On Obama's inauguration

Senate not paying taxes isn't new... I'm not worried about it, its trivial... they'll never pay taxes

Alex Jones is just a theorist... but everything he does say about the media having their own political agenda is true... that's nothing new... they are extremely powerful, why wouldn't they use their power to get what they want? They already have

I hate when people compare our politics with Hitler's... dude was on methamphetamine's and other pharmaceutical cocktails, and he had syphilis... of course that dude was mental... Alex Jones said Bush was taking us towards fascism too when he was in office... he wasn't totally inaccurate in terms of his individual policies he put in place, but we still aren't a fascist nation are we? And apparently any fascist type policies put in place by one president can be undone or reconstructed by the next, so, I doubt we'll be seeing full fascism anytime soon

all presidents have been puppets since JFK, a conspiracy theory, but it also holds a lot of validity if you've ever read into it... there's just really nothing at all we can do about it, large corporations making political contributions will always happen, and that kind of funding will always result in some sort of alterior agenda for our politicians, presidents, senators, whoever... its a lot similar to the music industry, you get funding from a record label to achieve your dream, now its we own you, so produce what we want, or we'll take your money away

I love how he says the mainstream media throws hyped up propaganda at us, then he quotes ABC news about Guantanamo Bay... I'm not sure whether what he says about the torture camps is true, but I'd rather look into it from other sources... Alex Jones makes good points when he handles hard facts, but Id never entirely trust his word about anything without validating it from other sources, he is extremely bias

Obama will bring change for sure, so I dont think he should be saying he won't... all presidents do... whether its for the better or worse is just a matter of opinion

 

What exactly did Kennedy accomplish? You don't think he owed the press for keeping his love life, Cushings and Addison's disease private?

 

McCain would have been equally bad, but he doesn't have Messiah status. McCain would have tried to put forward the same exact policies that Obama will, but probably with much less success. As I have said before, the policies Bush put forward, which were decried by his objectors, will be embraced when put forward under Obama using the banner of "change" and "hope."

 

First of all, history doesn't tell us half about Hitler or where he even came from. The same people that pulled Hitler's strings are the same people pulling the strings of our presidents, past and present. It's all international business at the top. War is simply a dialectical mechanism to move the world in a pre-planned direction as envisioned by those wielding the real power.

Regarding fascism, Benito Mussolini once stated that fascism should be more accurately referred to as corporatism, as it is the merger of the corporation with the state, which is precisely what we have here today. Albeit, it is a VEILED form of fascism. I would actually call it scientific socialism. But yes, we are looking at the emergence of a neo-feudalist system managed by the corporations, which even Carroll Quigley stated it would be back in 1966.

 

If McCain had won there would be outright chaos in the middle east the Isrealis would have openned war on Palestine, Lebanon, Syra and Iran. With the optimism that the US would fund and finish their actions. Thank god it did happen. Then they would contol the water, and all the resources of the area in the name of their biblical god, whom they can't even call by name. Why is that?

 

It's possible, but I don't think things would be much different than they are now. Obama is certainly not anti-war. Knowing some of the people behind Obama, I definitely expect we can see more manufactured crises involving Russia in the not-so-distant future.

 

What do you mean by that? Bush certainly isn't a Christian, and neither are most of these Republican frauds. They simply play the role. I mean, Bush is a member of Skull and Bones, so his real allegiance is there, not with the bible.

 

So Merlin, whatever happened with NAFTASUPERHIWAY,and the AMERO,are those on hold now ??(even tho Corsi & you claim work had already begun in '05) Not to mention all of the "Black Op" that were supposed to happen before Bush left office (that were supposed to keep Bush in office indef.)

 

It did begin in '05 with the Trans-Texas Corridor, which will eventually be the starting point of the NAFTA superhighway. Nothing has changed and the plans are still moving ahead, though they have encountered a lot of opposition from people and many kinks in the road, so to speak. I have seen no evidence that their plans have been abandoned. These people work incrementally, it doesn't happen overnight.

 

What kind of a person names their son "Carroll" anyway? Who is pulling those strings, eh?

 

Well, Quigley was an elitist. We know who was pulling his strings. He was the archivist for the CFR and very much a globalist.

 

*hisses like a black cat*

 

When they ran into problems with the NAFTA SuperHighway down here? People not wanting it and not liking it?

They just re-named it!!!

 

Yup, that's what they always do. Just throw a name on it that leads people to believe it's something other than what it really is. People hear "Trans-Texas Corridor" and believe it simply applies to Texas, when it is simply one small part of something that will eventually become a whole lot bigger and extend well beyond Texas.

 

Boy, I can't wait until we colonize planets.

 

Rat? Even though i don't agree with everything you say/have said,

rest assured,

i will NEVER "troll" your threads.

Ari? You are in desperate need of some flippin' GLASSES!!! Your near-sightedness is horrifying, to say the least. With practically every post, you show your inability to even catch a glimpse of the Big Pic, and your constant nit-picking over the most trivial of points is growing tiresome.

i'm really sorry that Rat got sucked in, AGAIN, to your distracting "Let's wrap this thread around an axle" tactics, especially if the best you can do it berate his FEELINGS about the folks he cites.

How's about we do something a little different, for a change?

Why don't you act like a MODERATOR, and be an EXAMPLE to others of how to CORRECTLY respond to threads, instead of your constant desire to bicker and confuse the issues?

Now, THAT would be Change i could believe in! :rofl:

 

I fart in your general direction.

 

You'll be needing the NAFTA SuperHighway to get it down here! :rofl:

 

She makes a very accurate and relevant point, though. (I am referring to Fyrenza.)

 

Wow so they are building a highway to Mexico? That's practically like merging the two countries together!

Of course i jest, its just that Rat has been caught lying about the highway so many times I can't even count.

The media issue is quite simple - Rat can quote "the media", we can't. When he is quoting it, he is doing it as a very advanced scholar of history and full of deep wisdom, when we are doing it we do it as brainwashed sheep. The media is correct when it says something he likes, incorrect when it doesn't. Its a simple rule that ensures Rat can never, ever be wrong.

Conspiracy media isnt that different. After being repeatedly humiliated for promoting conspiracy websites that were full of complete lunacy, bigotry, or just embarassingly stupid errors, Rat stopped endorsing the websites although he still uses the stories. Its a bit awkward but its the best he can do. Its a bit like Xexon who claims he isn't a Nazi, its just that Nazi websites have good information on jews.