Hmm. Thats odd. That article is from a right wing, pro 2nd amendment site. And yet the tone of the article seems to imply that exercising 2nd amendment rights in this particular case is a bad thing. I wonder why?
It's OK. They aren't white and standing there with any Republican candidates sign. It's not the same thing. Man you gotta do better at speaking Libtard. Libtrard logic= Security patrol in this picture. Reverse the picture and they would be Trump loving redneck racist intimidating black voters. Got it now?
I dont really believe they were outside a polling place as it is illegal to stand outside a polling place with political signs. You cant believe everything you read on a conservative blog, believe it or not Other sources say they were marching through the streets of Atlanta, not standing at a polling location. Obviously if they WERE at a polling location what they were doing is illegal, but i just havent seen any proof that was the case And i dont really care either way if a militant conservative group or a militant black power group wants to open carry, you guys know how I feel about guns but open carry is legal in Georgia with a permit, I can only presume they have permits and if not, thats up to law enforcement and has nothing to do with any of us and our opinions But I really cant help but notice some of those who are most passionate and vocal about advocating for 2nd amendment rights dont seem to think those same rights apply to this particular group, and I cant help but wonder why That isnt libtard logic, just plain ol' logic
Ummm the only mention of them being at a polling station is the part where the Black Panthers said they were in 2008. I don't know where any part of the right wing publisher stated anything about it being outside a polling station in these pics. I'm sure I'm wrong........ somehow. Libtard logic requires it. Nothing in that piece stated it was bad thing they were exercising their 2A rights. More Libtard logic. Their question was correct, how would it be perceived if White Men from a racist organization stood around with guns supporting Kemp. That's a question we all know the answer to. Let's see if the national media picks this up.
Ok. I'm not really clear why the article, you, and orison all mentioned that they're intimidating voters if they're not at a polling place. It would only be voter intimidation if they were, ya know, hanging out a place where people vote But i'll just let it go lest i get caught up in some kd logic
I guess my position would be that it does create intimidation around the issue of that particular political contest. I definitely have a problem seeing guns. I don't like them. I think they do create intimidation and that that's the purpose of most men who open carry. The protection argument is pretty meaningless to my ears. Some people may have seen the article I posted in the score card thread about militias taking up arms and going to "aid" at the border. I feel like this is less offensive than that. Seems like I double standard, but I'm not sure it is.
WTF? Not my party. I'm hoping to see both Oprah and Kemp step up and denounce them and reject their support. Just as they demand Trump do to his racist supporters.
It's a classic movie line. So post your predictions or start your own thread, which I presume will be titled 'libtards'.
