You of course are right, I'm sorry that I directed the comment to you. It's just after hearing all these other people who say they believe in God and Jesus and that God inspired men to write the Bible, then they say the Bible isn't trustworthy because men wrote it! I mean what in the world, do they really think that God inspired men to write it and then didn't care what was written down or do they just believe that God doesn't have the ability to assure its accuracy. Well that was on my mind and I put it in my answer to you and I shouldn't have. PS As for; I believe God exist, but that does not make me necessarily right. I wasn't really saying that what you believe is correct, although I believe you are. I try to speak to what a person believes whether I share their beliefs or not.
I guess if you throw out all historical documents as false, then you must be right, the complete Bible was written at the Council of Nicaea in the year 325 C.E. but I think quite a few historians might disagree with you!
That's an interesting thought, but when people say that I look at it a different way. Let's say that they were inspired by God, yet they got the message wrong. I think this is clearly possible, if they were inspired by God in an indirect way. If I were to observe a weeping willow and attribute it a testiment to God's glory, and then go on to write about the nature of said God based on my observation, you could see where i might get a few things wrong. Maybe they just felt the divine Love that IS God, and that is all they were inspired by?
the voice that xtians think is god is really that little bit of schizo that we all have they just give it a name
Actually the canon was accepted as such, shortly after the last book was written in the first century. The Counsel of Nicaea just put their stamp of approval on what was already accepted as canon.