She doesn't defend or protect people who commit it. She also doesn't lie for a living, and took a polygraph as proof.
One of the many things that puzzles me about this, is why would some girl of college age like Swetnick go to highschool parties?
You would either have to not believe Ford Or not care that Kavanaugh is a sexual predator To think this is even relevant. Just because some are exploiting this for political gain (which really doesnt make sense anyways, the next appointment will be Trump's either way) doesnt take away from the fact that a sexual predator should not sit on the Supreme Court
Huh? She was 15 at the time. Kavanaugh was 17. It doesn't surprise me that you didn't even look up the facts before leaping to conclusions. Christine Blasey Ford - Wikipedia
Code of conduct for United States Judges I believe Kavanaugh's accusation of a conspiracy by Democrats and the Clinton's applies here. And he clearly believes the White House must be protected by the Supreme Court, not that the Supreme Court is an independent entity. First as to the law, that is what is being questioned. Second, as above, he doesn't believe the judiciary is impartial. He would not state that fact when interviewed. He thinks the U.S. v. Nixon decision was wrong. One word, Trump. And I'm going to skip some here for the sake of brevity. Check out the source. Watch the latest hearing. Remember he didn't want Ford to testify. And I'll just list a few more:
Fake victims only succeed in hurting real victims. I meant Julie Swetnick She graduated HS in 1980, Kavanaugh graduated in '83. That means that in '82 she was college aged, and attending highschool parties were gang rape was taking place. Why the hell would a college girl do this? She reportedly went to these kinds of parties 10 times. If you go to parties knowing that rape is taking place and fail to report it, then get assaulted yourself, you're not a victim, you're an accomplice.
That doesn't even make sense. I said Kellyanne probably isn't lying about the sexual assault. She does however lie for a living and is morally and ethically corrupt enough to use her own assault as a political weapon to protect someone who she knows has committed sexual assault.
Lots of assumptions being made here in this post. You are both suggesting that I either don't believe Ford or I am supporting a sexual predator. Brilliant. I am doing neither. But thanks for your assertions.
So you think the entire story falls apart because it's ridiculous to believe that a college age girl would go to a high school party? I know my high school girlfriend was 2 years younger than I was... it's not like a taboo or anything.
i'm not assuming anything about you personally I am just following logical thought in a general sort of way. you as in the general you.
Excellent. Your on board then that no judge should be politically biased. Right? Just wanna get your position clearly understood. Let's start with Canon 1 to adhere to the brevity approach. You're on board with the verbage of C1. No moral disputes for you in it's intent?