Illuminati use of Gay Agenda for De-population

<< So in the context of “corrupting heritage gene pools” are you saying someone with middle eastern
ancestors should not be allowed to have children with a person with Scandinavian ancestors
because it would result in a corruption of their heritage gene pools?>>

I said your concept of genetics is too simple for a fucking high school biology class - stop trying to pipe your false tactic bs and create/force your bs version of self gratifying debate at my expense and screw with someone who wants to play games. That is what I'm saying.

Oh, and this is about people's thoughts and opinions on secret societies, not about you derailing it for a chance to blow hard on some "racial" debate.

 

Let's reframe this, using so-called mental illness instead.

sociopathy, psychopathy, personality disorders (such as famous narcissism and famous borderline), paraphilias, depression, anxiety, bipolar, autism, attention deficit disorder, schizophrenia, alcoholism, insanity, drug addiction as a disease, miscellaneous addictions (and the list goes on and on)

"science" wishes that those things were fundamental, genetic brain diseases / disorders. Would you want to have a child with a psychopathic insane bi-polar OCD borderline schizophrenic? Could you imagine being such a person? Can any one person even have *that* much genetic misfortune?

Such people were targeted for sterilization and extermination, right?

Does "mix breeding" .. "corrupt the gene pool"? Is it better to breed within one's own kind?

Using myself as the example (wicked cross, heh) .. I'm English, Irish and Italian (with two supposed genetic mutations). If I was 100% Italian, would my teeth be different? In fact, they would .. because I know where the diastema comes from.

 

Gin

I am trying to understand what you were saying in the context of this discussion that is the essence of debate. I‘m seeking clarification.

Then how am I to know or understand your thinking?

Maybe in bad sci-fi novels with their nasty ‘muties’ but they’re very different in meaning.

To corrupt (especially in the context of what I was addressing the person talking of the corruption of the gene pool) is the idea of purposefully despoiling of the something.

Mutations are something very different especially in the context of what was said, mutations are often naturally occurring and part of a natural evolutionary process, sometimes the mutations are beneficial sometimes not so. A mutation has no agenda.

Are you saying that to you eye colour for instance was the result of some ‘corruption’ from some once pure form or part of some natural ‘mutation’?

 

True, this thread is thoroughly derailed. Maybe celebrating can get it back on track.

 

I already made it clear. Boldly so. You attempted to pitch your thoughts (as if they were mine.. "are you saying" .. that's called putting words in people's mouth). I don't engage that .. I see it as a fighting mentality, not discussion and conversation.

 

old

So you don’t know what you were thinking?

 

gin

Ok I’m still not sure what you thinking is.

Are you saying that you would like to sterilize or murder anyone with a genetic disorder?

What do you mean?

You think people should only allowed to breed within one's own kind? What ‘kind’ is that you say “If I was 100% Italian” but Italians have a very diverse gene pool (just look at the history of that area of Europe).

 

What is the 'PC agenda'? and is that a bad or good thing?

Well 'they' have you two in lockstep with the overall PC agenda (what ever the hell that is).

The Illuminati must have forgotten about most of Africa.
A large part of Russian, and the majority of the middle east.
Not forgetting vast tracts of Islamic states.
Plus approx 1 billion people of a religious persuasion where no amount of watching 'Will and Grace' reruns will make them think homosexuality is ok, and heck, may try it themselves and not have children.

I can't remember when the population has decreased in any significant numbers...maybe


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OSaJE2rqxU"]Noah - Official Trailer (2014) [HD] Russel Crowe, Emma Watson - YouTube

 

For the third time now, you said

My thinking is exactly, specifically and precisely this: what you said is *Not so true, Balbus*

For the third time now, I won't engage your attempt to put words in my mouth. I speak for myself with NO handicaps whatsoever.

Balbus, please reread what I wrote. I did not say any such thing.

Do you do this on purpose? For sport? Is it just a bad habit?

 

Gin

Not so true?

So you are saying it is partway true?

What part?

OK for me all humans are virtually the same generically and so in a general sense there is no gene pool to corrupt through the mixing of differing groups.

So far you haven’t actually disproved that you’ve given examples like eye colour and some genetic disorders but it still stand that humans are on the whole genetically similar.

LOL except the handicap it seems of not been able to answer a question.

I did and you said – “Is it better to breed within one's own kind? Using myself as the example (wicked cross, heh) .. I'm English, Irish and Italian (with two supposed genetic mutations). If I was 100% Italian, would my teeth be different? In fact, they would .. because I know where the diastema comes from”

You asked yourself the question ““Is it better to breed within one's own kind?” then using yourself as an example you seemed to say yes.

