Is Man Made Global Warming A Hoax Now?

Urban heat islands
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_heat_island

urban heating
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~sass/UHI.html

 

With reference to the weather conditions by the terms of chaotic development, Climate change is not a cause of anything. It is an equilibrium of the weather predictions with respect to themselves, in essence the climate effected for the balance of radiation or the measure of temperatures for our personal energy.

This movie explains it all.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4183226/the_ice_storm_movie_trailer/

Now, this is white.

 

Sounds like wordplay to me. Are you seriously contending that increasing atmospheric CO2 will, for example, cause increase ocean acidification?

 

Oh yes the salt concentration should increase of the over -all oceans, definitely, by 3% in the next hundred years.

 

Metallic salts? Well I don't know much about that and 3% seems quite modest, but I would have thought that the extra carbonic acid would be more of a problem.

 

I wonder why the earth warmed to end the ice age? There weren't even SUV's back then. Maybe wooly mammoth farts? Or, maybe weather goes on a cycle? Wow. Imagine if there were no one to blame for the weather. What a thought.

 

What if both were possible? What a thought, but too complex for many.

 

global warming lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-F8EO3qOVk&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube - Global Warming

 

In communism engineers could be criminally prosecuted for the death of working class members. As far as I know; no one was prosecuted for the B.P. catastrophe; now my typing is getting atrocious; I shall siece.


I know what I am:

this is a Fact. To me.


http://www.theweathernetwork.com/weather/maps/lowres/?ref=satradhighband

 

I've read some of your posts on this forum and I'm kind of curious. Are you just a very ignorant, uneducated, scientifically illiterate, extremely gullible and not very bright dupe of the fossil fuel industry propaganda campaign who is posting all of this BS for political reasons or are you a more formal stooge or agent of that propaganda campaign who is being paid to knowingly spread misinformation, lies and twisted pseudo-science to confuse the public and delay any effective national action to curtail our carbon emissions (and thereby cut the profits of those selling fossil fuels)?

It's obviously one or the other. So which are you?

Scientific opinion on climate change


***

 

Does anyone want to hear this mind blowing startling fact?

There was global warming 10,000 years ago. There was global warming 500 million years ago.

As you can see, it's all human fault..

....

=\

 

So....in other words, you're completely clueless and have no idea what people are talking about.

 

Brilliant. No, I really mean it! Pure genius. Here, have this honorary doctorate in climatology.

Have you considered extending your research to other fields? I'm thinking something like 'plant and animal species died millions of years ago so man is incapable of killing off any species'?

 

climategate
http://www.climategate.com/

 

Noam Chomsky explains how Climate change became a 'liberal hoax'
http://www.thenation.com/video/158093/noam-chomsky-how-climate-change-became-liberal-hoax

 

climategate scientists
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ecretive-broken-Freedom-Information-laws.html

 

I'm skeptical about the AGWH but I'd take Noam Chomsky on his word before anyone writing for the daily mail...

 

LOLOLOL....jeez but you're clueless, dude.

Some excerpts from your newspaper article:
The enquiry ... cleared the researchers at the CRU of any wrongdoing and said there was no evidence they manipulated data to strengthen the case for manmade global warming. The two further investigations also concluded that the scientists were honest...

In its response to the Science and Technology Committee’s report today, the Government said that nothing done at the CRU undermines the scientific consensus on human-induced climate change’. The response, drawn up by a range of departments, including the Government Office for Science, the Department for Business Innovation and Skills and the Department of Energy and Climate Change concludes: ‘As the Committee notes, much rests on the accuracy and integrity of climate change science. ‘It is vital that the wider public and Government can take confidence in the evidence that underpins public policies.

‘Evidence from multiple disciplines and sources strongly indicates that climate change driven by human activities poses real risks for our future...

***

 

lol new climate change model
http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/2011/04/new-coupled-climate-model-results/

 

Yep! Those damn Triceratops riding their dirtbikes!