Me too, but I guess it also depends on the sexual position I am in at the time. In some do in others don't. I kid. I kid. I much prefer the Do out of the two in this instance. If that makes sense.
Definitely prefer smaller boobs but I'm a "full package" guy so not going to get hung up on boob size.
Honestly, I'm an A Cup man myself-although medium to fairly big boobs can be nice, too. To me there's such a thing as 'too big', but not 'too small', if that makes any sense
More of a medium sized person myself, although I don't mind any size as long as they aren't gigantic.
big boobs are more attention-getting. All other things being equal, big ones are more appealing than small ones. Small boobs fit some chick's body types. Some of the girls/women I've been most attracted to have had small boobs. While big boobs are nice, boob size is not that important. Other aspects of appearance, personality, chemistry are much more important. Pretty much all natural boobs are fun. Fake boobs, while they may be initially more attention getting, are a turn off to play with. I suspect that most guys in the media of saying they like fake boobs are in fact paid agents of the fake-boob industry.
At this point in my life, I can safely say it all boils down to the person they are attached to. My personal preference on this is that they be small-ish, but I'm in love with someone who have fairly large ones. I think I made a post on this thread before, something to the effect of personal preferences merely being what they are - preferences -, and not something that should take full control of your life. I think it's also interesting to note that, even though my personal preference says "small", I sometimes enjoy watching video clips(I wouldn't classify them crudely as "porn" per se, but erotic, adult entertainment) where the models have large breasts, too. When this happens, however, the videos almost always also include some interviews with the models, or them just randomly talking, where you get to see the glimpse of their personalities a bit. Which sort of brings us back to the first thing I said in this post; in the end, it all comes down to the person they are attached to.
On the Doctors they said that men only prefer big boobs because society teaches them to, and there is no biological basis...
I think that lots of men (and women) aren't really in touch with what they really want and pursue what they think they are "supposed" to be attracted to. It's just conformity. Many also pursue what they think is "sought after", because perceiving that they are "winning the game" and getting superficial approval from society is what is most important to them. So this could be part of why so many men like big boobs. I'm also sure that the fake-boob industry would like to encourage a fascination with big boobs. "The Doctors" may be correct in the assertion that there is "no biological basis" for attraction to big boobs to the extent that boobs of all sizes can adequately feed infants. I don't think women should worry too much about boob size, since, IMO, it is only really important to men who are completely superficial (and even the completely superficial men would likely have other criteria for attraction too). As I've said before, I think big boobs are attention-getting and kind of appealing, but that's as far as it goes. However, the notion that "men only prefer big boobs because society teaches them to" is bullshit. Why would society conspire to create a fascination with big boobs? Why would some women have evolved to have big boobs? I don't think that human evolutionary biology is understood well enough to support the assertion that there is no biological basis for a preference for big boobs. There is also no evidence to support the notion that big-boob preference is only the product of cultural conditioning. This is not a criticism of you, Duck. You are just reporting what was said on "The Doctors".
ok, so I think that I know how the idea could be tested scientifically. First, find a population of men who prefer big-boobs, who have fathers that also prefer big-boobs. Of that population, focus on those who have infant sons. Then, kidnap their sons and raise them on a remote island, where they would neither see nor hear of females (i.e., there would be no cultural conditioning for big-boob preference). When the boys reach puberty, bring some big and small boobed females onto the island, and have them stand behind cardboard dividers, such that only their boobs can be seen. You could then identify their preference either by a) verbal indication b) tendency to get erections while looking at a specific boob-type or c) tendency to play with certain boob types Presumably, these boys would inherit the "big boob preference" gene, if it exists, and therefor a big boob preference would be present. I'm gonna start writing the grant proposal to send to the NSF...