So I asked you if that was what you meant and will again is that what you meant and if not what are you trying to say.

 

I have to say farewell to you now.

 

Why this topic is always a waste of time

You can never say out loud what really grinds your gears, so just a whole lot of vague nonsense then evasive tactics, then finally drift off into the sunset.

To which you may reply with:

Well, why dont you tell me what grinds my gears

Then I reply, well, no, I dont have to, I just have to stand here and smirk

 

Ok Gin

It’s a pity because I really did want to know what you were trying to say. I really can’t understand why some people get so annoyed about being asked questions.

Anyway back to the thread – Can someone please explain why they think homosexuality undermines ‘morality’ and what that has to do with the evil conspiracy’s agenda?

 

Hey Balbus, welcome to the club!:mickey:

You are now among the illustrious ranks of HF members that Gina is now ignoring.
Keep up the good work.:2thumbsup:

 

Easiest way out :bobby: But it only makes sense when you're conversing with a pointless convo partner, which Balbus doesn't seem to be. Hence, you're acting like a chicken once again

More accurately put: says she is ignoring :mickey: I noticed she sometimes does reply to posts she isn't supposed to be able to see anymore :biggrin:

 

Shhh, she thinks she is being sneaky. :hide:

 

Let's abide to the rules of the internet and call him him

 

She's just impossible to have any sort of conversation or debate with. Literally, impossible. Unless she agrees with everything you say.

But anyways...back on topic. Well, back on topic-I find this thread very interesting and actually hoping someone does answer Balbus's question... but as for me, I don't really have an opinion on this topic at all, so can't help...

 

Back on Topic:

All of what the Illuminati and their pawns, "the mainstream media," do nowadays is try to make people more accepting of homosexuality. Whether it be through news columns or your favorite tv shows, they are trying to make you accept gayness and are even promoting it in some instances. Now, all of this is done in the name of creating a more progressive culture where everyone can be tolerated safely. For many, this can be seen as a good thing. After all, people should be able to live their lives as they choose to do so without fear of persecution, right? In that regard, yes. However, the Illuminati have an even more dastardly motive for promoting the acceptance of homosexuality. It's part of their ultimate plan to breed a master race.

Think about it. Gay people cannot have children. Sure, there are those few couples that either adopt, use a sperm bank, or surrogate. Then again, most of them just live without reproducing, knowing that that is one of the consequences of their choices. That is what the Illuminati is aiming for. If more people feel comfortable about exploring their homosexual tendencies in a safe environment, they will be less likely to have children. This places the secret order one step further in their goals for world conquest.

Selective breeding by creating a more homosexual population is something that the Illuminati have been exploring for decades. Their experiments started in the prisons, where they wanted to see if heterosexual men would turn gay in an all-male environment. The answer was yes. Straights will become gay in order to fulfill their sexual desires when circumstances call for it. With this knowledge in hand, the Illuminati moved on to their next step, brainwashing the population through the media. The Illuminati know this phase will take longer but should succeed after several generations. Right now, the plan is still in its early stages, just wear down the public's intolerance of gays. This started in the 90s and is seeing rapid growth, and guess what, the number of people identifying themselves as homosexual is on the rise.

Today, we're seeing the push for gay marriage along with more rights for gay couples. This is a big leap since the days of people barely accepting homosexuals at all. The Illuminati are experts at mind control and know what they're doing. They've got one party in-line with the media, trumpeting homosexuality, and they have the other party offering token resistance just to cover their tracks. Don't be fooled by any of this. While people should be free to do as they please, that is not an excuse for the Illuminati to seize it as a tool to aid in their selective breeding program.

 

Besides world hunger, poverty and inequality, humanity faces another social phenoma: over-population. I recently read Dan Brown's newly published book Inferno. The book talks about over-population and (spoiler alert!) how a plague was produced to leave 1/3 of the population infertile.

It got me thinking, if we did find the technology to do this, would we do it? Should we? Then again, isn't reproduction a basic human right? Yet, this same right is making our already limited resources even more limited.

What do you think fellow TEDizens. Are we taking enough initiative as it is regarding birth control? Are campaings of contraceptive methods enough or should we have a more radical approach? There are already countries that support the idea of population control, amidst them China and India. Is this enough?

Let me know what you think.

RELATED TALKS:
Hans Rosling: Global population growth, box by box