as they twirl and spin, as they are all disturbing the entire pool of water.

    Eventually one may stop whirling. It ceases to exist and a new whirlpool may form. But the energy from the deceased whirlpool will affect the formation of the new, or reborn whirlpool. The former whirlpool had a certain direction of rotation, speed, depth, diameter and so on. All of which is present in the large pool of water and will have an affect on any new, or reborn whirlpool’s development.

    Even thought the two whirlpools are in fact different and seemingly independent, the new reborn whirlpool has been affected by the previous dying whirlpool.

    In contrast to reincarnation, the same whirlpool, or self, has not continued in a new form, or body.
    A new whirlpool, or self, has been reborn in a new form, or body, but it is not the same whirlpool, it is a new one that has been influenced by the previous one.
     
    Tishomingo, oldguynurse and Piobaire like this.
  2. Piobaire

    Piobaire Village Idiot

    Messages:
    4,976
    Likes Received:
    8,676
    If you believe in rebirth, I'd suggest the Noble Eightfold Path, which accrues spiritual merit leading to an auspicious rebirth.

    If you don't believe in rebirth, I'd suggest the Noble Eightfold Path, as it can demonstrably lead to the amelioration of suffering in this life.
     
    MeAgain likes this.
  3. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,446
    Likes Received:
    14,572
    The question was asked,"How did I reach this understanding of Reincarnation v Rebirth, and what books I had read to help me".
    I have provided a bibliography, as asked, of most of the books that led me to this conclusion.
    I can't really point to one book or books..
    Hope this helps.


    Ajaan Maha Boowa Nanasampanno, (2004) Venerable Ācariya Mun Bhuridatta Thera: A Spiritual Biography.
    Arguelles, Jose and Miriam, (1972) Mandala. Shambhala Press, Berkeley and London

    Burtt, E. A., (1955) The Teachings of the Compassionate Buddha, Early Discourses the Dhammapada and Later Basic Writings. New American Library, New York and Scarborough, Ontario

    Chang, Garma C. C., (1959) The Practice of Zen. Harper& Row, New York
    Chatterji, J.C., (1980) The Wisdom of the Vedas. Quest Books, Ill
    Cleary, Thomas, (1989) Zen Lessons, The Art of Leadership. Barnes and Noble with Shambala Press.
    Conze, Edward, (1951) Buddhism: It’s Essence and Development. Harper & Row, New York

    Dalai Lama, H. H. the, (1975) The Buddhism of Tibet. Snow Lion Publications, New York
    Dalai Lama, H. H. the, (1997) Sleeping, Dreaming, Dying, An Exploration of Consciousness with the Dalai Lama. Wisdom Publications, Boston, MA
    Dalai Lama, H. H. the, (1999) Ethics for the New Millennium. Riverhead Books, NY
    Dalai Lama, H. H. the, (2003) Destructive Emotions, A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama. Narrated by Daniel Goleman. Bantam Books.
    Dalai Lama, H. H. the, (2004) The Wisdom of Forgiveness. Riverhead Books, NY
    Das, Lama Surya, (1992) The Snow Lion’s Turquoise Mane. Harper, San Franciso Das, Lama Surya, (2001) Awakening the Buddhist Heart. Broadway Books, New York
    Das, Ram, (1971) Remember, Be Here Now. Crown Publishing, NY
    Das, Ram, (1976) Grist for the Mill. Unity Press, Santa Cruz
    Das, Ram, (1978) Journey of Awakening. Bantam Books, NY
    Dhiegh, Khigh Alx, (1973) The Eleventh Wing, an Exposition of the Dynamics of the I Ching for Now Dell, NY

    Eisen, William, (1989) The Universal Language of Cabalah. DeVorss, Ca
    Evans-Wentz, W.Y., (1960) The Tibetan Book of the Dead. Oxford University Press, London

    Fields, Rick, (1975) Loka, A Journal from Naropa Institute. Anchor Books, Garden City, New York
    Feng, Gia-Fu Feng and Kirk, Jerome, (1970) Tai Chi A Way of Centering & I Ching. Collier Books, NY
    Feng, Gia-Fu Feng and English, Jane, (1972) Tao Te Ching. Vintage Books, NY

    Feng, Gia-Fu Feng and English, Jane, (1974) Chuang Tsu, Inner chapters. Vintage Books, NY
    Franck, Fredrick, (1973) The Zen of Seeing. Vintage Books, New York

