Planets are born. Change my mind.

'Spectacular' image shows planet formation in action – Physics World​

 

Its a universal recursion in the principle of identity, and planets actually express particle-wave duality. For example, we measure both the Big Bang and Dark Energy accelerating the expansion of the universe. That's because they express particle-wave duality, and are equivalent to staring into infinity in four or more dimensions. You have your choice, and either the universe began with the Big Bang, which measurements have determined was "just right", or the universe is eternal and had no beginning. Either way, neither the Land Before Time nor eternity, makes more than the most superficial abstract sense, so you have your choice. Likewise, every galaxy has a giant black hole, and they appear to produce stellar nurseries, and you could argue everything in the universe is born, but the evidence for the Big Bang suggests that's merely what we can wrap our heads around, because we ourselves must always decide, what is alive and what is dead, because the two are context dependent, as is the passage of time itself.

 

We're rejects from another solar system

 

Biology contains all science in an organised fashion. The rest of the fields are erratic and chaotic.

 

Birth: . The emergence of something from the body of its mother; the start of life as a physically separate being.
Creation: . The action or process of bringing something into existence.
Therefore, "Where for art thine's Mother"???

 

Did an Eukaryotes once give birth to an unlimited total of estimate of further microscopic Eukaryotes during a timeless chain reaction we know as space time? Was prokaryotes the original RNA? They came first. What kind of cells do not have a membrane-bound nucleus? It's a biological process.

 

I have No clue Doc - lol

 

Physicists like to say, "Its turtles all the way down baby!" Eukaryotes don't stand a chance!

 

<offtopic>I find it difficult to believe the universe has not existed forever and will not exist forever at least within the limited human understanding of "forever" and "time." Maybe our galaxy or chunk of the universe has a finite timeline but outside of us shit has always been and always will be.</offtopic>

 

And another solar system will be rejects from us!

 

If either life or quantum mechanics ever make perfect sense to you, smoke a joint.

 

I thought we are all living in the eye of a blue eyed giant named Macumber

 

The blue is the "Tidy Bowel".

 

I'll drink to that

 

Richard Feynman explains in Quantum Electrodynamics that 'nothing' is unstable from which matter/antimatter (electron/positron) pairs can spring spontaneously. It is a rare event and most immediately recombine thus annihilating each other, but the few that survive make up all the matter that exists. Therefore the universe (or polyverse) must be far bigger and older than we currently estimate.

 

Love this guy

 

An interesting perspective on oxygen, carbon and plants.
Did anyone else picture Ed Norton from the Honeymooners talking about this?

 

Nobody has ever witnessed the formation of a planet, and, unfortunately, theory, in science, isn't good enough. You need verifiable proof.