So what do you guys think of this? http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/travel/09heads.html?_r=1&oref=slogin That's pretty fuckin' disgusting. I don't think people should make money for showing rich jerks what it's like to live in poverty. Anyone's gut reaction is the same? It's an interesting counterpoint to the, stay at a resort, never see anything real of the country brand of tourism. But it does reek of exploitation. Their justifications reek of rationalization. It's one thing to go backpacking, to actually live and surround yourself with the dirt and slums around you, but to do a tour and go home to your champagne... it's just sick. And it's perpetuating the tourist industry. Everything else is oversaturated for tourists, so new niches are found and exploited?? Thoughts?