In General, Does Prostitution Lift Women’S Dignity Or It Degrades?

Define “bad”

 

Well... nowadays, I think choosing to be an interpreter is a bad choice. AI and all the technical advances make them no longer necessary.
If you ask feminists, they will tell you that prostitution is degrading for women, that they are exploited by pimps and pushed into that work by hunger. But then we get to know some of these workers, and we learn that they are in the business by their own choice, that they are independent and not necessarily in the business because they have no other option. Many have chosen it over other options.

 

Exactly…there is a difference between myself and girl on the corner giving blowjobs for drugs.

 

Much too soon to think that. The hype isn't aligned with reality.

High level translation such as that in a corporate or legal sphere won"t yet use AI if they're competent. Given that even a comma or a spelling error can change the whole meaning of a sentence it will need a human, either to perform the translation or to review an AI translation, so that someone is accountable if its wrongly done and causes a costly venture to collapse.

I'm unsure as to why feminists should be consilted on the subject. Women yes, amongst others, but feminists??

Agreed but, of course, in relation to those who are satisfying a drug habit or who are being pimped out, sex-working actually isn't the problem. The problem is their drug habit or the pond-life that's pimping them out.
The practice that is 'sex-work' isn't a problem and sometimes it provides a solution. (Pun not intended )

 

Do you know all the guys I talk to on this forum who don’t get it at home for one reason or another…well it’s the same out in the physical world! I don’t know why it’s mostly the men who aren’t getting it as much as they want, but I think if I can offer something with no strings that helps each of us, what is the harm?

 

So long as it’s consenting adults there should be no problem.

 

That is right. Let's say then that they are no longer as necessary as they once were.
Several times, when I don't fully understand something someone said, I resort to translating it into my language to completely understand it.
On the other hand, when I have to write something that requires a certain level of complexity, I do it in Spanish using the translator, because this tool seems to be more skilled than I am.
Something that didn't exist at all in the times when I was learning English.

 

I share your same philosophy. But social norms seem to have deeply ingrained in certain individuals the idea that opening a relationship with other people must be taken as an unforgivable offense. Even if it’s just sex without any other feelings. Maybe not so much on HF, where there are many open-minded people, but I’m referring to society in general. Especially in Western countries that are deeply influenced by religion and its rules.

 

I agree there are use cases for AI translation but in a social setting where few would employ a translator. Not so much in legal or contract law settings.

So; I get why you think as you do but I can't work out where the reduction in numbers is occurring.

 

Like getting hurt physically or mentally? Not being in control?

 

For someone in a committed relationship the harm is emotional. There's so many factors involved here. There's the emotions of the receiver, the provider, and lest we not forget, the one not involved. The one not involved being the spouse aka the significant other (SO). All three have an emotional attachment to the sex act. The provider carries the least emotions. But the receiver can get caught up in the attention and allow emotions build. Then the SO, who does not know there is a tryst happening, feels secure the receiver is being "faithful". When the truth comes out negative emotions build most times into hate. Sad to say this is the harm. It's not that I don't approve of sex work and the why. It's just that human nature has trouble dealing with NSA sex.

 

At that stage, it's not NSA.

I recall a FB one time who was very close to being a sex worker. She didn't accept financial payment but if you arranged a meeting, for sex, she would meet. She had to consider the guy handsome or attractive which is another difference between her and an actual professional.

Anyway, I decided there would be no kissing. No contact between my face and her facial lips and I explained that to her at the beginning saying if I ever kissed her on her lips, it would mean I was falling for her.

It stayed NSA quite easily for me. She fucked other guys on a Friday or Saturday mostly and we fucked or played Sunday to Friday.

Lasted about six months. It was good. Sex when I wanted - actually more than I wanted - and she got cum as much as she wanted, even calling in on her lunch-break to eat some. No persuasion, no chatting up, no mind games, nothing taboo; just straightforward and reciprocal. Marvellous

 

I don’t know? I think with Jenna, is no relationship and she does usually in groups and mostly not even names…so basically human sex machine. If the men have a wife, I think much less harm than somebody like me. I have more regular clients, maybe many married and average age 55-60, and sometimes a bit of talk and not only sex…so I think they look at me as substitute? Maybe that is more strings?

 

There are clients who do look to their sex worker as someone they can talk to. Reason is they get no judgement from their SW. Just a sounding board in which they can get things off their chest. I've done it. Met with a regular I had years ago and after the sex we would cuddle. I could open up and talk without worry what I said would get out or back to my SO. She told me that she had another client that would have sex with her but sometimes he just wanted to talk, no sex. Things like this creates a relationship of sorts. One that is more than just sex.

 

So would you say Rana is actually doing more harm to somebody’s relationship because she is actually developing relationships whereas I tend to provide a more of a Jurassic Park type ride?

 

Absolutely not. The harm does not come from the provider unless she has intentions of building a relationship with the client that goes beyond establishing a client base to support an income. No, it's the client who lets his emotions get the best of him. She's doing much like you except you are doing more of a amusement park ride than the other. A Jurassic Park ride usually ends up in death of one or more of the riders (according to the movies). I doubt anyone has died because they got to fuck you. They probably felt as though they died and went to heaven but found themselves with just a great memory and a little lighter in the wallet.

 

Thank you for that analysis! So in an x-rated Jurassic Park, maybe I am the prey and the guys would be the carnivores?

 

No, reverse that. The guys would be the prey. You'd chew 'em up and spit 'em out. Just as long as they take care of your sex drive. It's like the black widow spider who kills the male after sex.

 

Yummy…that way I get to survive each movie to return in the next sequel!

 

There you go! lol
If the male does a good job you don’t chew his penis off. If they give good head they get to keep theirs.