Another power house topic. Consider how they wasted our time as incompetent e-mail activists on the problems of wind generation. We could have been competent e-mail activists on the problem of cutting back of human paper products dilemma.:sultan:?:sombrero:
This thread is about global warming and your posts don't seem to make any sense or have anything to do with the topic. Why is that?
more global warming hoax stupidities http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110609/ap_on_re_us/as_australia_killing_camels
I think that fighting the methane problem is a lost cause. Look at the DeepWater Horizon incident. Out in the oceans there is a vast supply of methane. It is iced and sitting underneath sediment. And it poses as a major climate threat. http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2719/are-there-deposits-of-methane-under-the-sea http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/gas-hydrates/title.html http://www.pnas.org/content/106/49/20596.full http://www.lakepowell.net/sciencecenter/catastrophic.htm
world temperature didnt rise from 1998-2008 http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/world-temperatures-did-not-rise-from.html
little ice age ahead? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2010757/Shivering-Britain-Little-Ice-Age-way.html
Just more idiotic misinformation from a blog. You AGW denier cultists sure are gullible. Try some actual science for a change. State of the Climate Global Analysis - Annual 2010 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - National Climatic Data Center Global Temperatures The year 2010 tied with 2005 as the warmest year since records began in 1880. The annual global combined land and ocean surface temperature was 0.62°C (1.12°F) above the 20th century average. The range associated with this value is plus or minus 0.07°C (0.13°F). The 2010 combined land and ocean surface temperature in the Northern Hemisphere was also the warmest on record, while the combined land and ocean surface temperature in the Southern Hemisphere was the sixth warmest such period on record. The annual globally averaged land temperature was 0.96°C (1.73°F) above average, which tied with 2005 as the second warmest year record. The range associated with this value is plus or minus 0.11°C (0.20°F). The warmest year was 2007, at 0.99°C (1.78°F) above the 20th century average. The decadal global land and ocean average temperature anomaly for 2001–2010 was the warmest decade on record for the globe, with a surface global temperature of 0.56°C (1.01°F) above the 20th century average. This surpassed the previous decadal record (1991–2000) value of 0.36°C (0.65°F).
hoax about global warming yes it is, i have to say! emails been leaked about the hoax first time i have ever heard about it
Do you know what the emails said? I doubt it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
For global warming? Do they want it to happen, or do they just want mankind to be wholly responsible? Also, 99.9% of the Scottish public believe there should be more global warming in Scotland.
Well assuming midgardsun's site was meant to be disbelief of it. If it meant that they were against it happening, that's fine with me. And I don't think even GW would make Scotland a less miserable place to live :sunny:
But there are a thousand ways to die. If that is not a warning: I don't know what is.:sunny: <v/t> and we can include animals in our equation.
It's a purposely deceptive graph from a denier cult blog. In the first place, it is not a full temperature record; it is a satellite record of mid-troposphere temperatures, not the full land/ocean/atmosphere that real climate scientists use and that better reflect the reality of what the world is facing. The denier graph covers only a ten year period out of the entire one hundred and fifty year instrumental record. It starts in 1998, the hottest year on record at the time and, relative to previous years, an exceptionally hot year due to a very strong El Nino. It conveniently stops in 2008, a relatively cool year while still being the eleventh warmest year on record. It also ignores 2009 and 2010 which were record setting hot and would have given the curve a strong upward jink at the end if they'd been included. It is denier cult 'cherry-picking' at it's sleaziest. Junk science from a bought-off denier stooge ex-weatherman who is trying to deceive you. Here's what the actual trend looks like over the whole length of the instrumental temperature record from the actual climate scientists at NASA.
The Nasa falsified its numbers as well, like all those part of the hoax. Dont you remember climategate? http://www.climategate.com/