Is it time to talk about guns?

Media rigging Yang to lose is pretty obvious, lots of proof, not like bigfoot with bigfoot filmed in 96p cameras.

 

Who decides when the government has completely defiled human rights?
you asked that question so I asked

 

We have a poster on this thread who dislikes/distrust the government yet he/she is using the internet.

 

Wrat1

I’m with MeAgain – what is your point?

I mean do you know anything about the history of Myanmar?

What has this got to do in the context of US gun control?

 

Police trying to identify gunman, motive in FedEx shooting

Yet another brave patriot of the "well regulated militia" defends liberty from tyranny.

 

To the thread title: No. It's time to vote about guns without talking.

 

In 'Murica, talkin' 'bout gunz meenz talkin' bout rate of fire, caliber, destructive force... stuff like dat.


I shoot now... Good luck to everybody else.

 

I trust that most of you believe that no one should have a weapon to defend yourself or your loved ones ?

 

No, not me I am of the opposite oppinion

 

Not at all. However, an assault rifle with a bandolier of high-capacity magazines isn't a defensive weapon, unless you live in a combat zone.
If you feel the need to own an assault rifle to defend yourself, you're mistaken. What you really need to do is reassess your life choices.

 

Do you drive a vehicle, if so what do you have ?

 

You mean the one I license, register, insure, and have demonstrated that I have sufficient education and competency to operate? What's your point?
What it's not is an M3 Bradley with a 25 mm Bushmaster on it.

 

You just described a law abiding gun owner,

 

"law abiding gun owner" should not be confused with someone who is "legally able to buy a gun"

 

Difference ?