Psychedelic Bump II

All the ones that someone said they are worth trying, yes. I appraise who says what about it and make a decision. There is no substance which is worth trying which I would not try . . .

 

bump for last night/thismorning!


~30mg 2c-b ingested [29mg in a gelcap, plus a few mg i spilled on the counter], and 115mg of molly [15mg snorted just before eating the 2c-b, and 100mg more eaten about 6 hours after eating the 2c-b]. astounding visuals.

astounding trip, and a great place to start a some kind of psychedelic hiatus

 

do you decide the what is worth trying based mainly on the psychoactive effects it produce or other things like comedown, withdrawal, length, classification of drug, etc taken into consideration.?

Like heroin for example is totally worth trying to me based on the psychoactive effects i've heard it produces and there was a time where I was seeking it out but kind of gave up on that when I couldn't find it. Kind of seeing the physical repercussions of some other drugs has made me hesitant and if i'm not mistaken it's actually somewhat expensive which I was surprised about.

Crystal Meth I was on the fence about too and I actually gave into that one and the psychoactive effects are all they are made out to be and more but it's pretty draining on the body.

 

for me it's

history+effects+possible benefits+"fun" factor
minus
knowledge of health effects+possible negative results+overall addiction risk
equals
whether I will try something or not.

I can only say this, knowledge is king, learn about what you are going to ingest. Know what your doing.
Some people will piss and moan about preservatives in soda pop, yet stuff some RC that has only been around a year up their nose to get high
sounds kinda inconsistant, don't it?

 

bump for the last hjowever long

helllooo guys nice to see you, see you

 

ill just put this here..

 

it has all the +'s and none of the -'s

 

Hey , how ya doin.

 

Turning 18 tomorrow and will be tripping, either on 2C-E, 4-AcO-DMT, or both. Thought I'd bump now though since I'm planning a fairly high dose of either/both and probably won't get around to posting until after the experience.

 

Guerilla yeah i do a global assessment of the molecule, weighing all its aspects in my mind.

gutentag liebe, war ist du?

 

Happy birthday! arty:

 

i'd be curious to see what makes the list. or what doesn't if that's easier.

i'm sure my to do list is different than yours. what's "worth it" to you, may not be for me.

for example, i will not try methylone, mephedrone, or butylone. hell, i probably won't even do MDMA in my lifetime, though i'm not completely opposed to that one. i'm pretty sure i'll never repeat cocaine, ketamine or salvia. or do meth, heroin or crack.

the only new drugs i think i'll try are 2cp, DMT, maybe 4homipt and MAYBE DPT

 

MDMA actualy isn't that bad. I have a loathing for the concept of forced euphoria... but MDMA to me feels more like it opens you up to the possibility of emotionial depth, while methylone feels forced and dirty to me. Synthetic and meaningless. I'm not the biggest fan of MDMA either... but I think it's worth a shot if you're going to use it properly. It's a good pathway to open your brain up to if you're not just trying to "roll your tits off and get hiiiiiiiiigh, son!" End quote.

 

oh no its great to "roll your tits off and get high son"

My advice for those interested in MDMA "Reach for the lasers, safe as fuck"

 

I'm gonna go for 25mg aMT (freebase).

Bump for a nice chill sunday...

 

pork you've never done mdma! its in a league of its own, and definitely up there in the hallows with LSD, Mushrooms, DMT imo. A purely affective psychedelic. I still don't get why you're grouping ketamine with meth and heroin but ok, you literally don't know what you're talking about

i am not interested in the BK-MXXX series either really, they are all pale shadows of Molly, except Methylone which actually comes quite close ime. What are your reasons for not being interested, is it that they don't appear to offer anything deep? I think if you think MDMA doesn't offer anything deep then you have just been inundated with "teh rollers", which is exactly what I'm trying to point out with your opinion of ketamine. These are two which are very very easy to abuse and not get any use from, easier to abuse than say LSD, which kinda knocks you over the head with life changes sometimes. I think if you read Shulgin's comments on MDMA you can't honestly say it doesn't sound wildly interesting, not even mentioning, again like ketamine, its use and potential in medicine.

You're really not interested in sampling something which can cure PTSD in one dose? What planet are you from?

 

i wasn't grouping ketamine with meth and heroin, other than they are all drugs i don't plan on doing.

you knew i've never tried MDMA. i do admit it seems interesting (i know that Shulgin loves it) but just not THAT interesting to me. i'm sure it offers something deep - the main reason i won't be trying this one is that i don't trust the substance to be what its advertised to be. it is more harmful than the classic psychedelics (serotonin syndrome and the like). it's just never sounded that appealing to me. again, the main reason i haven't tried molly is because i don't trust it to be actual pure MDMA. also, i don't have PTSD

notice i didn't completely rule out the use of MDMA. i said "i probably won't"

 

but as a scientific mind you know what PTSD is, and you know that for something to "cure" it is quite spectacular. I also don't have death-related anxiety due to my stage 4 brain cancer, yet mushrooms intrigue the human and inquirer in me for their ability to remove said anxiety in people who are dying. I'm appealing to the scientist in you

 

I have no real interest in trying MDMA for a second time either, other than in combination with some powerful psychedelics; especially the physically dysphoric/neutral psychedelics.

 

MDMA didn't help me with my ptsd at all.

I don't think I used it right though...