NASA re-revises position on the Big Bang

i thought you didn't like callin it anti-matter

 

Its handy in situations when you are talking about matter/anti-matter interactions, I just feel it causes a lot of misconceptions amount the general public.

 

I regard The Big Bang as fact.

 

Hah, religion is just as much opinion as any scientifically unknown theory, if not moreso. NASA shouldn't worry about religion--after all, they have some of the brightest people in the country working for them.

 

Here is a lawyer's critique of Johnson's book Darwin On Trial;

http://www.talkreason.org/articles/honesty.cfm#part1

 

The big bang theory is just that, a theory. I do not believe it's correct because it's assumed that there was a definite beginning and end to the universe, something we do not know near enough about to be making predictions about how and if it started. It is more likely to just be perpetual forming and re-forming of universes, with no beginning or end.