i'd choose the poor guy, money isn't that big of a thing for me..my parents are fairly well off and i've had all sorts of materialistic things yet they hardly spent any time with me growing up, i was practically raised by the nanny having all this makes me realize i don't give a shit about any of it i'd much rather be able to spend time with the man that i love and if it comes down to it, we can live off my parents i suppose the defining factor for me would be, which one has a better sense of humor?
So you dislike guys with money and assume they all have attitude problems? I've already stated that they love you unconditionally so caution is irrelevent. So it looks like the richer guy would be best for you... No... The question was hypothetical and I asked you to choose one or the other. Who's the idiot now?
This was my reply to your post. This wasn't directed at you at all. There was nothing wrong with what you said. I'm just goofing around
If the guy with the lesser income who I had been with awhile worked as a teacher or for a non-profit and that is why he did not make a lot I would find him admirable and wouldn't think twice about going for the guy with more money because of the longevity of the relationship. If he had a lesser income because he was unmotivated, uneducated and had no desire to better himself I would go for the guy who made more because motivations is a big attraction for me and I like to travel and have nice things and be able to chose my career based on passion not money. I would never marry somone who couldn't be a good provider ( I don't mean rich I mean able to provide me with, 1.5 kids, a nice house, a volvo station wagon d: ...you get the idea the whole white picket fence package).
What if the richer guy told you that he values you more than a non-profit organisation and wants to give you the whole white picket fence package (no expense spared)? This isn't a trick question btw... most would take the 'safe' option and choose the poor guy to look good and humane to others reading this thread. In reality, life without financial constraint would give you time to truly be in your element without side tracking because of external issues.
Wrong. I don't give a shit what you people think about me. Sure if the poor guy was a bum - I would get tired of his lazy ass. BUT I would never leave someone for someone else. I pay my own way - I don't need a man to take care of me.
Anyone who truly knows me, such as CyndiLou or her sister AshtonsMom can tell you my answer was for real. I know a lot of people might say what they think makes them sound like a nice person, but asking either of the two screen names above, who have known me personally for years would tell you. Well, Cydni's sister doesn't know me as well as Cyndi, but she knows me well enough, I think.
What if you found a greater love in someone else? Would you stay with the guy you were originally with just because you want to be loyal?
I would have to be looking to find a greater love in someone else. And if I'm looking - that usually means I'm single.
thats not really true at least not for everyone, i mean like i said in my responce i know financial security and its not that great...i also know being broke, cause although my parents are fairly well off i ain't i would still choose someone i could have more freedom to be with than a rich man
