President Obama supporting islamic terrorists

I don't have a problem with Muslim as a religion.


I do have a problem with Obama sympathizers who totally deny Obama's wrongdoing.

He DID support Al Qaeda in Libya, they hung the Al Qaeda flag. Syria is a whole nother big lie. I think his supporters are the ones who put down other's views to justify their own.

It's constantly the republicans or Bushes fault.

It provides me with entertainment to know that people who hated Bush, love his policies when a Democrat is doing it. It makes you guys look inhibited. Like, you don't have any real political views, you just follow everything Obama says.

Obama supports total unfettered government control, with no type of Constitutional oversight. The Libya regime change, and many of his laws, go against the Constitution and this nations principles.

His supporters want the best of both worlds- they support government crime, but blame everything on Republicans.

Coming from someone who is neither Dem or Con, Democrats look worse than Republicans. At least Republicans can admit to Bushes wrong doing. These Neo Democrats support everything Obama does, yet blame all bad on the Republicans.

He hasn't done anything GOOD for this country. He starts wars, kill citizens, lies and, doesn't follow the Constitution. People who support him look like fools. You think you're so different from Republicans, when Obama has done nothing but perpetuated the Bush Doctrine. More wars, more spying, more demonizing the people and, less freedom.

But you like lying to yourselves and saying "I don't support that, that was a "Bush thing."

 

What are you using to back that up (not a pic)?

 

It's been all over the news. Even Gaddafi (who shook hands with Obama not 6 months earlier) said it was Al Qaeda. Don't tell me you believe all those middle eastern people can write "Liberate Libya," and other protest signs in perfect English.

Gaddafi was trying to invent the Gold Denot,which would contest the dollar. We killed him, and not a week later they were hanging Al Qaeda flags.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rthplace-Libyas-revolution-flag-Al-Qaeda.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-flags-parade-gadhafi-hometown/story?id=16004407

Does it matter what source I use? I know you- you don't trust 1/5th of the websites I post. Not because they are known to lie (like CNN or FOX,) but because they are little known, or "Russian government" stations.

CNN was caught lying about Syria. Look up "Syria Danny," and how he was making Syria APPEAR like there was genocide going on.

Meanwhile, alot of rebels in Syria are Al Qaeda as well!

To me, the "official story" of a lot of events are more of a conspiracy theory than looking at the governments history, and making an educated guess.

Repeatedly, they lie to us, to get us into wars; Why would this time be different?

I think people trust Obama too much, and don't look into his corruption and lies. If he could kill a teenager for his DAD committing "speech crimes;" He doesn't give a fuck about Americans, or our Rule of Law.

He is just another puppet of the bankers, and I laugh at peoplewho thoughtlessly defend his policies by raising their voice, and dissing others.
When I say they support government force, wars and, the Federal government being judge jury and, executioner. It is totally correct, and justified because they support the War Monger Obama and his Federal Henchmen.

 

For the billionth time - disagreeing with you (or merely questioning your sources) does not mean someone is worshipping Obama. There is a huge grey area here that you seem unwilling to acknowledge.

 

A black flag that was briefly flying outside the Benghazi courthouse is enough for you is it? You do seem to be basing it on a picture. How DID he support Al Qaeda in Libya?

No, not all of them' but I would I would presume some, and some can spell in English better than we can...

 

Obviously you have trouble with reading comprehension. I never saod "everyone who doesn't agree with me." I specifically said "people who support Obama."

So stop putting words in my mouth. If you support his policies, that's YOUR bad, for not looking into what he does. You don't have to agree with me to realize he's a criminal war monger just like Bush, and has done nothing for our economy or country, except skyrocket the debt and perpetuate the BS war on terror.

There is no "Good" that he's done. If Obama is "good" than Bush in an angel. Democrats/Liberals STILL blame Bush for signing the patriot act, but are totally silent abut Obama signing it-TWICE.

Whoever approves of Obama deserves the term "ignorant," they hate his policies when they think ROMNEY supports them, but they totally give Obama a pass to be as corrupt as possible.

THIS is what they look like...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prtKw0y2WgU"]Obama Supporters Are Idiots - YouTube


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XaTsFjjBpg"]Obama Supporters Don't Know Obama - YouTube

 

Can we put an end to this one. Can you just STOP referring to 'Obama supporters'? It would help a great deal.

 

Holy fuck dude, seriously. I do NOT support the majority of things Obama has done or authorized during his presidency. Including, but not limited to, the NDAA and authorization of drone strikes across the middle east and Africa. I am 100% NOT an Obama supporter.

That said, I also disagree with most of your opinions. I hold a different opinion than both yourself and Obama.

 

Why should I? They still openly blame Bush and Republicans. I have a reason to dislike Obama; People who support him, do it blindly, regardless of his policies.

He's perpetuated the war spending, debt, and, attack on our Liberty 10 fold. The man is a treasonous coward; A man who hides behind good acting, to justify his forceful and tyrannical administration.

There's hypocrisy just in his Disarmament views. He wants to take guns away, but leave guns in the hands of GOVERNMENT, who sells them to Mexico and GIVES them to Al Qaeda.

Obama's Administration is full of lies and hypocrisies.

