Here are some questions you should ask anyone who supports AGW: 1. Why do scientists who back AGW always exclude the 1930's data which shows that the world was MUCH warmer than it is today? 2. Why did AlGore/Jim Hansen skew the CO2 chart by 800 YEARS to line up with the temperature chart? 3. Why has the world been cooling since 1998? 4. Why did the cold November of 2008 wipe out ALL WARMING since the beginning of the century? 5. How can temperature measurements be accurate when the number of testing stations used was DRASTICALLY reduced and almost all of the existing stations are in urban centers? Ever heard if the Urban Heat Island effect? 6. If Al Gore is so serious about preventing global warming, why does his mansion use as much energy as 50 average American homes? And why has he just purchased a new 'seaside' mansion in Florida at the cost of nine milluion dollars? Where did he get the money to buy his new 100 foot yacht? Why was Al Gore's house lit up like a Christmas tree during Earth Hour? How much money has Gore made through his "carbon credit" trading company? CO2 has increased in the atmosphere by 100 parts per million in the last 100 years, thats just one part in 10,000... and thats enough to cause disaster? Get real. Global warming is a political issue, not a scientific one, when they start calling people who don't believe in man induced global warming names (deniers), you know its got nothing to do with science. Its socialism between countries (Kyoto). There is no clear consensis, climatology is up there with astrology. The tragedy is this focus distracts from REAL environmental issues, destruction of forest habitats and diversity and massive semi invisable damage to marine ecosystems due to over fishing and Exxon and co's cost cutting practices which recently caused the worst maratime distater in human history. Oh yeah, how interesting that the Heartland Institute recently received funding from Exxon, $750,000 last time I checked. Why would an oil company sponsor an organization examining the causes of global warming?
Thanx, In Germany they also remplace the manned stations by automatic ones which is a catastrophy (no more exact snow data, no flood data, no distant storms, no tornado warnings, no cloud classifications and so on) and so they can easier manipulate the data.
Winter beginning extreme in europe http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/story/42444/heavy-snow-bitter-cold-beset-e.asp
It hasn't. 1998 was an anomaly in a warming trend and 2010 has been the warmest since records began. That said, here's my question: 7. Where do you people get this kind of propaganda? (I seriously want to know)
I'm guessing ANTIGORE is a bot... searches key phrases. Cognative dissonance...Corporate psy-ops, man. :afro:
I tend to agree with this to a point- though I more imagine a market is being enforced to ensure obscene profitability for "green" industries for the purpose of enriching those who already have plenty while having a negligible effect on the environment. Governing through economics...
No,there can be absolutely no effect by humanity on the earth. None whatsoever. After all-- Nothing ever affects anything. Thought everyone knew that.
Yeah but didn't you read midgardsun's post? It's snowed in Europe yesterday so it must all be a hoax.
UK: coldest opening week of december since 1879, second coldest since 1659 http://www.accuweather.com/ukie/bastardi-europe-blog.asp greetings from snow storm battered southern Germany