I am somewhat against male circumcision --but not passionately so. I would have to look more into it. I've heard a lot of mixed things, but it doesn't seem worth even the temporary pain that it causes the infant. My current partner is pro-circumcision. If we had a male child together at this point, I would likely let him make that call. It's somewhat difficult to listen to anyone's opinions on the matter because very few adults have experienced being both circumcised and uncircumcised. People are more likely to support the "side" they are currently on. Uncut people espouse uncut, and cut espouse cut. So, whatever. Either way I would be happy if my child could go on and have a normal and pleasant sex life.
I know growing up we would tease the one guy not circumsized in gym class. In health class we learn hygeine problems when moisture is trapped under the foreskin. As an adult we hear how men and women hate to see an uncut penis due to over all looks.
^ I bet they didn't tell its mainly like that in the states and the opposite in most other western nations.
both of my boys are circumcised and their dads agreed and even pushed for it....they were both numbed before it happened, neither boy cried and it hurt the dad more to watch than it did the baby...im just saying it doesn't hurt the baby, they numb the baby first
I would never date a circumcised man. I would not want that trait in their partner that somewhere in their family line someone cough parents cough found it appropriate to take the perfectly functioning foreskin from a male and cut that off for near to no good reason. Unless you're Jewish. Which you aren't. My man gotta be 100% all there. none this 97.6% Jewish stuff.
what is with all the "I wouldn't date a man that is or isn't" seriously? if he is a good guy, or a good lay, then WTF does it matter, it would be the same if a guy said, I wont date a woman whose lips are tucked in, I only date flower looking pussy. or I wont date a girl who has her lips poking out, it looks like arbys beef and cheddar. I personally like cock. and I like them for their differences.
I just chimed in because everyone was pro cut. Except a few. Because I'm European the cut circumisision usually signifies a Jewish faith, not normality. People spoke of it looks better when cut as a personal preference but I have to disagree heavily. I only have porn as experience but there seems no consistency in circumsision. Some look normal as the skin is pulled back, some too tight, too loose, too tight one side... then European porn usually the skin looks weird I guess. I always say like a snail without a shell or a slug or something right??? But the skin comes back, they all look the same. I'm near pretty certain the skin stays back during intercourse and they all look healthy purple and not some red angry monster from netherworld seeks revenge on those who chopped him.
i feel like estimating foreskin to be 2.4% of a man is very generous toward his foreskin. unless he's just a tiny man with a giant dick.
Like I said. My only experience is porn. But if I understand you. The foreskin is really 97% of his worth and it's unfortunate it's thrown out at such a young age?
That sounds like blatant foreskinphobia to me. I'm sick of this discriminating hatred towards non cut men. #noncutlivesmatter
Absolute BS ......... yeast infections are usually on your inner thighs. But you only catch them during sex, they are STDs. (Some claim you can get them from dirty shared towels in gyms ..... but I think Urban legend) Jock itch, easily cured with any Clotrimazole 1% cream (Canesten et al). Both partners need to use it at the same time, or you reinfect each other.
Just wondered what the pro camp for male curcumcision feel about female curcumcision ? Mutilation is mutilation especially when its a child your making the choice for.
Female circumcision is about taking away the ability of a female to enjoy sex. Male circumcision is about a cultiral look and possible hygeine under the useless flat that can trap moisture, bacteria and others stuff