    Gard, Richard A., (1962) Buddhism. George Braziller, NY
    Gehlek, Rimpoche Nawang, (2001) Good Life, Good Death, Tibetan Wisdom on Reincarnation. Penguin Publishing Inc., New York
    Gimian, Carolyn Rose, (1999) The Essential Chogyam Trungpa. Shambhala Press, Boston and London
    Goddard, Dwight, (1938) A Buddhist Bible. Beacon Press, Boston, MA
    Goleman, Daniel, (2003) Destructive Emotions, A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama. Bantam Books, New York
    Grigg, Roy, (1994) The Tao of Zen. Alva Press, Boston.

    Hanh, Thich Nhat, (1974) Zen Keys. Garden City, Anchor Books, New York
    Hanh, Thich Nhat, (1991) Old Path White Clouds, Walking in the Footsteps of the Buddha. Parallax Press, Berkeley, CA:
    Hanh, Thich Nhat, (1998) The Heart of the Buddha’s Teaching. Broadway Books, New York
    Hanh, Thich Nhat, (2002) No Death no Fear. Riverhead Books, NY
    Hanh, Thich Nhat, (2006) Understanding Our Mind. Parallax Press, Berkeley, CA
    Harrer, Heinrich, (1953) Seven Years in Tibet. Penguin Putnam Inc., New York
    Herrigel, Eugen, (1953) Zen in the Art of Archery. Vintage Books, New York
    Herrigel, Eugen, (1960) The Method of Zen. Vintage Books, New York
    Hesse, Hermann, (1957) Siddhartha. Bantam Books, NY
    Hoffmann, Yoel, (1975) The Sound of the One Hand, 281 Zen Koans with Answers. Basic Books, New York
    Huxley, Aldous, (1944) The Perennial Philosophy, Harper and Row, NY
    Huxley, Aldous, (1955) The Doors of Perception and Heaven and Hell, Harper Perennial, NY

    Ikeda, Daisaku, (2001) For the Sake of Peace, Seven Paths to Global Harmony, A Buddhist Perspective. Midway Press, Santa Monica, CA

    Jaxon-Bear, Eli, 2004) Sudden Awakening, New World Library, CA
    Johari, Harish, (1975) Leela, The Game of Self Knowledge, Coward, McCann, and Geoghegan, Inc., NY

    Kalupahana, David J., (1992) A History of Buddhist Philosophy, Continuities and Discontinuities. University of Honolulu Press, Honolulu
    Kapleau, Roshi Philip, (1979) Zen Dawn in the West. Anchor Press, Garden City, New York:
    Kapleau, Roshi Philip, (1997) Awakening to Zen. Garden City, Scribner, New York, NY
    Khan, Pir Vilayat Inayat, (1974) Toward the One, Harper, NY
    Komito, David Ross, (1987) Nagarjuna’s “Seventy Stanzas”. Snow Lion Publications, New York, NY:

    Lama Surya Das, (1992) The Snow Lion's Turquoise Mane, Wisdom Tales from Tibet. Harper Collins, New York, NY
    Legge, James, (1962) The Texts of Taoism, The T’ai Shang Tractate, the Writings of Chuang Tzu, Dover, NY
    Legge, James, (1964) I Ching, Book of Changes, Edited by Ch’u Chai, Bantam Books, NY
    Levy, John, (2004) The Nature of Man According to the Vedanta. Sentient Publications,

    Mair, Victor, (1990) Tao Te Ching. Bantam books, NY
    Maitreya, Ananda, (1995) The Dhammapada. Parallax Press, Berkeley CA
    Miller, Barbara Stoller, (1986) The Bagavad-Gita. Bantam Books, NY
    Mitchell, Stephen, (1998) Tao Te Ching. Harper and Row, NY

    Pirsig, Robert M. (1974) Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, An inquiry into Values. William Morrow, NY
    Pirsig, Robert M. (1991) Lila, An inquiry into Morals. Bantam books, NY
    Powers, John, (1995) Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism. Snow Lion Publicans, Ithica, NY

    Reps, Paul, (1930) Zen Flesh, Zen Bones; A Collection of Zen and Pre-Zen Writings. Anchor Books, Garden City, New York:
    Reynolds, Brad, (2004) Embracing Reality. Penguin
    Ricard, Matthieu and Trinh Xuan Thuan, (2001) The Quantum and the Lotus. Three Rivers Press, New York, NY:
    Roshi, Philip Kapleau, (1997) Awakening to Zen, The Teachings of Roshi Philip Kapleau. Scribner, New York:

