Meat without animals!?

Discussion in 'Alternative Technologies' started by mymagic123, Feb 26, 2008.

  1. sexylilunicornbutt

    sexylilunicornbutt Member

    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds great to me. I don't know where all the cows and chickens are going to go. The worst thing about the industry is the numbers in which these animals are slaughtered. It's repulsive and, dare I say, crazy.

    So manufactured meat would be cool. And like, if some people want to keep a cow to milk and a chicken to eat its eggs here and there, okay. Just don't lock the things into cages by the tens of thousands. I don't think you can argue that that is necessary.
     
  2. Any Color You Like

    Any Color You Like Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    3
    Just eat less meat, but fake meat...? that's too unnatural...
     
  3. xexon

    xexon Destroyer Of Worlds

    Messages:
    3,959
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ask yourself this question: Do I want to eat something that was grown in a laboratory, with chemicals?

    If you answer yes, you'd probably eat margarine too.


    x
     
  4. Crazy Horse

    Crazy Horse Member

    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    My first concern would be the health effects of this GMO meat. We're seeing that already.
    The other effect of a technology like this would be that it would make us far more dependent on specialists (genetic scientists) and increase centralization of food production.
     
  5. Crazy Horse

    Crazy Horse Member

    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    And it's creepy.
     
  6. verseau_miracle

    verseau_miracle Banned

    Messages:
    7,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    Im vegan and this idea is fucked up
    But i mean if its a choice between the mass production and farming madness we have now or this then id be all for people shoving bits of flesh grown in a lab down their throats
    What id advise however is they did neither and either bought responsibly or didnt eat it full stop!
    Of course "buying responsibly" would eventually leave a bit of a conundrum, as more and more people would be wanting meat from local organic free rabnge farms etc and those farms would expand and begin mass producing to meet the demand, so ultimately, not meaning to sound like a bore, but youre better off not touching the stuff, for a multitude of reasons
    Unfortunately that would never happen either, so test tubes it is
     
  7. Crazy Horse

    Crazy Horse Member

    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    But isn't "buying responsibly" a contradiction? Capitalism leaves us inherently powerless in all aspects of our lives, but most notably in terms of food security. Something like this would remove us even further from the source of life, and sever completely the complex relationship between predator and prey. As if it were not enough damaged already by industrial agriculture. Don't get me wrong, I feel the same way about my relationship with plant foods. Capitalism- and more generally, civilization- has followed a consistent pattern: More control, more centralization, more dependent on specialists and experts, more mediation by the machine. It seems many of you are perfectly willing to march lock-step into a future where non-human life forms have no independent existence at all.
     
  8. woodsman

    woodsman Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    2
    Stop the destruction of farmland and you won't have the problem.
     
  9. drumminmama

    drumminmama Super Moderator Super Moderator

    Messages:
    17,776
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    War started when man became farmers. Funny, in the history I learned, people also have fought over water sources, and hunting grounds, and the chance to reproduce (capture women).
    That was too simple, and I know you are smarter than that.
     
  10. Crazy Horse

    Crazy Horse Member

    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    There was conflict, to be sure, but to say there was war would be a gross exaggeration. War as we understand it today requires a degree of social complexity and hierarchy that simply did not exist before domestication and agriculture. Nor was it necessary. Despite what you may have learned in history class, modern archaeology is revealing that paleolithic life was far more egalitarian than the "nasty, brutish and short" picture that civilizations apologists like to paint.
     
  11. verseau_miracle

    verseau_miracle Banned

    Messages:
    7,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    That was kind of my point
     
  12. Crazy Horse

    Crazy Horse Member

    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm sorry, don't get me wrong- I wasn't trying to contradict you or anything, I just think that the fact that people are even considering this is another sign of the deepening crisis we're in... And I think if the people here are really concerned about the welfare of animals or the health of the planet, they should be very critical of this.
     
  13. verseau_miracle

    verseau_miracle Banned

    Messages:
    7,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    Completely, its just common sense really. But really, who would be foolish enough to rather stick genetically engineered flesh in their mouths than just forget about meat and live without it...oh, actually:rolleyes:...
     
  14. behindthesun93

    behindthesun93 Member

    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wonder what he cost and supplies demand will be
    and if there will be any chemicals in it.
    if vegetarians can manage without meat, why spend all of this money?
    I'll stick with my black beans.
     
  15. Crazy Horse

    Crazy Horse Member

    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    Your right, I absolutely would rather give up meat than eat something like that. I just don't think that's the solution either- the landbase where I live now simply could not support a vegan lifestyle without industrial agriculture, which is obviously not sustainable. And apparently what we think of as common sense is not nearly common enough, as some people seem to think this is a great idea.

    I'm sure it will be touted as the solution to world hunger, poverty, and blah blah blah. As for chemicals, I would look to the gentech already in existence, which is wreaking havoc on our bodies and the planet.
     
  16. ProfessorGroove

    ProfessorGroove Member

    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    1
    I hear people saying they don't eat meat because it is wasteful inefficient, and unfair to most of the hungry people in the world. What you may not know is there is more than enough food grown every year to feed everybody in the world many many times over. Political and Economic pressures are what cause people to starve not the lack of food. Many people here claim eating meat is wrong. Eating meat is natural. What is not natural is growing meat (? what is the term for this) in a lab. Also most of you seem to feel us people who do eat meat are immoral because we put ourselves before animals. I do in fact view myself as better than an animal (in certain ways) and I view them as better in other ways. This does not mean I disrespect them or am not grateful for the sustenance and pleasures they provide my life with (I also STRONGLY believe any creature man or beast deserves a quick painless and dignified death). You are in fact hypocrites because you do make distinctions about what is okay to eat and what is not . So it is safe to assume you put the life of a Cow, pig, or chicken above that of a squash, corn, or the weed you smoke.

    You cannot live without other organisms dying. It is a simple fact of life you are going to have to learn to live with. So why not enjoy a steak, it is one of the best ways to enjoy the beauties of nature, its sights sounds smells and tastes. Enjoy your life to the fullest. Your activism by not eating meat is ineffective, so why not instead put this energy towards bettering the treatment of animals at farms processing plants ecet. In order to be able to enjoy that animals bounty with a clear mind and heart? The meat isn't the problem, the system and peoples blatant disrespect for animals is.

    Another thought:

    The domesticated plants and animals you may or may not eat today are not natural occurances (by most of your standards) and did not exist the way you know them today 10,000 years ago. They are genetic inventions of man via selective breeding. They fill no other ecological role but to feed man. Most domesticated animals and plants as you know them today would fill no ecological niche if released and would go extinct unbelievably quickly. Therefore to release them would be inhumane and irresponsible. A great example of this is corn. I read a study that suggested corn would go extinct within 5 years if mans demand for it ceased.
     
  17. longcat

    longcat Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Soylent Green - yeah its here now
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice