*NON-Hater Circumcision Thread* - Please Read!

yeh mine looks more like that last one. I never had any problems with the skin being stretchy enough, i can roll it back completly off the head without any pain. I supose if i couldent it would be a problem, but maybe mines just like that because i have a habit of pulling it back when i pee, so that keeps it movable.

 

God, is that thing ugly. Trim your hair atleast, for Christs sake!

 

All penises are supposed to have fully retractable foreskins. The only people who can't retract their foreskins are babies because it normally takes a few years before the foreskin retracts fully.

If you are over the age of 10 and your foreskin isn't retracted fully or it's painful then seriously you should see a doctor about it because it's never supposed to hurt.

 

What's wrong with it? Seems to be porn to me and is forbidden on this site. Read the rules and get back to me.

 

Thats a pretty poor response Bug Man. You stated it was ugly, and Blah asked what was wrong with it. It is clearly not porn, it is educational and entirely in keeping with an adult debate on the merits of cut vs uncit.

 

REad your original comment again homefry - you said your Mom said it had to be retracted EVERY time u bathed - I presumed you bathed before the age of 7 - least they do where im from.

Hehe , so ur tryin to tell me you went and had someone take a knife to your cock and then LATER you found out it wasnt neccessary - you clearly got the brains from your mother's side chum.

In fact if you had bothered to do much research you would have come across topical steroidal creams which cause growth in the foreskin around any sticking point to the glans - surgery is really only neccessary in cases of major deformities.

 

Hey this thread has non hater specified in the name. Even if you are being atacked, you dont have to respond angrily. With anyone who is continously ofencive without anyone being rude back we can just ask the mod to deal with it.

 

Fair point - my original post was to educate and certainly not to cause offence - i just responded in kind.

 

theres something about circumsision that causes yelling and screming to come up down the line. I think its because of the issues of religion, decisions, mom's, denial, and the controversial "woman love it" vs. "Woman hate it" idea. ( SOME THINK THEY ACTUALLY KNOW THE GENERAL WORLDWIDE RESPONSE/PREFERENCE WOMAN HAVE ON AN UNCUT DICK)

http://www.the-penis-website.com/index.html

 

(from the-penis-website.com)
Is it mutilation? Well, yes, it is. The traditional, no-anesthetic approach, where the baby boy's foreskin is drawn up, clamped and cut off, is cruel in the extreme. To argue that the boy has no feeling in his penis is clearly ludicrous - and the reactions of the baby reveal the trauma produced by the operation. But suppose that it is done with anesthetic? Does that make it more acceptable? The answer is "no", for many reasons, not least of which is that the operation tears open the natural adhesions which exist between the foreskin and the glans - these do not naturally separate until the boy is getting towards five or six years of age. If they are torn off in a circumcision, as they must be, the boy's glans forms scar tissue and can be painfully over-sensitive in later years, causing much distress when the glans is exposed to cold or touch or rubs on underwear. One defense of circumcision is that it produces a neater, nicer-looking penis in adulthood, but such fashions are only determined culturally - in countries where circumcision has not been practiced, there is no preference for the appearance of the circumcised penis.

 

http://www.the-penis-website.com/shape.html

i foudn that to be an excellent read. the study the author mentions is a little vague, with no true evidence, but if it was true....the uncut's 1, cuts 0

 

Yes i think the idea that it is neater is kind of odd, neat doesnt mean good. A vagina that was reduced to nothing but flat and then a hole would be neater, and more hygenic too, and if it was the norm people seeing a normal vagian would probably go EEW its got thoe flaps covering it and its mosit underneath and theres this bump at the top! But as we all know that stuff is good. The thing that doesnt look right about circumcised penises to me is the way the tip is as dry and rough as normal skin, and is almost the same color. The tip of mine is pink and smooth, kinda like the flesh a clitorus is made of i guess is the best likeness i can think of. It just seems like being exposed so it toughens would really make it less sensitive.
As for the issue of pleaseing women. Women vary widely, thats obvious and true in many ways, some prefer the sliding friction of a cut cock, while some prefer the masaging rolling motion of an uncut cock. Some will only blow a guy whos got no foreskin, some will do it to a uncut guy if he cleans it right, which someone should tell a guy how to do when hes young, just like you tell them to wash any thing else. There are even some women who wont do oral on a cut guy but will on a uncut guy, cause it looks odd to them, just like you would probably stop if you were gonna give oral to a girl and you saw that her covering skin had been removed.
And by the way, uncircumcised takes to long to type, the common word for it is, intact.

 

Serious question here...

I've only ever seen un-cut dicks (not got a problem with them at all...most people in the UK are un-cut)...but aren't there veins in the foreskin? When it's erect they stick out a bit and you can definitely see them so isn't it really dangerous to circumsise someone?

Also doesn't it hurt when wanking? Cos it hurts if you pull the foreskin too far back so wouldn't the penis be realyl sensitive and painful underneath?

Sorry if this sounds dumb

 

well my cousin is circumcised and he said it was so sensitive he had to go without pants for a long time and just had a blanket, cause with no skin to cover it it hurt too much, but over time i guess it toughens and gets less sensitive. It doesnt sound good to me, and i dont know why he did it when he was old enough to choose.