    Smith, Huston, (1991) The World’s Religions, Harper Collins, NY
    Sogyal Rinpoche, (1991) The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, Harper, San Franciso
    Spiegelman, J. Marvin, Ph.D. and Miyuki, Mokusen, Ph.D., (1985) Buddhism and Jungian Psychology. Falcon Press, Phoenix, AZ
    Sùra, Arya, Once the Buddha Was a Monkey: Arya Sura's "Jatakamala". Translated by Peter Khoroche
    Suzuki, D. T., (1956) Zen Buddhism, Selected Writings of D.T. Suzuki. Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, NY
    Suzuki, D. T., (1960) Manual of Zen Buddhism. Random House, Inc., New York
    Suzuki, D. T., (1964) An Introduction to Zen Buddhism. Grove Press, New York
    Suzuki, D. T., (1969) The Field of Zen Buddhism, Selected Writings of D.T. Suzuki. Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, NY
    Suzuki, D. T., (1971) What is Zen? Harper & Row, New York
    Swami Prabhavananda and Isherwood, Christopher, (1944) The Song of God, Bhagavad-Gita, Mentor, NY

    Tzu, Lao, Tao The Ching. (1990) Edited by John C.H. Wu, Shambala Press, Boston and London
    Taitetsu Unno, (1998) River of Fire, River of Water.
    Thurman, Robert, (1995) Essential Tibetan Buddhism. Harper Books, San Francisco.
    Thurman, Robert, (1998) Inner Revolution. Riverhead Books, New York
    Torwesten, Hans, (1985) Vedanta, the Heart of Hinduism. Grove Press, NY
    Tsering, Diki, (2000) Dalai Lama, My Son. Penguin Publishing Inc., New York

    Waite, Dennis, (2003) The Book of One, The Spiritual Path of Advaita. John Hunt, Winchester, UK
    Waley, Arthur, Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China. (1939) Double Day, New York.
    Watts, Alan W., (1957) The Way of Zen. Vintage Books, New York
    Watts, Alan W., (1958) The Spirit of Zen; A Way of Life, Work, and Art in the Far East. Grove Press, New York:
    Watts, Alan W., (1961) Psychotherapy East & West. Ballantine Books, New York
    Watts, Alan W., (1966) The Book on the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are. Collier Books, New York, New York
    Watts, Alan W., (1974) Meditation, How to Do It. Pyramid Books, New York
    Watts, Alan W., (1974) The Essence of Alan Watts. Celestial Arts, Mill Brae, CA
    Watts, Alan W., (1978) Uncarved Block, Unbleached Silk. A & W Publishers, NY
    Watts, Alan W., (1979) Zen and the Beat Way. Charles E. Tuttle, Boston.
    Watts, Alan W., (1980) Om, Creative Meditations. Celestial Arts, Mill Brae, CA
    Watts, Alan W., (1982) Play to Live. South Bend, Indiana
    Watts, Alan W., (1994) Talking Zen. Weather Hill. New York, Tokyo
    Walters, Derek, (1983) The Hsuan Ching, The Aquarian Press, Wellingbourgh, Northhamptonshire
    White, John, (1974) What is Meditation? Vintage Books, Garden City, New York
    Wilhelm, Hellmut, (1973) Eight Lectures on the I Ching. Harper, NY
    Wilhelm, Richard (1931) The Secret of the Golden Flower. Harvest, NY
    Wilber, Ken, (1979) No Boundry. Shambala Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Wilber, Ken, (1980) The Atman Project. Quest Books, New York
    Wilber, Ken, (1981) Up From Eden. Quest Books, New York
    Wilber, Ken, (1996) A Brief History of Everything. Shambala Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Wilber, Ken, (1997) The Eye of the Spirit. Shambala Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Wilber, Ken, (2000) A Theory of Everything. Shambala Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Wilber, Ken, (2002) Boomeritis. Shambala Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Wilber, Ken, (2004) The Simple Feeling of Being: Embracing Your True Nature. Shambala Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Wilber, Ken, (2006) Integral Spirituality. Integral Books, Boston, Massachusetts.
     
