I am my Father's Son: is that a tautology or a legitimate syllogism to develop by?

One would just perhaps decide that the blood tie has no meaningful basis for existence, ground in the unity of being. This is that we are all of the common family, the human race, or that we are all of, by religion, the original sin of being bread. Leave that 'bread' thing alone for substantially it nay only be itslef meaningful for the government needing productive tendencies (anything good but not of common race of any kind).

Anyway the syllogism may unfold for the nature of the society of governed people which wished to fulfill your father in a role. . Say my father was an engineer, and I am important to the community in some respected function being taught for wisdom about Nature. I presume to distinguish a Choice in my like of vocation which has some creative basis in engineering. Thus:

I am my father's son. He was an Engineer. I am more than a negation of his engineering; I actually determine the difference between the sun's influence on an engine throttle, and the heated pressure of the steam moving mechanically the piston's on the throttle.

The reason my father could not determine the difference such as present here was straight forward for his inability to tell the night from the day on using this steam engine for productive mankind.

Is the positive role oriented society good for a human individual ethics, or maybe the social attitude of ethos for the community?

Just asking for a happiness ethics which at this point lacks a viable source in our creation or a viable source in why the community wishes to keep developing the profit motive from the threat by recession and a new failing economy.:love::2thumbsup::daisy:

 

I am conceived.