Michael Jackson Did Not Rape Any Little Boys!

well, what i do know is that your not the jury, so whatever you are saying is just as much bullshit as anybody else who is saying he is guilty. seriously, let the court handle this...

 

Um I know the evidnce presented by both sides, the backgrounds of the scuzz accusing him of these crimes, and the testimony given, so please don't compare the FACTS I know to the BULLSHIT everyone else puts on here simply because you don't like Michael Jackson. Okay?

 

I say that his body guards are guilty of not protecting Michael Jackson from himself. I think Michael Jackson is guilty of being in a state of big denial. Instead of running to the hospital with back pain, maybe he should have a full-time therapist on staff. I also think any parent who allows his/her child to "play" with Michael Jackson is guilty of poor judgement or hungry for deep pockets.

 

personally, i think he should be locked up just for looking the way he does. imagine wakin up with that muthafucker in your face

 

Why do any of you care? He's just another weirdo. Why does it matter whether he fucked those boys or not?

 

why does it matter if you were raped as a little boy or not?

why does it matter if someone who likes to screw little boys is running around free and doing it constantly, shit less competition for jobs for not fucked up people huh?

 

Hahahah. What I mean is, why do you care about jackson particularly? This is surely a matter that need only concern those who are actually involved in it, not random gawkers .

 

Is MJ on trial for allegedly abusing children or for being weird?

No matter how weird or rich MJ may be, as an American he has the right to be tried on the basis of the facts...and absolutely nothing else.

Too many people have their minds made up one way or the other without all of the evidence.

Yes, MJ makes me a bit uncomfortable but that's not illegal. Yes, as a man who is believed to be rich he is a target for all sorts of con artists. With so much garbage being put out about MJ, this is going to be a tough trial and I'm glad I'm not on the jury.

If MJ only "made love to" young boys and didn't "rape" them, he's still technically guilty. There is such a thing as age of consent laws. If you have sex with someone who is under age, you are guilty of rape because that person is incapable of consent.

 

So people who are considered "scuzz," by you, have no rights in the Justice System if they are defied and harmed? That isn't Democracy.

 

Of course they deserve their rights, I'm just saying people need to think twice about believing these people. The woman has coached her son to win her $$$$$ in past lawsuits (JCPenny). She printed adds in the papers that broke peoples hearts saying her son was dying, and she had no $ to help him. Sure enought the community pitched in and she got $12,000. But guess what! Her husbands insurance covered the boys hospital bills COMPLETELY. The mother admitted in court she used the $$$$$ to buy makeup and clothes. She also tricked 2 police officers into buyin her a "free Christmas" in essence, because they bought her a tree and decoratios and presents, but when they arrived she already had plenty of presents and nice clothes on. They were just too cheap and wanted stuff for free. Plus she is guilty of welfare fraud and being a patient in a mental hospital on 2 occasions (not a joke).

 

seriously dude your not the jury, and nomatter how much you "know" your still not going to make a difference in this. if the jury says hes guilty then he is guilty. and no, i dont like mike and that makes me bias, do you happen to know what that means? THAT IM NOT ON THE FUCKING JURY AND IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT I THINK ABOUT THE CASE! i said before to let the jury decide. you know what else? youre bias too, that means you are not and cannot be on the jury..so your reasearch and what you know is bullshit, just like any of mine would be.

 

No what I know isn't bullshit it's facts so please stop fucking acting like I'm making this shit up. And yes I am biased, because i'm a big fan of Michael Jackson. Never said I could be on the jury. Of course what I have to say doesn't effect the outcome of the trial, but I am trying to show people the truth in the case whether I can get it through their fat ass thick skulls or not, cuz i don't want to hear their stupid ass shit and complaining that Mike got off "cuz he's rich" or stupid crap like that.

 

so.. you know that you cant effect the outcome? well i see that as a step foreward. now you have to realize that because you cant that means that your reasearch means absoulutely nothing. you should really stop being so sull of yourself, its not like your the beacon of truth in this whole mess. and because your bias you automatically discredit any thing that you hear bad about him, just like i would anything good. do you see me sitting here condemming him? thats right, no, you don't. i never said you were making anything up, i said your reasearch is bullshit because it has no value whatsoever. your so-called "truth" could be proved wrong..but then again..you wouldnt accept that now would you?

 

Wow, you totally got me. I am soooooo full of myself, honestly I am.....*sarcasm*, also I am a beacon of light, here to spread the truth.........whatever that means. No, people were ganging up on him in this thread, so I decided I would try to defend him. That's all. I'm no "beacon of light" and actually I'm not full of myself at all. I know what I ahve 2 say is useless in the outcome, but it is still worth hearing. That's all. I'm really tired of trying to show people there are 2 sides to this case. I just get ganged up on and trashed so whatever. You can all just sit here and trade jokes about him for all care.

Peace!

 

i havent been making jokes or saying hes gulty or not, try reading all of the posts(it might just help).

 

_Key operative words here are MY parents, not a stranger.

Is Michael Jackson guilty? The jury of his peers would decide that, meanwhile, he is innocent.

 

I was about to say...

 

The majority have.. imho 2cool was just earnestly trying to convey a few truths or facts about certain things , if you read all of them you may have gathered that.. The fact that it may have come across as 'full of themselves' was maybe because 2cool was not perpetuating myths and fucked up jokes that were funny maybe well erm never . Great you have not been joining in very 'mature' of you (sarcasm) .

 

The issue is not about how the mom is a fraud or the little boy is a bully, its about Michael Jackson molesting the little boy, just because the mother is a stupid little bitch doesnt mean that Michael jackson is innocent. Hes guilty and going to jail. The evidence is there.

 

im just trying to make it clear that none of our opinions matter in this. im not attacking anyone.