  4. tikoo

    tikoo Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,978
    Likes Received:
    488
    People write and sell books. Very nice. I am not much a believer in life after death, nor life before birth.
    I believe in dreaming. Rest in peace, have a good timeless and eternal dream . Pray for your children, too.

    My first conciousness is the egg of me. I have no sense of gravity. I am afloat free within my
    mother.

    My ancestors deceased are in dream-life. Sometimes absurdly.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2023
  5. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    That's quite a bibliography. Needless to say I haven't read them all, but I have read some of them. I'll try to give you some of my perspectives, but I think it will probably be futile. You've developed a personal life philosophy based on your understanding of these books that is obviously how you view the world. It works for you, which is the important thing. I, of course, am approaching it from a different perspective: an interest in how Buddhism is understood and practiced in Asia, and how it relates to world religions. Take, for example, rebirth and samsara. You say: Reincarnation is the transmigration of the soul, or self, from one body to another.
    Rebirth is the forming of a new self that has been influenced by a different self in the past."

    My understanding of these concepts is similar to yours, based on everything I've read about Buddhism. However, as is true of most ancient belief systems, there are some areas of Buddhism that appear, to disinterested observers, to be problematic or "contradictions". I'm not sure it would be productive to go over these, since I think you've already made up your mind and there are not others except Shy who seem to be watching. I have the feeling that it will be an exercise equivalent to trying to convince Southern Baptists that sprinkling is okay for baptism, or Catholics that Mary probably wasn't a virgin. Your cherished notions are important to you, as to most people, and are effectively your reality. But we'll see how it goes.
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2023
  6. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Let's start with Samsara, a concept which is shared by Buddhists and Vedantists. In an earlier post, you said: "Samsara is the term used to describe how the experience of reality that we hold is actually a distortion of reality. It can be empirically demonstrated by a simple study of how our sensory apparatus works and how sensory data is processed by the brain, or mind if you wish." Which of your many sources did you get that from? It's completely at variance with everything I've read about Samsara--to the point of being unrecognizable as the same concept. What is missing is the vicious cycle--and the concept of rebirth, which you do address in your current post.

    Specifically, most sources define Samsara as having to do with the vicious cycle of birth, rebirth and death--including continuance from one being to another. It can be translated as (Devangari: संसार) or "wandering", (Juergensmeyer and Roof, Encyclopedia of Global Religion"; or as Lunhui/shengsi lunhui 輪迴): 'cycle of existence': "the continual repetitive cycle of birth and death that arises from ordinary beings' grasping and fixating on a self and experiences." Samsara denotes the "cyclicality of all life, matter, existence". Monier-Williams says saṃsāra is rooted in the term Saṃsṛ (संसृ), which means "to go round, revolve, pass through a succession of states, to go towards or obtain, moving in a circuit".A Sanskrit-English Dictionary It is commonly described as a "wheel". "Buddhists conceive of the world as a suffering-laden cycle of life, death, and rebirth, without beginning or end, known as samsara. Beings are driven from life to life in this system by karma, which is activated by their good or ill actions committed in this life as well as previous lives. Liberation from samsara is the raison d’être of Buddhism." Saṃsāra and Rebirth - Buddhism - Oxford Bibliographies

    Samsara is a concept that Buddhism borrowed from Vedantists. What Buddhism rejected, as you note, is a permanent soul that transmigrates from body to body after death, since Buddhists believe in anatman (no self). So far, so good. But this brings us to a paradox: if there is no soul and no transmigration, what is it that is reborn? (TBC)
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2023
  7. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,446
    Likes Received:
    14,572
    I included all of those books as an understanding of Buddhism, Taoism, Vedanta, etc. can't be accomplished unless you understand all of Buddhism, etc. Unless you want to get into sudden enlightenment, and even then you still need to understand the totality of what Buddhism, et al is saying and how it is expressed.
    I agree that the Eastern philosophies are full of contradictions, until you understand the nature of the contradictions.

    I really don't remember where I got specific aspects of my idea of samsara, that's why I included all those books, as I said.
    If you search the internet you get different ideas and explanations, most of them quite basic. You have to look beyond the common.

    Here's the into definition of Samara from Wikipedia:
    Now I stated that samsara, or the world as we see it, is an illusion.
    Let me explain.
    In the Lankavatara Scripture "all the objects of the world, and the names and forms of experience, are manifestations of the mind ~ Nguyen Dac Sy"
    Buddhism describes how we view the world and why what we think we see is an illusion, and it does this in many ways. One way is by describing how our sensory apparatus works. The most common example is the eye and I'll use a simple explanation.
    When viewing an object we see the light that is reflected from that object. But we don't see the object as it is in reality due to several factors including our limited ability to only experience a small range of the radiation bouncing off the object.
    But also as the light takes time to reach our eyes, register on our eye apparatus, and then be transmitted to the brain; the object has already changed. We never see any object in real time.
    Further, as our brain translated the incoming data into a thought, the data is understood based on past experiences, present emotions, hormonal levels, etc. We never get a pure stream of unadulterated data.
    The object we see, is a construct, or an imitation of the real object. We never experience it directly.
    The object we see is an illusion, not the real thing. As a result we think what we experience is real and hasn't already changed and we become "ordinary beings' grasping and fixating on a self and experiences."

    That is samsara.

    Here's an explanation that's not bad: Samsara, Karma & How To Escape
     
  8. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,446
    Likes Received:
    14,572
    What is reborn is the illusion of a self. Every creature that is born thinks of itself as a separate being. That is what is reborn, not a physical being (although a body is present), but a concept of a self.
    Buddhism rejects the notion that we are separate beings as the self is an illusion, without the self there can't be separate beings.
    We all share the illusion of being separate because we are all the same.
     
  9. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    And as all forms of energy interact with each other, each “individual” energy field, known as an individual being or self, always interacts with the total field.
    Upon death this interaction does not end, but continues in an altered form, without the individual self.
    As it continues it interacts with the greater field and when the first of the Five Aggregates in the form of a body, or matter, again arises, a new self also arises as the Five Aggregates are again interacting.
    As the new self has been influenced by the total energy field, and in particular the altered energy field of a previous conglomerate of the five Aggregates, it is imprinted with that energy pattern.
    There is no continuous self that has reincarnated, but a new self is reborn influenced by a previous energy pattern.
    Interesting.
    "Both Samsara and karma only exist as describable phenomena because it’s the only way for the false-belief-system of absolutism (things existing within nothingness) to describe the true nature of reality. If you start with a false-belief then all true things will look like odd phenomena from your perspective. If you adjust your belief system to be in tune with the true nature of reality then the beliefs of Samsara and karma fall apart." So for the real cognoscenti the whole thing is false? An illusion that "falls apart" when you're in tune with true reality? That seems to be what the dude is saying. Yet it also seems that the Buddha taught samsara, karma, and rebirth. This reminds me of what some theologians have done with Genesis. God had to dumb it down for people who weren't ready for the truth. Yet millions of Buddhists have been operating on the assumption that they need to store up good karma and avoid bad karma to assure a favorable rebirth and eventually maybe attain nirvana. But the noble lie makes them better people. I wonder what the Buddha really thought.

