Now this question has vexed me for probably close to twenty years now. In Shakespeare's "Hamlet", Hamlet says (yes I know with irony): "What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form and moving how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of animals!" We're the paragon of animals because of evolution, aren't we? An atheist professor we had in 2000 said the ancients were well aware of evolution. Or at least by Shakespeare's time. And people were aware of a lot of other things (did you know in ancient Greece they already knew about the atom?). Now people are quick to point out that Shakespeare called us a piece of work because he thought we had a Creator. All right, all right already. But that wasn't my question. Also many Christians doubt that he knew about evolution. But what do they know? Thank you in advance for your help .
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution happened centuries after Shakespeare. So you are saying some people had similar theories centuries before? Stage plays are about emotions, philosophy and a mirror on life rather than science.
Selective breeding was practiced on animals and plants in prehistoric times. The Romans, Carthaginians, and Persians all practiced it. Corn, or maize, is an excellent example. So there was some understanding of evolution before Shakespeare's time. Robert Bakewell was the first in modern times to introduce systematic selective breeding in the 1700s. Did Shakespeare have an understanding or was he even aware of selective breeding practices in the 1500s? Who knows?
The idea of a hierarchy of existence goes back to antiquity: Great Chain of Being | Definition, Origin, & Facts . It's an extreme understatement to say that I don't claim any expertise on this.
Leonardo was aware of a few things as well. What happens with us from time to time is de evolution in various forms for various reasons. Often when we emerge from this. We may only slightly ascend. A good question ought to be. When did we first acquire sentience? & once so can we lose it?
At which point the question arises, what exactly constitutes sentience? My own particular form of it grapples with the answer...
Thanks & i dont think we are alone in having it. But even so in some cases we could be the least sentient.