Thats what I was thinking too, but the crystals on the OP's nug are more prevalent and the nug doesnt seem as dense as your typical beasters. I know around here when I get beasters the nugs are dense enough to fuck someone with lol. Heres a shot of some beasters I have for reference.
as soon as i seen the first pic i could tell that it looked like some good stuff but it is hard to tell without smelling and then smoking as far as color and crystal content i would classify it as dank LOL. i would just like to add that i think these forums are really unreliable for the accuracy of peoples claims. anyone on here could type "I smoke the dankest shit anyone on earth has ever smoked EVER" how would we know thats true?? how would we know thats false?? theres no telling unless we actually see the weed or smoke it. i think that its fairly easy to tell by peoples posts if they lie and exaggerate their claims. this goes for far more thing then just weed but i thought it would be a good example LOL. i really dont see the point to lieing about something on forums. it would be really easy to lie about any aspect of anything its all words. anyone can type anything and we would believe that they are telling the truth. i dont know if this makes sence but i just thought i would post what i think about what some people post on here.
meh i didnt revive it nor did i look at the date of the original post lol. i just thought of a good post to add after reading through it.
i think those are better than your average beasters, but not quite headie dankness, around my area theyd go for 50-60 an 8th , 60 to highschoolers def
Looks really nice. To be honest, I usually get stuff that looks pretty similar to that, just cause I got humboldt hookup so it's dank as hell. I can't see much of a size indicator here, though. You said you paid $20 for that? Must be som pretty dense nugs