I enjoy talking about it, because Obama supporters wont even acknowledge the truth about him.

First, /i got yelled at for using the word "Liberal," people said "We don't all support Obama." Now, I can't say "Obama supporters?" If you support Obama, you knowingly or inadvertently support everything he stands for.

You can't pick and choose what is right, without every wrong thing that comes with it.

If Romney supported the stuff Obama does, Obama supporters would have a field day. Because it's Obama, and people trust his lies and rhetoric, all f a sudden, everything's fine, and anyone who questions the government is "Crazy conspiracy theorist ruining this country"

pssshhh They might as well support BUSH. It's the same damn thing. If not, than Obama's worse. Bush didn't execute any citizens for no reason!

 

Then, I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about people that openly support Obama, and blame republicans for any of his faults. Not you.

You're more than welcome to disagree.

 

Because we always end up with three or more posts from either side that are remarkably the same. I didn't mention anything about Obama's policies and you have gone off on one of your little speeches again...
If you were more specific with regards to people and what they have said, and not speak about 'Obama supporters', it might be a little more constructive.

If you like talking about Obama so much: How DID he support Al Qaeda in Libya?

 

I don't mind disagreeing with crazy people. Obama does not support Islamic terrorists and I'm sure he never will. Unlike the crazy people, I do not believe he is, or ever was, a Moslem.

 

The religion is called Islam.

 

He armed them bigtime and even provided Air Power as in ground attacks against Libyan Gov. forces. The thanks we got for this support was the murder of our US Ambassador and his staff once the rebels took over. You can read about that here:
http://rt.com/usa/us-libya-security-cable-527/

US military support for Libyan rebels here:

http://www.npr.org/2011/04/04/135103441/u-s-role-in-libya-airstrikes-extended-short-term

warnings about Libyan rebels here:

http://tarpley.net/2011/03/24/the-cia%E2%80%99s-libya-rebels-the-same-terrorists-who-killed-us-nato-troops-in-iraq/

And now we are doing exactly the same things is Syria. Why is that ? And why do you and so many others here in this forum defend these actions ? Since when is it hip to have no sense of self preservation ? In many ways the koran is the same as mien kampf [ hitler`s plan to take over the world ]. Hitler said it,and he meant it, and he came very close to doing it. It was only because of Soviet Union that he failed. And Stalin was every bit as bad as hitler. But he did force his people to fight back and they did defeat the nazis with some help from the US and the western allies. In case you don`t know it the western allies did not get seriously involved in the land war until the summer of 1944. The USSR had already defeated Germany. Had we not gotten involved when we did the USSR would have rolled through Germany and there would have been no force in place to prevent them from taking over ALL of Europe.
In my opinion: The ONLY thing that stopped Stalin was that we had the atomic bomb and Stalin did not. Stalin had no problem with losing large numbers of troops to achieve his goals. The USSR lost about 10 million soldiers and about 10 million civilians in his efforts. The USA lost about 400,000 in all. Both the war against Japan and Germany. Figures are about the same for the UK. Poland lost about 10 million. China lost about 20 million in it`s war with Japan. Wikipedias casualty numbers for WWII. HERE:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

With atomic bombs in any future WORLD WAR those numbers will probably be relatively small. And I doubt America will be as fortunate as it was in that war. We are THE BIG SATAN as far as moslem jihadists are concerned or so they keep telling us. So do you think these moslem jihadists want peace ? DO YOU ? ...Oscar

 

Oscar. In the words of Jack Nicholson "they just can't handle the truth". Let me draw your attention to Suisse. The country has made isalm a felon. What could be more advantagous? Just don't let them in.

Being a nudist ; many of us have found that one way of clearing the area of moslems is to make clothing optional. Another is PDA. moslems are so sexually inhibited that public making out disgudts them. Perhaps a more sexually permissive society could expell our moslem dilemma. Make love not war, folks.

 

This thread is about Obama supporting islamic terrorists, riptide. Not about muslims that have nothing to do with either terrorism or Obama.

By the way, your statement about Switserland is false. You are spreading misinformation.

 

Incorret , Asmoden , we were just advised in previous posts and other sites that Suisse has made birkas , hijabs , mosks and minirets illegal. France is debating the same. Good move. This is an easier road to take as opposed to futre internment camps or worse yet jihad. Religious war. Crusade. Avoid jihad don't admit them.

Ah , let me instruct you. oby supports terrorism. oby props up moslem dictatorships with US $'s .......Can you say egypped?

 

They have not made islam a felony, there's a big difference. The netherlands banned burkas and other full face masking clothes as well. An understandable decision which makes much more sense than banning a religion as a whole. Which I don't see happening in Switserland at all.
I can also understand why a non islamic country would not like any minarets. This also is quite different then banning the religion. Your idiotic fantasy remains just a fantasy.

 

Sounds like you and other euros are starting to feel the fear ; as well. Good for you. You're coming along just fine.

 

Sounds like you made another ludicrous false assumption in your hope and hateful urge to prove something that isn't the case at all. It is you who still has to learn how to deal with the facts.

Who here seems exactly like the one who feels fear? It is you my friend and it is obvious