Actually, there are historians recently that have discovered and documented that Austrian scientists were researching and developing atomic bombs and atomic technology capabilities before originally anticipated. Historians are well-known for uncovering such details, and unfortunately I don't study history, but I'm sure someone in the history forums or someone who studies history could give you a whole stack of conspiracy theories that can be explained and accepted within the field.
Amazing! I predicted your post before you made it. It was simple. Rat makes a ridiculous statement, like "evidence revealed that Bush is planning on seizing power in 2009". I point out that like all Rat predictions, when they don't happen, that doesn't prove him wrong. The next day, Rat posts to say that "of course it doesn't matter if Bush stays in power or not". So there you go - just like I said he would, Rat claims that no matter what happens, it proves him right.
What exactly do you mean? Are you saying there is no such things as conspiracies? History is laden in conspiracy.
How is it not successful because it was documented? What conspiracies are documented? Most people believe JFK wasn't shot by Lee Harvey Oswald, yet the media will talk about it like the official story is true, despite being disproven many times over. Anyone who has seen the Zapruder film, who isn't in denial, knows that.
Did anyone consider the possibility that maybe he won't finish out his term for some reason? If Bush died in 2007 than it would be pretty stupid to have a trophy that reads 2001-2009.