    I personally agree with Alasdair Forsythe. He looks rather caucasian and with a name like that sounds like a Brit. That's okay, but I wonder how he got his Buddhism and how authentic it is. He seems to write mainly books on alchemy and mysticism for a western audience that's hungry for the wisdom of the east, especially if it can be interpreted in away a western secular audience can accept. Is that where you're coming from? Re-interpreting the concepts so that they "fall apart' or are illusions or metaphors?
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2023
  10. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    So that's one way of dealing with samsara, karma and rebirth. But if we take them seriously instead of trying to explain them away, there are other possibilities:
    • Energy field and energy transferrence. Theravada scholar Walpola Rahula, in What the Buddha Taught (1959). "When
    this physical body is no more capable of functioning, energies do not die with it, but continue to take some other shape or form, which we call another life."
    Likewise, you tell us:"as all forms of energy interact with each other, each “individual” energy field, known as an individual being or self, always interacts with the total field.
    Upon death this interaction does not end, but continues in an altered form, without the individual self.
    As it continues it interacts with the greater field and when the first of the Five Aggregates in the form of a body, or matter, again arises, a new self also arises as the Five Aggregates are again interacting.
    As the new self has been influenced by the total energy field, and in particular the altered energy field of a previous conglomerate of the five Aggregates, it is imprinted with that energy pattern.
    There is no continuous self that has reincarnated, but a new self is reborn influenced by a previous energy pattern."
    Energy and energy fields are "in" concepts with science fans. However, nothing in science supports energy that retains an attraction to individuals such that when an individual dies that particular energy field goes on to animate another being, carrying along its good or bad karma. That is mysticism or metaphysics dressed up in a lab coat.
    • Molecules. Zen teacher John Daido Loori takes it to the molecular level: "There is no question that when this physical body is no longer capable of functioning, the energies within it, the atoms and molecules it is made up of, don’t die with it. They take on another form, another shape. You can call that another life, but as there is no permanent, unchanging substance, nothing passes from one moment to the next." Yes, I suppose you could call it another life. But what form do those molecules take. I thought most Buddhists were into cremation. If so, how do those molecules form another life? By fertilizing the grass? When I die, I'll probably become worm food, but should I care that my molecules will be forever caught up in the cycle of breeding worms that will be eaten by birds that will be eaten by cats, that will be chased by dogs that live in the House that Jack Built?
    • Bad karma. Then there is the notion that our bad karma is somehow embodied in new life forms. I thought you mentioned that, but I can't find it. Anyhow, Tibetan teacher Chogyam Trunpa Rinpoche: what gets reborn is our neurosis--our habits of suffering and dissatisfaction." Convenient, but how does that work? --without metaphysics, that is.
    • Non-A, non-B. Walpola Rahula Thero, the first Buddhist monk to become a professor at a western university (Northwestern), tells us : "The person who dies here and is reborn elsewhere is neither the same person, nor another." Okay, then what is he? His statement might strike some as profound, others as vacuous.
    All this, while reflecting my skepticism, isn't intended to refute the notion of rebirth--only to show that it is fundamentally metaphysical. Nothing wrong with that. I think a certain amount of metaphysics is necessary for meaning in life. But I also think it supports my contention that Buddhism contains metaphysical elements that warrant characterizing it as a religion.



     
  11. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,446
    Likes Received:
    14,572
    What he is saying is that space does not exist on its own and objects do not exist on their own. In philosophical absolutism, space is an independently existing thing.

    This doesn't mean that objects and space don't exist, they do, but they are dependent on each other. You can't have an object without space around it, and you can't have space without an object within it.
    When trapped in the veil of samsara we believe that objects exist by themselves, as independent things. Let me be clear, objects do exist, I can kick a rock, but the rock only exists in relation to everything else. The definiton of a rock depends on the definition of the rest of the world. A rock is only hard in relation to the structure of my foot when I kick it. To a diamond it is soft.

    If you wonder what the Buddha thought, if he really existed, read translations of some of the Sutras such as the Diamond, and Lankavatara.

    I don't think I'm reinterpreting anything, just trying to understand the basic concepts.
     
  12. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,446
    Likes Received:
    14,572
    I'm a little confused as to which parts of your post are quotes and which are your thoughts. But anyway, Molecules. Molecules form by chemical bonds.
    Bad karma. Yes how does it work?
    Non A non B. Yes confusing.
     
  13. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Ah, I notice I omitted a quotation mark before the quote by Chogyam Trunpa Rinpoche. The quotation begins after the colon. I did include the one at the end of the quotation. Sorry about that.

    The "non-A, non-B comment was just my characterization of Walpola Rahula Thero's "deepity" (a term coined by atheist "horseman" Daniel Dennett to denote "a statement that is apparently profound but actually asserts a triviality on one level and something meaningless on another."Deepity
    "The person who dies here and is reborn elsewhere is neither the same person, nor another." How profound! What exactly does it mean, and why should anyone care? The non-A, non-B label is mine, for an (entity?) whose status is unknown. The inference is that it somehow shows that rebirth is a reality, but it amounts to double talk.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2023
  14. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    I wasn't accusing you of reinterpreting anything. Just wondering if Forsythe was. If we know, after enlightenment that samsara and karma are illusions, what is their usefulness beforehand? It doesn't really matter to me what the Buddha, if he existed, might have thought, but it matters somewhat what communities of practicing Asian Buddhists, past and present --as opposed to western intellectuals--think. Because it is the former that I have in mind when characterizing Buddhism as a religion. I have no problem with secularized Buddhism, unless it claims to be the "authentic" kind, to the exclusion of the Asian variety. Buddhism in western atheist circles is certainly more philosophy than religion, but that doesn't seem to be true in Asia.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2023
  15. tikoo

    tikoo Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,978
    Likes Received:
    488
    In the Americas ancestors become birds. They speak. And aren't there more birds than people; we and more than we.

