RED ALERT!!! MASSIVE Obama Cover Up

Thanks... I did do my own research, which was led me to believe that you are just part of the ever shrinking group of people who can't think of anything better to do then attack obama on his birth issues...

It's really quite silly considering he has done enough other things (for real!) that you could use to attack him on that wouldn't get you disrespected.

Most here wont object to you attacking obama on things like guantanamo bay or on bradley manning or many other subjects in which he has proven to be a complete and utter failure on...

Hell, most wont even object too badly to you spewing your birth crap, UNTIL you start insulting them for not believing it.

At that point, you lose all right to whine or bitch about people handing your disrespect back to you.

 

Provide some real proof (extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence) and we'll all be very happy to believe you. But interview with a single fellow (who doesn't really seem all that important nor am I convinced why he'd know about this particular 'cover up') and some links to a random .com site really isn't very convincing.

 

repeating national vanguard talking points is not going to earn you much respect in here . . .

 

What will Obamas' next step be? Will he seek out ALL DICTIONARIES across these United States so they can all be taken outside and set on fire???

That might be quite a bit tougher to do. Especially with that segment of America who consider themselves as part of the Gun Culture of the USA.

 

Too little too late for Obamy to put out his bc and pretty chickenshit to pull that other shit with the online definitions.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it for that Anti Harper guy.:afro: Cronic Tom

 

You've chosen to make this into some kind of challenge against me?

You don't have the intelligence to do so troll.

 

i think the point you are failing to make, redhawk, is why this "cover up" actually means anything. are you under the assumption that because a word is removed from online dictionaries, that it will also be erased from the minds of citizens?

 

Not at all Cronic. I had a moment of levity and seized upon it.
Oh, and I am not a troll.

More MSG in your coffee sir??

 

z

 

When it acts like a troll, it gets called a troll... simple isn't it.

 

My 1st inclination would be to say something like here CT smoke this bowl.
My next inclination might be take a hit off this doob.

If after some smoke you're not a fair bit mo mellow....I can't help you.

Peace
7point

 

Me thinks there's a few here what's wrapped tooo tight.

 

me thinks you're really not entertaining at all. next!

 

Naked ?

 

Yes Please......:drool5:



Cheers Glen.

 

Who cares, he is a natural born killer and thus perfect for the job of American president.

 

Communication in general is becoming more difficult as we allow our vocabulary to be changed by redefinition of words rather than the creation of new words. The word marriage, for example, in the 1828 Websters dictionary as opposed to a newer Websters dictionary.

1828 Websters:

MAR'RIAGE, n. [L.mas, maris.] The act of uniting a man and woman for life; wedlock; the legal union of a man and woman for life. Marriage is a contract both civil and religious, by which the parties engage to live together in mutual affection and fidelity, till death shall separate them. Marriage was instituted by God himself for the purpose of preventing the promiscuous intercourse of the sexes, for promoting domestic felicity,and for securing the maintenance and education of children.

Recent Websters:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1 a(1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>

Of what value are our laws if we redefine the words used to write them? Not to mention the complications that arise when translating from one language to another.

 

You do realize that languages have always been an ever evolving thing, with words being redeifined, dropped and added as they progress through time?

Perhaps Obama has a time machine and has been purposely manipulating the language for the past 200 years to get to where he could be president?

Maybe, in the original time line, slavery was never ended and he broke into his masters laboratory and stole a time machine!!!

 

Honestly, I'd be happy if my leader was born in another country as it would mean nationalism is starting to lose its grip. The fact that some would not accept that shows more about them than it does about the president, wherever he was born.

 

I'd be happy if our leader had been born... the politibots are scary as fuck... lol