Installing a husband

Dear Tech Support,

Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a distinct slowdown in overall system performance, particularly in the flower and jewelry applications, which operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0. In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as: Romance 9.5 and Personal Attention 6.5, and then installed undesirable programs such as : NBA 5.0, NFL 3.0 and Golf Clubs 4.1 Al so Conversation 8.0 no longer runs, and House cleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. Please note that I have tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail. What can I do?

Signed,
Desperate

DEAR DESPERATE,

First, keep in mind, Boyfriend 5.0 is an Entertainment Package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system. Please enter command: ithoughtyoulovedme.html and try to download Tears 6.2 and do not forget to install the Guilt 3.0 update. If that application works as designed, Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications Jewelry 2.0 and Flowers 3.5.

However, remember, overuse of the above application can cause Husband 1.0 to default to Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0 or Beer 6.1. Please note that Beer 6. 1 is a very bad program that will download the Farting and Snoring Loudly Beta.

Whatever you do, DO NOT, under any circumstances, install Mother-In-Law 1.0 (it runs a virus in the background that will eventually seize control of all your system resources.)

In addition, please do not attempt to re-install the Boyfriend 5.0 program. These are unsupported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.

In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have limited memory and cannot learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to improve memory and performance. We recommend: Cooking 3.0 and Hot Lingerie 7.7.

Good Luck!

 

:rofl:

 

Love It......:2thumbsup:



Cheers Glen.

 

Wow and a first post too?

Already love you hahahaha

 

This is hilarious.

 

Way too nerdy to be written by a female methinks though

 

That was cute.

Heavy on enforcing traditional gender roles and expectations, but still cute.

Dafuq is that supposed to mean, brah? :toetap05:

Jk, not mad. But I do disagree.

 

Yuck, more like sickeningly so.

 

:smilielol5:

 

That's what I thought, too.

 

Well thought out. Nice 1st post--good sense of humor.

 

Uhmmm, yeah, that's what makes it so funny...
geez...

 

Well, if we can't laugh at our foibles------------------

 

Clever.

 

What's well thought-out about it?

It's just common or garden plagiarism, isn't it?

I'm sure I first encountered this about five years ago.

Not that I've got anything about plagiarism per se, you understand ... sharing funny posts you've encountered elsewhere by re-posting them is fine by me. And often you cant' attribute, because nobody knows who first wrote them. It's just ... it doesn't take a lot of thinking to do it!

 

I know right? It's a joke.

 

Well, I never heard it before. New to me.

 

I have as well several years ago. I also read one about Wife 1.0 at about the same time. If I can dig it up, I'll post it...