question about energy

You will notice that science records the trail the questing mind.

 

It's kind of you to take the time to tell me that, fmk. If only I were able to maintain that kind of objectivity in more emotionally trying circumstances...as my spirit guide Deanna can attest based on her years of experience associating with me. But it's some accomplishment anyway.

 

They have already called it gravity, but I guess the that it would be true of it as well.

Consistent with a model of intent.

 

Like a rat trying to find the cheese at the end of the maze.

 

?

??

Seems like there might be something deep and intriguing here, but I can't find any handle to grab it with.

 

Mrwriter has a pulse.

 

I mean hypothesis are conceived before they are tested.

 

Oh, well that explains EVERYTHING. LOL

You seem to be equating awareness with gravity...and greater mass with intent. Awareness would require intent to create matter...and greater focus of intent for higher masses of matter...focus of intent slows time? More time required for greater focus of intent? LOL I dunno dope, I'm just grasping at straws here. It's certainly alleviating the overall gravity of the discussion, anyway.

 

Thus the many dead ends in the maze.

 

Science has already given a description for awareness, it is called gravity, that intent around which bodies accumulate. Science is a firm about gravity as it is about awareness.

Gravity is the most ephemeral cadence, yet choreographs the whole celestial ballet.

Simply consider how much further along a project proceeds with concerted effort. You haven't changed the workspace but you become quicker, more effecient.

 

Well that's a good point. I would have thought that gravity and awareness were analogous rather than identical, but I just got some coffee and I'm mulling this over...

True, and a very interesting point.

I may need to sip more coffee to get a handle on that one...

The thing is, from the viewpoint of somebody out in space, the events on a massive planet proceed more slowly than events in space. So I'm not sure how the efficiency analogy works.

While I was thinking about this I remembered reading that from an outside viewer, a spaceship falling into a black hole would, for all practical purposes, never reach the center because of the intense slowing of time created by the enormous mass of the black hole. The spaceship passengers would seem immortal, from that viewpoint. I don't know if this has any bearing on the discussion at hand; if so maybe the connection will come to me.

 

The two a married in the terms of intent and conception.

Time is relevant to us in the manner it allows us to proceed to our destination.