    I've heard birds speak.
    Crows.
    And ravens also.

    In Norway they have a the Kroketing, which is kro+ting. This is their govt legislature. Their human congress sounds like when crows gather in the eve
    all talking in a one tree. The crows can make conversation with quiet and personal human-like voices. Then in that tree that one tree they rest together.
     
  16. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Thank you for that. It clears it all up.
     
  17. tikoo

    tikoo Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,978
    Likes Received:
    488
    What?

    Oh, the illuminations.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2023
  18. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
  19. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    So unless I read all of the books you have, I can't possibly understand Buddhism? Maybe so. Looking through your bibliography, some familiar names jump out, but I don't see much, if any, from the Mahayana and Pure Land schools. Looks like Zen and Tibetan Buddhism are well-represented--many of the representatives being from what Prebish calls "import Buddhism" or "elite Buddhism" (Charles Prebish, Buddhism:the American Experience, 2003, Journal of Buddhist Ethics Online Books), recruited by western intellectuals who were dissatisfied with the materialism, workaholism, and once-a-week canned spirituality of their own culture. These would include: in the Japanese Zen tradition, P.T. Suzuki and his disciple Alan Watts; in the Tibetan tradition, the Dali Lama and his follower, Robert Thurman; and the Vietnamese Tich Nhất Hạnh, of Theravada Buddhism, with an added layer of Zen. All of these are insightful thinkers and articulate presenters of their versions of Buddhism. All, however, tend to present a scaled-down version attractive to western secular audiences and detached from communal ritual observance.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2023
  20. Tishomingo

    Tishomingo Members

    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Imported Zen: Susuki and Watts. Zen became the rage among Beat Generation writers of the '40s and "50s. P.T Suzuki was one of the major popularizers of Zen in the West.
    D.T Suzuki
    "For decades, Suzuki presented Zen to Western audiences who were unfamiliar with this Buddhist school and thus were not suitably knowledgeable to critically assess what he conveyed to them. Only recently have Western audiences been able to determine that the vision of Zen Buddhism that Suzuki proffered was a particular interpretation that was not only far from traditional Chinese Chan and classical Japanese Zen, but was also quite distinct from other expressions of Zen within the sweeping reforms and modernization of Zen that took place during the Meiji period (1868–1912)."
    Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki: “Suzuki Zen” - Buddhistdoor Global


    Suzuki was presenting a scaled-down version of Zen, that took Zen out of its social, ritual, and ethical contexts and reframed it in terms of a language of metaphysics derived from German Romantic idealism, English romanticism, and American transcendentalism. David McMahan, (2008) The Making of Buddhist Modernism, Oxford: Oxford University Press Suzuki said he was showing "the 'essence' of Zen, a 'pristine' or 'pure Zen,' from which he had discarded voluble and trivial features, such as its institutional, popular, hierarchical, ritualistic, and magical aspects. In a book published in 1991, Bernard Faure showed that far from being superficial or banal, these popular ceremonial and hierarchical these features of Zen Buddhism—and even its magical or devotional aspects such as the worship of relics, deities, the mummification of teachers, the interpretation of dreams, and ritualism—form part of Chan and Zen as they have traditionally been practiced in China and Japan. Suzuki thus introduced a bare-bones Zen, abstracted from its historical-social context, evading its traditional reality..." His version,which has come to be called "Suzuki Zen", is now regarded as his personal take. . Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki: “Suzuki Zen” - Buddhistdoor Global

    Alan Watts. Watts’ first book, The Spirit of Zen "was largely a summarizing of Suzuki’s work." Watts was drawn to Buddhism by an early dislike of the austere Christian fundamentalism and rigid British culture he was raised in. He became the principal popularizer of Zen in the fifties and sixties. Later he added Advaita Vedanta to the mix, combining it with Zen in a manner that some view as oxymoronic. Buddhism holds to the doctrine of anatman: there is no soul. Adavaita, or Non-Dualism, believes in Atman, and holds that everything is part of a universal soul. The two might seem are mutually contradictory concepts. But as you explained,if there is only one reality, individual souls are illusory.

    The major problem I have with Watts seriously is his turn to drugs and alcoholism near the end of his life. If he was on the path to enlightenment, that seems like a strange and tragic ending. Of course, as my father used to say: Do as I say, not as I do. There may be some truth to that, but I wasn't overly impressed.
    TBC



     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2023

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice