Kyle Rittenhouse video and audio analysis clearly shows...

From a first person point of view, far better to survive than perish

 

Please pay attention. The firearm was purchased in,and never left Wisconsin.

 

Follow the news the firearm was brought illegally

 

You shoot a person in the back and kill him . And then claim self defense ? His crying and then the defense lawyers calling for mistrial was a nice touch of acting . I wonder who couched him to do that ?

 

If a purple person had done that they'd be in jail for life.
If a young man of any race had done what KR did ,they would be acquitted too.
It's two completely different stories.
You'd see that if you were looking with an open mind.

 

I have and the person who purchased the firearm is facing that misdemeanor charge.
I was addressing the state line falsehood.

 

There is video of the shooting. If the man was actually shot in the back vs. one bullet entering his back, we'd know it.

 

And in your world George Floyd is a hero and not a violent felon who killed himself with a drug overdose, correct?

 

100% correct.
All of those violations are misdemeanors.

 

so very interesting this discussion that an event can be seen in diametrically opposing ways

 

Yeah--like trumps win of the election. Same shit--same people.

 

That would require a showing of premeditation and deliberation. No evidence to support that.

I don't know the Wisconsin law, but in some jurisdictions you'd be talking about second degree murder, which would involve a depraved mind and reckless disregard for human life. Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Shadow, maybe but a jury would have to infer it from the evidence, including Kyle's testimony. Unlikely. In a lot of jurisdictions voluntary manslaughter would also include and intentional killing "in the heat of passion". Involuntary manslaughter, involving criminal (gross) negligence would be another possibility: That would be more feasible. But as you say, that would be obviated by a finding of self-defense.