Hey guys, I was horsing around at reddit getting kicked off bulletin boards by militant atheists and academics in the name of objectivity and freedom of speech, when I started to figure out how to solve for the Quantum Observer Effect and I thought I'd put my idea out there and see what people think. For awhile its been bugging me how to prove 42 really is as good an explanation as any other, and the pie-in-the-face research I've collected suggested it should be possible, but how to do it? Then I realized that the commonality in all the pies-in-the-face was that the jokes always went right over the heads of the researchers themselves, suggesting that the harder they searched for reality, the more nonsensical their behavior became to an outside observer. These are not stupid people, and have to ask yourself how they can possibly miss these jokes, with the simple explanation being they are determining their own reality, while reality and fiction are becoming less distinguishable to an outside observer. This could possibly explain the Simultaneity Paradox of Relativity as reflecting the fact that for the theory to remain useful at such extremes as the speed of light and a black hole, it must contain a glaring contradiction. The problem can also be thought of as expressing local and nonlocal effects in terms of the observer themselves. Local reality is required for us to impose error corrections and make more sense out of what, ultimately, makes no sense, but the observer's nonlocal reality as part of consensual reality is what ultimately determines what we perceive.