President Trump's First Hundred Days

The gist of the neocon/liberal agenda is to obliterate America's sovereignty preparatory to assimilating us into global government; AKA: New World Order.

Conservatives, not to be confused with Republicans, want to preserve the patrimony of our Founding Fathers.

 

One of President Trump's most bitchen statements was concerning other countries paying for our military if they want to use it. Implicit within that statement is recognition of what most Americans know: neocons and liberals have turned our military into a version of Louis Lepke and Meyer Lansky's, Murder, Inc.

Our soldiers are long past done fighting and dying in wars that have nothing to do with America's security.

 

I hope he does.

JFK was well on his way to destroying the Fed Reserve. Some believe that his Silver Certificates, which threatened the Fed Reserve, were causal of his murder.

[SIZE=12pt]“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property -until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”[/SIZE]
[SIZE=12pt]---Thomas Jefferson---[/SIZE]

[SIZE=12pt]"There is hardly a part of the United States where men are not aware that secret private purposes and interests have been running the government."[/SIZE]
[SIZE=12pt]---President Woodrow Wilson---[/SIZE]

[SIZE=12pt]“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”[/SIZE]
[SIZE=12pt]---President Woodrow Wilson---[/SIZE]

[SIZE=12pt]President Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act in to law.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=12pt]More quotes on the treasonous Federal Reserve: http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/[/SIZE]

 

Vlad would like the Baltics. Wonder if Mr.T. will look the other way?

 

You have it reversed.

Do you have dyslexia?

 

This would be a great opportunity for Vlad to retake the Baltics and restore the Russo/Soviet empire. I think Trump would probably look the other way, since Vlad is his hero and benefactor and might have some blackmail material that could come out.

 

Why would your assumption amount to any of our business?

Would you be willing to start thermonuclear war over an action that does not threaten the security of the United States?

There is not a damned thing in any of our founding documents about a USA responsibility to democratize the world. Our Founding Fathers were non-interventionists. Interventionism and democratizing the world are recent constructs of neocons. They have absolutely no factual basis vis-à-vis tenets of our Founding Fathers.

 

MeAgain,

I can't argue with France and GB screwing up the Treaty of Versailles, which was a direct cause of WWII, and GB & the USA screwing up the Paris Peace Treaties that ended WWII. GB and the USA gave Stalin countries when they should have served him with a death warrant. Chamberlain was a huge cause of WWII. He should've never appeased Hitler. Neither France nor GB did a damned thing to prosecute their war declarations of 03 Sept 39, two days after Hitler invaded Poland. But what was worse was GB & the USA appeasing a punk, thug criminal, Stalin. He was worse than Hitler. Under Truman, a Democrat darling, just about half of the world fell to Stalin. And he was our ally. Truman should've allowed MacArthur to kill Stalin.

The Allies biggest advantage in WWII was Hitler. He was too stupid to prosecute war. Operation Barbarossa cost Hitler the war because he couldn't whip Mother Nature, something Napoleon learned better than a century earlier. And we can't forget that Stalin and Hitler were allies, yet we allowed that murderous, punk, ex-con Stalin to become one of our Allies.

Anyway, countries have to provide for their own defenses. If they screw up (Kuwait) and spend their money elsewhere, they cannot rely on Murder, Inc., the US military, to bail them out.

The ruskies used to be decades behind the west in terms of military technology. I'd imagine that they're still behind the west, but how far is not known to me.

NATO is not only old school, it is dangerous school. Turkey, a NATO nation, in an act of gross stupidity, shot down a Russian plane. If Putin were the war monger as liberals and neocons portray him, he could've declared war on Turkey. That would have started WWIII since Turkey, as a provision of NATO, would've called the USA & GB to defend it. Were we really willing to go to thermonuclear war because of an old school treaty that would've demanded that we defend Turkey from its stupidity?

The USA needs no other nation on Earth to aid in its defense. Other countries, with the exception of GB, need us. Are we and GB willing to sacrifice our servicemen defending countries that mean nothing militarily to either country?

Both the USA & GB ought to decide who either will defend. The UN or any treaty ought not commit either country to war that they wish to avoid. In fact, the USA does not need the UN. The UN needs us. Worse, the UN is a direct threat to America's sovereignty. Our Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew that we're in the UN, and that the UN is on soil that they've made free for their progeny.

Germany is probably the richest country on Earth. It's probably the most scientific country on Earth. It has the most advanced submarines on Earth. It ought to build its military to include nukes as a deterrent to a very remote possibility of Russian aggression. I wouldn't be surprised if Germany has nukes. However, the reality is that they're far more compatible as allies. Russia is loaded with natural resources. Germany is loaded with incredibly gifted scientists. Together, they could rule the economic world. As enemies, they could destroy themselves. My money's on their going with the former.

There was a very good reason that our Founding Fathers were non-interventionists.

If the USA has the Monroe Doctrine, why would American politicians think that Putin has no claim to the defense of Russia?

I agree with Trump 100%: it's far more wise to get along with Putin than any other association as long as Putin does not threaten USA security.

Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.
---Thomas Jefferson---

 

Who knows what the future holds in store. Have you forgotten about Kim Jong Un or ISIS? Nice to know there's such a stable, well-informed guy at our helm.

 

I don't pay any attention to them either.
No ones gonna drop the bomb though.

 

In the end "It is the Actions which define us in Character, Morality and indeed Legacy"

 

Thank God we're soon to have a president who espouses tenets of our Founding Father.

I'm proud to sound like Trump.

If I sound like Trump, you sound so much like Stalin. Keep in mind, Me, that the most murderous dictators in the history of Earth sounded just like you.

 

Do liberals & neocons realize that globalism, one-world-government, New World Order, or what the hell ever you wanna call it implies the end of the the United States of America? Do neocons & liberals really want to surrender the sovereignty of the country created by an assembly of the greatest political minds that have ever existed to delegates to Third World countries?

We were intended to be a republic, not a damned empire. We were never intended to be the world's policeman. Were we to accept that role, we'd have to accept that other countries could police us.

Nonintervention, not isolation.

 

No, we don't.

 

No, they don't...and no to what you said about MeAgain....You are starting to sound dictatorship, yourself, and I have been looking for where you said something about feeling people, and cannot find that post....right now, but i wanted to say.....You cannot replace feeling beings with robots...i realize there is a place for the unfeeling and pragmatic also, but I am happy for the feeling people. Some have accomplished great things.

 

I consider myself liberal in that I'm for welcoming immigrants into the country, I'm for abortion and stricter gun laws, universal health care etc. and I realize that globalism is the death knell of America and that we shouldn't be spreading our empire across the world. It pretty much disgusts me that other so-called liberals think that that's okay.

So in answer to your question, people who classify themselves as being liberal are as diverse as people who classify themselves as being conservative. You wouldn't want me lumping all conservatives under the guise of neo-cons, would you? I think you've been off base in your attitude towards liberals in general. I suspect that you lack emotions to some degree and look down upon those who possess them in general, strong emotions being stereotypical of liberals. I can see why you'd be anti-liberal, but you're going to have to accept that most people in general do and always will feel strong emotions -- emotions that lead them to want to help and take care of each other to the best of their ability. It's just in human nature for us to look out for each other.

People don't understand how antithetical globalism is to this cause, however. Our different nationalities are a very positive thing that teaches us tolerance and understanding. The United States must humble itself or I fear it will be destroyed.