LOOSE CHANGE: New 9/11 documentary receives media coverage

There were indeed both recorded testimonial from firefighters who heard multiple short burst explosion (as of cutter charges) as well as visual video data of multiple squibs on successive floors.

Youre right its no mystery. These buildings acted out of all historical precedence with buildings which were ravaged by actual infernos withut global calapse of the underlying frame. Even the building designer admitted that the collapses were abnormal.

Enough. Continue to make apology for the lies of an administration whose own agenda (PNAC) called for an event of this magnitude to be launched with sufficient public acquiescence. The full body of glaring inconsistencies and ridiculous coincidences upon which the "official" conspiracy theory rests is simply too implausible to the critical mind.

The documentary to which this thread was originally devoted demonstrates all too clearly the need for a full public judicial enquiry that will show 911 and all subsequent policies pertaining thereto to have been the treasonous crime of the century from the real terrorists presiding over our nation.

 

The squibs were dust being blown out windows from falling floors. That's not what cutter charges look like. They are bright flashes.

Many things could have made loud noises (sections of falling floors, for example). Demolition advocates immediately assume it was cutter charges, just as Jones claimed a piece of concrete was molten steel.

.

 

The squibs were bright flashes (not dust), obscured by the black smoke but there upon more detailed review of the video data.

 

Squibs aren't bright flashes, by definition. Squib is an ejection of dust or debris. It's a rather slang term for squeezing-out.

Cutter charges don't look like squibs. What was seen on the towers was debris being ejected out windows due to the collapse of the floors. That doesn't look like cutter charges.

.

 

I haven't seen any video evidence of what demolition advocates claim are bright flashes caused by cutter charges. It's possible that electrical equipment was shorting out. Power was still on in the towers. There were some flashes of fire coming out as sections of floors fell.

Does anyone realize how many cutter charges would have had to have been placed and without anyone knowing about it, and all right below where the aircraft struck in advance? If one thinks about this, it's an outrageous claim. The cutter charges themselves aren't enough to sever a beam. The beams have to be weakened by cutting them part-way before the charges are placed.

.