If God Is A Contradiction Then He Does Not Exist

And to think I thought my depths imperturbable! :-D

No wonder I'm a warrior. :-D

Facile, that's us. lol

I think I zoned out there for a moment... phew, now where were we? Perception of itself is not enough information when we find ourselves asking what we're seeing? I don't see how, it being information enough to look further.

I don't believe you! You say love is what we are. If we're not our interest, we're lost.

Form doesn't end. Which particulars would you bear witness to? "If" form is content? It is. But that's not why you're threatened with extinction! Let's hear more concerning what you think a convincing 'body of evidence', and the sorrow you think could be mistaken for peace. Doesn't ring true to me.

It loves to do what you tell it, it would have you know what you want... what you are! :-D

 

The I am you call yourself is the same I am I call myself. i.e.

[

Amazonian cowgirl?

Exactly, you must refer to higher powered magnification. The magnanimous intent.

No you're just disinterested.
You bear all things .
You can be bored and think your lost but in this you do misplace yourself.
Interest is tastes invitation, a gathering. What you are goes out for dinner and dancing on invitation. Doesn't go out if not inviting.

Now you contradict yourself in trying to tenuously connect your previous statements. If form and content are the same and form doesn't end then there is no death unless death is a form of life.

I know you are not familiar with many things, not seeing how, perception being insufficient of itself to be knowledge. Knowledge is always sharing.
Have you have never known sorrow for someone you know that didn't live forever? Ever loose something you thought important and were disconcerted by it? Felt like your enjoyment would be closer if you just had it back? Never experienced a sense of loss? That would be the evidence of the physical. Did you loose anything of yourself but your comfort? The sorrow comes when you mistake the body for your home. You inhabit the body but the body lives in the world.

The body wouldn't do anything on it's own because to do so makes it burn. It is a struggle to stand up against gravity which wants to lay down. We always choose with a guide. Animus animates animal. if you didn't have the chemical cues you wouldn't eat. I have spent a great amount of time energized on the question of motivation. All the body cares about is insulation. It would eat your brother if it were given the chance it cares only to keep warm. Corpulence.

 

And this from my fat head, No body told me this.

An unhealed healer is a contradiction in terms.

We add minister to the body.

We are magnanimous intent

animus animates animal.

 

Be happy. Don't worry. Petro Poroshenko will be the substitute for God so that there be no contradiction in the union of the union and disunion. From Kazakhstan's side of It, it affords that democracy is synthetically true. The natural world is undemocratic; only people will live in the Democracy, the people who least afford it. I'm confused. Chocolate is no good to religion; is that so?

 

Not so.
What is the same is the same and what is different is different and not the same.
You may eat of any fruit in the garden for food. Religion is good to the religious.
Animus animates animal. We are magnanimous intent.

breath gives life to our creature

Human being is a biofeedback loop, a two part being, homo sapiens sapiens, tasting man and knowing man.

 

So is essence the same to the yellow man as the white man? We conceive the only way out; that they can communicate to each other by different judgements for the concludedly less scientific debate.

 

Man is the authority here yellow and white are the colors he paints.

 

Tasting man and knowing man

Getting those two confused is what kills ya.

Confusion form and content.

 

So how do you go loop de loop

according to your intention

 

i can say God exists because the contradiction must be explained for the lack of common Essence. Man? What does the word "man" mean unscientifically? in German there is Haben, Dasein, and Maan.:drool5:

 

I am

Homo sapiens sapiens, I am knowing and tasting.

 

I AM set aside from myself to be one amongst the many in "Mann". I am scientifically classified to be male or female, "haben" and "fraullein". "I am what I am", never myself.

 

No you are conceptually classified male and female, this is creative principle.
I am that I am.

 

I can't help ya'. The contradiction idea of using the definitions of 'MAN' are technical in the German language, and the use of being culturally human are rationally strict this way. One uses the public toilet facilities this way; one takes account as a member of the impersonal state this way. Is not the subjectivity of someone to be realized independent of the state issues?

I am what I am is the matter that gets recognized for a Self's objective acceptance by the Law. Hmmmm... then there is God's law.:love:

 

Shall we say gay marriage? Say no to GMO.

 

I thought I came to the conclusion: because of the gay situation and other imperfect situations, thus by the civil society God can exist for the essential contradiction of perceiving and being perceived.

 

What imperfect situations?
I am tasting and knowing. Perceiving and being perceived. Creation is a law without opposite. You are in the world but not of it.

 

Sounds good. The honour of war disproves God's existence.... until the woman of his love disowns him for dying on her instead of avoiding the draft and marrying her. The war was not really so honourable. Thus there is either no honour in dying for your country, or this God just didn't exist.

 

I just realized---did anyone ever point out that philosophers and theologians got around this contradiction through: a.) Radical Theology, such as Tillich, or b.) Theistic Naturalism, such as Dewey.

In either case there is no contradiction of a perfect God allowing for evil, because God is a state of being rather than the all-perfect, all-knowing creator. In Radical Theology, for example, god is the ground of our being. In Theistic naturalism, god is a state we are moving towards.

 

accounted for by all things are lawful

accounted for by not all things are helpful

accounted for by helpful is a matter of timing