SO much wrong with what these people say. For example using different precursors is causing a different end chemical then MDMA to be manufactured. False, it just means one will take different steps to convert that precursor into what you are looking for. There are many ways to skin a cat in chemistry Also MDA requires different precursors then MDMA. No it's the same process for a good deal of the synthases. And of course the old "kid who died from it but it was not MDMA" story. If you want a good laugh have a watch. 12:40 for the start of MDMA discussion. http://youtu.be/_nzuEA6VUk4
I watched about a half hour of it, it didn't seem that bad. There didn't seem near as much disinformation as the standard news article covering a recreational MDMA story, maybe it was the English accent that sold me. I was actually quite surprised they mentioned PMMA, as that is a chemical that has become more prevalent only within the last few years in Ecstasy/Molly. Everything I've read about PMMA suggests it is more dangerous and potent than MDxx and a noteworthy concern.