MSN Of course, the question might be, why? Their results indicate that the brightness of any light is comparable to mass, which makes sense since E=MC(2), and suggests that time is the issue. As if brighter light starts to become indistinguishable from mass, which is theoretically true, and you should be able to use a hot enough beam of light, to create mass from energy. Polarity comes into the picture in interesting ways with, for example, quantum mechanics finally answering the question of why chirality applies to everything in nature, as reflecting electrons spin having a preference for magnetic fields. Its related to Dimension Squeezing, which means the more we learn about nature's overall bias, the less we can know about any of the individual content we are studying, and the issue must inevitably focus on the observer supplying some of the content, because they're describing a self-organizing system. Just as there is no real answer for the Big Bang being "just right", the bias of nature in general should turn out to be "just right".