I know what you mean, and I think that's how most people feel, but I see a moral stance as something concrete. Maybe that's not the general view of what a moral is, though.
The moral groundwork is what is normally concrete, but the consequences of those grounds can be interpreted in many different ways (ie, a 2 kantians may act very differently in certain situations, whilst both sticking to the categorical imperatives)
Life is full of it's essential mediums. The "grease" is amid, to turn the wheels of all evolving concepts in life, descrete and detailed. We live to discover such resources to feed the ongoing process of living. There are singular parts, there are entire systems, there are patterns and there are changes. Above all there is the need to keep up with the change, no matter what part is played. Life is an ongoing parity, morals, like society, is the baggage to catch the excesses of developing produces within existence. Perhaps why we refer to things of successive effort as being "fruitful". An harmonious encompassment of perception.
